Premium Essay

Why and How Have Some Socialists Advocated Revolution over Reform

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By jbertram1
Words 270
Pages 2
Plan: Why have some socialist’s advocated revolution rather than reform? (15)
Introduction:
Some socialists, namely fundamental socialists, have advocated the need for revolution, a forcible overthrow of a government or social order in favour of a new system. Whilst, 19th century socialists in particular advocated revolution because there were no other alternative methods of bringing about socialism. By contrast, the decision for reform refers to gradual, incremental change, brought about peacefully through the current process of the vote.
Body:
In favour of Revolution * The working class, in particular, have favoured revolution over reform as the state has become an agent of oppression, which continues to act in the best interests of the ‘bourgeoisie’ or ‘elitist’ groupings (owners of capital). Thus it must be removed, by the use of force. * It promises to bring about complete transformation of society. * The working class (proletariat) have very limited means of political influence – no means of the vote, trade unionism membership isn’t permitted and have no political parties that work promote their particular interests. * The state must be removed entirely; stateless society must be brought about through violence. The state will not remove itself. * Industrialism; the stark injustice – which creates a desperate underclass of people. Thus, the removal of capitalism, replaced by the construction of a new state, would enable the collective state interests to be achieved. * Revolution; class consciousness and the collective spirit are essential – replaced with state collectivism.
Therefore, there is no alternative but to overthrow the bourgeois state through a revolution because reform will not solve the fundamental problem of the oppressive Bourgeois state.
Closest example to a revolutionary…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Why the 1905 Revolution Failed

...Why the 1905 revolution failed The 1905 revolution failed due to many factors, all of which helped the Tsar government overcome the revolutionaries. The aim of the revolutionaries was to gain governmental reform, however the Tsar’s aim was not to lose power. One of the reasons that the 1905 revolution failed was due to the loyalty that Nicholas II had from his armed forces. With these armed forces the Tsar was able to crush the disturbances that were part of the revolution meaning that he could arrest the revolutionaries and either execute them or exile them to Siberia. This in effect reduced the amount of revolutionaries making it easier for the Tsar to stay in power throughout the revolution. Having the loyalty of the armed forces was a very significant reason for the failure of the revolution because if the army had have turned against the Tsar he would not have been able to overpower the revolution. Nicholas II also had support from a group known as the Black Hundreds. This was a counter revolutionary group formed of mainly richer citizens such as landowners who supported the principles of autocracy and Russian nationalism. The Black Hundreds helped the government regain control as even though they did not have governmental approval they hunted down and executed thousands of know reformers meaning that it would be again be easier for the government to survive during the revolution. Another reason for the failure of the 1905 revolution was disunity among the......

Words: 697 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Did Gorbachev's Reforms Fail and How Did Yeltsin Rise to Power?

...Why did Gorbachev's reforms fail and how did Yeltsin rise to power? In typical political terms, Gorbachev unsuccessful, and did thus catastrophically: the "democratic reformation" he tried to enact within the Soviet Union led to the breakup of his state and country. However that's not the total story of his six and a half years as leader, throughout that Gorbachev had two unprecedented achievements. He led Russia (then Soviet Russia) nearer to real democracy than it had ever been in its centuries-long history. And, with the partners he found in American presidents Ronald Reagan and the first George Bush, he came nearer to ending the decades-long cold war than had anyone before him. Nor is it reasonable to assume that Gorbachev should have completed those undertakings. Few transformational leaders, even "event-making" and "historically fateful" ones, are able to see their missions to completion. This is especially true of leaders of great reformations, whose nature and period generate additional opposition and problems than their initiators (unless they are a Stalin) have power or time to overcome. Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal, to require a well-known example, a perestroika of American capitalism, continued to unfold and undergo setbacks long after his death. Most such leaders can solely open political doors; leave behind alternative ways that did not exist before, and hope, as Gorbachev usually did publically, that what they began would be "irreversible." How is this......

Words: 1547 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Why Did the Tsar Survive the 1905 Revolution?

...During the 1905 Russian Revolution it was very much of a hostile time between the Tsar and he’s people due to much dissension. The Tsar wanted the autocratic government regime to rebel, however due to liberalist ideas gradually spreading across cities riots, strikes, and protest occurred more frequently. In order for the Tsar to survive he entwined a strategy of repression, and concession to the Russian people, enabling to elongate he’s reign in the dynasty. An extremely significant reason in why the Tsar remained during the 1905 revolution was because there no political alliance between other political groups. This was evident in the Liberal revolutionaries; the Liberals did not represent the people during the revolution as their aims were to share power with the Tsar. They ignored the initial aim of the people which was to overthrow Tsar. Moreover, the Social Democrats wanted a socialist state. However, the people of Russia didn’t understand these revolutionary theories, as majority were illiterate, and all they wanted was better economic livelihood. This lack of central coordination enabled the Tsar to command for so long. Along with the Orthodox Church heavily influencing the people of Russia, so did the political parties. However, the parties did not affiliate; in fact there was friction amongst the parties. Political parties having disagreements meant their priorities will sway away from trying to overthrow the Tsar, this is what enable is long reign. On the contrary,......

Words: 1084 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

To What Extent Have Socialist Favoured Common Ownership?

...The attitude to property sets socialism apart from Liberalism and Conservatism, which both regard property ownership as natural. Common ownership for socialist is a key principle because they believe according to Socialists property is unjust: they favour common ownership because wealth is produced by the collective effort of human labour, thus should be owned by the community not by privately by individuals. Another reason why socialists favour common ownership is because they believe property breeds acquisitiveness therefore is morally corrupting. Socialists argue that private property encourages people to be materialistic, leading individuals to believe human happiness can be gained through the pursuit of wealth. Those with their own property want to gain more, whilst those who have little or no wealth can no longer acquire it. Socialists also believe property is divisive: It creates conflict in society, for example, this is most clearly illustrated in the Marxist belief of class conflict. According to Marx, class is linked to economic power, as defined by the individuals relationship to the means of production, Class conflict is therefore between ‘capital’ and ‘labour’, that is between the bourgeoisie; owners of productive wealth, and the proletariat; those who live off the sale of their labour. Those who believe in fundamentalist socialism, which is a form of socialism that seeks to abolish capitalism and replace it with a qualitatively different kind of society,......

Words: 922 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Why Is the French Revolution Regarded as Such an Important Event in Modern International History?

...Modern society owes much of its origin to a great upheaval in the 18th century, the French Revolution. It was one aspect of a broader pattern of change that, since the Renaissance and Reformation, has set the West on a different path of development from that of the rest of the world. This pattern included the individualism and, in the end, the secularism, that was the Protestant legacy. It also included the rise of science, as a method and as a practice. This culminated in explosive events toward the end of the 18th century. The French Revolution ‘was a phenomenon as awful and irreversible as the first nuclear explosion, and all history has been permanently changed by it.’ The French Revolution is largely regarded as an important event in modern international history because of the way it has had international impact and continued to have international repercussions and influences on society and thought today. This essay will look at different aspects of the French Revolution and discuss how the different components of the revolution have affected the world and the impact of these at the time of the event. For the purposes of this essay the French Revolution will be defined as the insurrection in France that began in 1789 and ended in 1815 with the defeat of Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo. The actual dates of the revolution are widely contested but for the purposes of this essay, these dates will be used as a framework. Modern international will be assumed to mean......

Words: 1808 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

How and Why Have Feminists Been Critical of the ‘Public/Private’ Divide?

...How and why have feminists been critical of the ‘public/private’ divide?  The public/private divide is a particular concern for feminists. The public/private divide is a divide between the public sphere of work and politics usually dominated by men, and the private area of home and family in which typical gender roles are applied. This divide can be said to create the problem of gender inequality, as women are often pushed into being a housewife due to the societal norms; they are heavily discouraged from breaking out into the public sphere and beginning an alternative career. In this way, patriarchy has been created – whilst the women traditionally stay at home, the men are therefore the ones who are earning money and occupying important positions within society. Feminists believe that this gender inequality should be overthrown, although different types of feminists have different views on the subject. Liberal feminists wish to keep the public and private spheres separate. They do not want to completely remove the divide between the two, because they believe in maintaining a woman's personal freedom of choice between a domestic or public role. Moreover, they believe that men and women do have different natures – women have a natural leaning towards the domestic life and motherhood, rather than the more traditionally male public career. However, liberal feminists do believe that there is a need for reforms in the public sphere, for example equal pay is one of their......

Words: 581 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Some Children Have Imaginary Friends

...Have you ever seen a child talking with his own imaginary friend? It is quite a normal phenomenon which happens to children at the age of four or five. Some parents concern about this appearance. They think that it can be the result of physiological disorder of their child. This phenomenon can even been accepted as avoidance of reality. However, doctors claim that the fact of having imaginary friends shows some good qualities of children and has an important influence on them. The most significant result of having fictional friends is developed imagination of the person. These imaginary companions have certain personalities and behaviors which are given by their creators. For example, some of them can be brave and courageous character, the others shy and weak. All of them have different names, different jobs, different interests and different gender. The researches suggest that children are more likely to have unreal friends with similar gender. Also, it is a fact that most of the children borrow names for their creations from the names of surrounding them people or from the cartoons they like. This phenomenon may show another important impact on children in developing language and communication skills because they get more linguistic practice during conversations with their imaginary friends than with friends in real life. In addition, it makes them to be more friendly and communicable with schoolmates in future. Talking and playing with unreal friends can......

Words: 334 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Why Was the 1917 Revolution Successful?

...Why was the 1917 revolution successful? The underlying causes of the Russian Revolution are rooted deep in Russia's history. For centuries, autocratic and repressive tsarist regimes ruled the country and most of the population lived under severe economic and social conditions. During the 19th century and early 20th century various movements aimed at overthrowing the oppressive government were staged at different times by students, workers, peasants, and members of the nobility. Two of these unsuccessful movements were the 1825 revolt against Nicholas I and the revolution of 1905, both of which were attempts to establish a constitutional monarchy. Russia's badly organized and unsuccessful involvement in World War I (1914-1918) added to popular discontent with the government's corruption and inefficiency. In 1917 these events resulted in the fall of the tsarist government and the establishment of the provisional government and the Petrograd soviets who ran the country together until, the Bolsheviks in October staged a coup thus overthrowing the unpopular provisional government. The immediate cause of the February Revolution of 1917 was the collapse of the tsarist regime under the gigantic strain of World War I. The primary cause was the backward economic condition of the country, which made it unable to sustain the war effort against powerful, industrialized Germany. Russian manpower was vast. Russian industry, however, lacked the capacity to arm, equip, and supply the some......

Words: 1659 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Why Did the 1905 Revolution Fail

...were easily little worry for the tsar. The chief driving force of the 1905 Revolution was the main population, the peasants. But this class were not properly led by the political parties to seize power. Both the Social Democrats and Social Revolutionaries had wrong conceptions of the role they should take in the 1905 Revolution. They believed that the middle class revolution should take over the socialist revolution and that they should wait for the liberals to establish a middle class government in 1905. Thus they did not make use of the potential revolutionary strength of the masses to capture power from the Tzarist government as soon as the 1905 Revolution broke out. But the Liberals were too weak in number that they could not become an independent political force to replace the Tzarist government. The tsar then, could easily repress them The political programmes of the political parties failed to secure wholehearted support from the masses because their programmes did not represent the wishes of the masses. The Liberals did not include social and economic reforms in their programme. The programme of the Social Democrats spoke in favour of the establishment of a Socialist State through a class struggle but few of the workers understood revolutionary theories and they just wanted a better economic livelihood. The Social Revolutionaries wished for the control of land, or at least have a say in how it is run, but the peasants just wanted the division of large estates among......

Words: 460 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Why Did the 1905 Revolution Fail

...Why did the 1905 revolution fail? One of the main reasons that the 1905 revolution failed was because the October Manifesto merely only satisfied the middle classes’ appetite for reform. However this was only a short term change in government therefore it was not really a revolution because the changes were not permanent. To add, the readiness of the liberals to accept the government’s political and economical bribes indicted that they were not genuinely ready for a revolution at this time. Furthermore the duma did not have as much power as the tsar portrayed them to have. They were not able to pass laws and did not have any control on the state’s finance. To add, another reason why the 1905 revolution failed was because after the strong opposition shown by the first two Dumas, the tsar took away the vote from the people who wanted more change and also opposed the tsar. As a result of this, the electoral system was weighed in favour of the wealthy and those who supported the tsar. The tsar made a conscious decision to make sure that the third and fourth dumas were less openly obstructive and supportive of the tsar as they were keen to project an image of Russia as a democratic nation. This show’s why the 1905 revolution failed because the October Manifesto was not effective enough to cause an effective revolution Another main reason why the 1905 revolution failed was because of the Tsarist Government. They were highly effective in dispersing the revolution, whilst...

Words: 746 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

How Did the Tsar Survive the 1905 Revolution?

...How did the Tsar survive the 1905 Revolution? The Russian revolution of 1905 was triggered by the event of “Bloody Sunday” and continued to escalate with various protests against the Tsar’s refusal to make political concessions and an accumulation of economic factors like poor working conditions, high taxes and famine. There were numerous aspects which contributed to Tsar Nicholas II surviving the 1905 Revolution. Collectively these enabled the Tsar to survive, however the most significant of these was the loyalty of the Russian army during the period. Without the reliance he had upon the Army, the Tsar may not have been ultimately successful in surviving the revolution. The army remaining loyal to Tsar Nicholas was indeed crucial to him keeping his power, as they were able to majorly control the opposing threats; the disturbances throughout Russia were crushed by the army. For example December saw an armed uprising in Moscow, largely involving the Bolsheviks; this revolt resulted in over 1000 people being killed as Tsarist soldiers controlled the situation. Loyal units identified in the army were used to close down the St Petersburg Soviet that represented 96 factories, while mutinies within the army were met with brutal suppression. Through the use of the army, over the next year the Tsarist Government were able to overpower all revolutionary activity. Their actions included the killing and exportation of thousands of workers, beating up children, arrest of thousands......

Words: 1048 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

How Have Some Chinese Companies Achieved Success in Foreign Markets?

...How have some Chinese companies achieved success in foreign markets? 1.Introduction China is a sleeping dragon, who will tremble the world if she awakes. (Teagarden and Cai, 2009, P73). Since China open the door to welcome the world in 1978, many companies start to be built up, and the economy of the country becomes better and better. 2001,China joined WTO, which enable China move forward in the road of globalization. And now, the western country and America can not ignore this huge “thing”, they start to realize the importance of cooperating with China. This essay will discuss what successes have some Chinese companies achieved and how they made it. 2.Examples of Chinese companies There are many Chinese companies seeking for opportunities to make a step overseas, and Lenovo is one of the most successful one. According to Teagarden and Cai (2009, P74), Lenovo is a brand funded by an engineer named Liu Chuanzhi and other 10 engineers who are following him. Lenovo started its business from producing personal computer. Now, it occupy the first place of Chinese and the fourth place of the world’s personal computer manufacturer. And the second example is Huawei, Teagarden and Cai (2009, P74) state that the previous army officer Ren Zhengfei creates Huawei in 1988. This company is focus on manufacturing software and hardware of telecommunications equipment. Besides, they have many labs in India, America and Russia; they consider the research in the technology is the......

Words: 523 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Referring to a Stretch of Coast You Have Studied, Explain How and Why Some Coasts Are Under Threat from Economic Development (10 Marks)

...Referring to a stretch of coast you have studied, explain how and why some coasts are under threat from economic development (10 Marks) Some coasts such as Southampton could be considered under threat from economic development due to the fact it is extremely reliant on nearby industries, but has an extent biodiverse environment. Southampton is known to have advantages for industry as it is sheltered from storms in the English Channel, deep water for large ships and lots of flat land for development. However there is a large amount of pressure on Southampton, the majority of the pressure being based around Southampton’s water; along its western edge is a large area of salt marsh where industrial development has taken place for Fawleys oil refinery. The oil refinery is the largest in the UK, located on the Solent because it is convenient for tankers travelling to and from Europe. Although this is a large advantage for Southampton, the oil refinery causes problems and potentially causes threat to the coast as it damages it in many ways; mainly from oil spills. Oil spills, such as the one that occurred in October 1989, suffocate the surrounding environment by poisoning the food chain, blocking sunlight from sea vegetation and ruing the natural habitat. Moreover, as a secondary affect, it was reported that cleaning the spill can actually cause further damage to the environment. Metal pollution is a problem in Southampton water also. The paints that are used to stop organisms......

Words: 474 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

How, and Why, Have Conservatives Objected to Social Equality?

...Traditional conservatives have objected to social equality on the grounds that society is organic and naturally hierarchical. Social equality is therefore undesirable and unachievable, as power, status and property are always unequally distributed. Conservatives agree with liberals in accepting natural inequality among individuals; some are born with talents and skills that are denied to others. Hierarchy is an inevitable feature of an organic society, not merely a consequence of individual differences. Pre-democratic conservatives such as Burke embraced the idea of ‘natural aristocracy’ (the idea that talent and leadership are innate qualities that cannot be acquired through effort or self-advancement). Society is composed of a collection of different groups, bodies and institutions, each with its own role and purpose, just as the body is composed of a collection of different and 'unequal' organs. One Nation conservatives have further argued that the natural inequality of wealth and social position is justified by a corresponding inequality of social responsibilities, as the wealthy and prosperous have a social duty to look after the less well-off- noblesse oblige. Thus conservatives are often associated with the idea of paternalism. Conservatives have also objected to social equality because of the emphasis they put on authority. Unlike the liberals who believe that authority is established by the individuals for their own benefits, conservatives’ belief that......

Words: 383 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

How and Why Have Multiculturalists Supported Minority Rights

...How and why have multiculturalists supported minority rights? Minority rights, otherwise referred to as multicultural rights are rights given to minority groups such as ethnic or religious. They are special in two ways; 1. They are established to certain groups. 2. They offer advantages to certain groups. INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM – INDIVIDUAL SELF-RESPECT + CULTURAL MEMBERSHIP: One reason as to why multiculturalists may agree with minority rights is that it advances individual freedom, this is supported by liberal multiculturalist Charles Taylor who saw a link between individual self-respect and culture membership. Therefore, culture is vital for minorities to live an autonomous life and hence minority rights must be safeguarded. PREVENTS OPRESSION – FAILURE OF RECOGNITION + CULTURAL IMPERIALISM: A second reason is the argument that it prevents oppression. It is possible that a state can harm their citizens by ignoring their cultural identity – a process Charles Taylor calls failure of recognition therefore, there must be minority rights to avoid cultural imperialism (domination) by the host country. REDUCES SOCIAL INJUSTICE – AFRICAN AMERICANS SOCIAL DISCRIMIBATION: Lastly, the argument that minority rights reduce social injustice is supported by multiculturalists. Such examples the underrepresentation of cultural groups. This is done through positive discrimination as evident with black Americans in 1978 with the case of University of California v Bakke where......

Words: 261 - Pages: 2