Traditional Litigation vs. Alternative Dispute Resolutions

In: Business and Management

Submitted By cdero4luv99
Words 716
Pages 3
Traditional Litigation versus Alternative Dispute Resolutions
Carla deRomano
Bus. Law 531
October 3, 2011
Professor Gray

Traditional Litigation vs. Alternative Dispute Resolutions Traditional litigation is the process of resolving disputes in the civil court system which is based on the adversarial approach a head-to-head battle in which one individual wins and the other individual loses. However now more commonly found in many cases is the utilization of Alternative Dispute Resolutions, also known as ADR. This discussion will briefly compare and contrast the traditional litigation with the nontraditional forms of ADR. Traditional litigation requires that a complaint be filed with the court, and then the plaintiff has a time period in which to respond to the complaint. This is usually followed by a pre-trial and then a trial in which each party is allowed to present their side of the case and either a jury or judge reaches a final decision as to the outcome of these proceedings. With this form of litigation there can be a high amount of time and costs involved for each of the parties concerned as well as the stress and emotional upheaval that can result during this process. Alternative dispute resolution can be much more efficient and less expensive than these traditional for of litigation. (Barron, 2011). Alternative dispute resolution can be achieved by utilizing a number of different approaches. Some of these approaches may include negotiation, mediation and arbitration. Negotiation is when two or more parties meet to find a alternative solution to the dispute ny considering the needs and requirements that each party is hoping to achieve and find a compromise that will allow each party to come away with some or all of what they wanted in each particular situation. (, 2011). Mediation is when a professional neutral…...

Similar Documents

Alternative Dispute Resolution

...Michael Cusick Alternative Dispute Resolution Law and Ethics for Managers January 13, 2011 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) can be used to refer to a variety of methods used to resolve disputes outside the formal court system (Bagley & Savage, 2010). Less expensive and timely than formal trials, an ADR can provide companies with much-needed privacy for discreet matters, help to maintain relations with strategic business partners, and may provide more flexible and creative resolutions to disputes (Clarkson, Cross, Jentz, & Miller, 2004). Negotiation, mediation, and arbitration are the most popular types of ADR (Bagley & Savage, 2010). For the benefit of business managers, this paper will review what is involved in the each ADR process, recommend steps to prepare for each type of action, look at some advantages and/or disadvantages of each, and discuss how legally binding the decided outcome of each ADR may be for the parties involved. One of the most simple and least formal types of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is negotiation. During a negotiation the disputants meet informally, with or without council, to attempt to settle their differences (Bagley & Savage, 2010). In some cases the court may require that the parties attempt to negotiate before a trail to attempt to reach a resolution and will only hear the case if cannot reach an agreement on their own accord (Clarkson, Cross, Jentz, & Miller, 2004). The disputing parties may also......

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Alternative Dispute Resolution

...years. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to a variety of streamlined resolution techniques designed to resolve issues in controversy more efficiently when the normal negotiation process fails. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is an alternative to the Formal Legal System. It is an alternative to litigation. It was being thought of in view of the fact that the Courts are over burdened with cases. The said system emanates from dissatisfaction of many people with the way in which disputes are traditionally resolved resulting in criticism of the Courts, the legal profession and sometimes lead to a sense of alienation from the whole legal system- thus, the need for Alternative Dispute Resolution. With the spread of ADR programs in the developed and developing world, creative uses for and designs for ADR systems are proliferating. Successful programs are improving the lives of individuals and meeting broad societal goals. There is a critical mass of ADR experience, revealing important lessons as to whether, when and how to implement ADR projects. The Concept & its efficacy: “It is the spirit and not the form of law that keeps the justice alive.” LJ Earl Warren The concept of Conflict Management through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) has introduced a new mechanism of dispute resolution that is non adversarial. A dispute is basically ‘lis inter partes’ and the justice dispensation system in India has found an alternative to Adversarial litigation in......

Words: 3549 - Pages: 15

Alternative Dispute Resolutions

...| Alternative Dispute Resolutions | | | Alternative dispute resolutions, known to many as ADR, are methods to resolve conflicts in ways other than legal litigation. “Because litigation is expensive and time-consuming, both [parties] suffer when parties bring their disputes to court. Alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) is an important solution” (Baum, 2010). The four most common methods of ADR are negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and collaborative law. A fifth method, conciliation, sometimes falls into the ADR category. The use of ADRs has been proven to be helpful in many different types of legal disputes from personal to professional (Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), 1995-2013). Alternative dispute resolutions are non-adversarial methods used to successfully manage conflict without the use of unnecessary, expensive litigation. Negotiation Negotiation is the simplest way to settle differences. This method is back and forth communication trying to find a solution to resolve a conflict. The characteristics of negotiation are as followed: private, confidential, voluntary, quick, little to no cost, parties make their own decisions, parties reach agreements, full control, enforceable agreements, win-win solutions (Oklahoma Bar Association, 2012). Negotiation can be done in a number of ways: formal, informal, private, public, directly or with third parties (although third parties typically aren’t necessary). It can happen any time, any place. ......

Words: 1572 - Pages: 7

Alternative Dispute Resolution

...Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Clause University Of Phoenix LAW-531PR Business Law   Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause When working in team conflicts are inevitable but determine how to resolve them is vital. The Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause (ADR) is an alternative to solve internal conflicts in an organization, avoiding going to court, thus resulting in savings of money and time to the organization. We will work on this occasion the ADR based on student teamwork. We will determine the possible scenarios of conflict and provisions to work them. In commercial litigation, the normal business operations of the parties are often disrupted. To avoid or reduce these problems, businesses are increasingly turning to methods of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and other aids to resolving disputes. The most common form of ADR is arbitration. Other forms of ADR are negotiation, mediation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding, and using a judicial referee (Cheeseman, 2010). The controversies can arise as a result of the following factors: team members do not attend meetings (absenteeism), non participation in team discussions, not presenting a task deadline, disrespectful and unethical behavior such as plagiarism, comment offensive, inappropriate language and lack of respect for diversity team. The team will determine a prudent time to resolve the conflict; an example might be a 24-hour period. If the period is not sufficient enters the ADR function......

Words: 373 - Pages: 2

Alternative Dispute Resolution

...Running Header: Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) offers parties alternative means of resolving their differences outside actual courtroom litigation and the costly aspects of preparation for it (Jennings, 2006). When speaking of alternative dispute resolution in a team environment, there will always be slight disagreements that may arise. Alternative Dispute Resolution is enabled when the disagreements are not settled within a day or so. Such disputes should be settled by peer review and or mediation. All team members have to agree to participate in the ADR and they will not be forced to participate. Participation, turning in assignments on time, group attendance, learning team goals, conflict management, and ground rules are usually established at the beginning of a class by the team. If disputes arise in a group they should be addressed within the team and if no solution, the instructor, who becomes the mediator, is needed. The mediator is only there to keep order within the team and to assist with the team coming to an agreement. Once the problem arises, the mediator will then speak with each team member to obtain his or her position. The mediator will only listen and not provide his or her opinion during this mediation. He or she is there to help the team agree on a solution. When the group in the mediation process does not meet a solution, I would suggest the peer......

Words: 389 - Pages: 2

Alternative Dispute Resolution

...Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") processes are alternative methods of helping people resolve legal problems before going to court. ADR involves an independent third person, called a "neutral" who tries to help resolve or narrow the areas of conflict. Most civil disputes are resolved without filing a lawsuit, and most civil lawsuits are resolved without a trial. The courts and others offer a variety of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) processes to help people resolve disputes without a trial. ADR is usually less formal, less expensive, and less time-consuming than a trial. ADR is generally classified into at least four types: negotiation, collaborative law, mediation, and arbitration. Negotiation is a dialogue between two or more people or parties, intended to reach an understanding, resolve point of difference, or gain advantage in outcome of dialogue. Negotiation is intended to aim at compromise. Collaborative law (also called collaborative practice, divorce, or family law) is a legal process enabling couples who have decided to separate or end their marriage to work with their lawyers. The voluntary process is initiated when the couple signs a contract (called the "participation agreement"), binding each other to the process and disqualifying their respective lawyer's right to represent either one in any future family related litigation. Mediation, as used in law, is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), a way of resolving disputes between......

Words: 1198 - Pages: 5

Alternative Dispute Resolution

...Working in teams can be easy or difficult. If the rules and instructions are clearly outlined, the team will have high performance and the leader will not need to get involved. An Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) clause is the most efficient way to resolve a dispute. According to Jennings (2006), alternative dispute resolution (ADR) offers parties alternative means of resolving their differences outside actual courtroom litigation and the costly aspects of preparation for it. An ADR clause can also be used by a learning team to resolve disagreements among members. I will outline an ADR in the clause, define disputes subject to ADR and identify provisions necessary to enable ADR to occur in a learning team. Dispute Resolution. Should the following disputes arise within the learning team (team member fails to submit an assignment or individual portion of an assignment by the predetermined deadline date, team member is not participating in group discussions, team member made offensive comments to other members and/or team member(s) have an internal conflict) that cannot be resolved 24 hours after the dispute began will enable ADR to occur. In the event a dispute shall arise between members of the learning team, the members agree to participate in a mediated negotiation with the professor of the course. Mediation will involve all learning team members and course professor. Mediation will not be formal and due to time constraints, various locations of members and online......

Words: 283 - Pages: 2

Alternative Dispute Resolution

...months and sometimes even years, as a result, it is now commonplace to use Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) to resolve these disputes. More agreements often contain mandatory arbitration provisions that are legally binding and enforceable. In addition, almost every court or administrative agency empowered to hear cases now requires mediation as part of the formal adjudication process (Spangler, 2003). Abstract: Arbitration plays a crucial role in commercial procurement. Ideally, solid contractual agreements would alleviate disputes between parties. In most cases, disputes result from the terms of the contract rather than the actual contract itself. Arbitration offers dispute resolution that eliminates the need for costly litigation and time-consuming disputes in the courtroom. This paper considers the role of arbitration in contracted procurement. Additionally, it considers alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as a whole as arbitration is a subset of ADR and will discuss their relative advantages and disadvantages in comparison with traditional litigation. The aged concept of arbitration has recently begun to reach tremendous levels of popularity in the acquisition realm. defines arbitration as, “the hearing and determining of a dispute or the settling of differences between parties by a person or persons chosen or agreed to by them”. Solving disputes through arbitration is by no means a modern concept. The first......

Words: 2406 - Pages: 10

Alternative Dispute Resolution

...Alternative Dispute Resolution Name: Institution Affiliation: Introduction Alternative dispute resolution is a method for settling parties' disagreements outside of court's antagonistic setting. Today, ADRs are greatly compelling to the point that courts frequently oblige parties to seek after this plan B before disputing their cases. Both arbitration and mediation may be court-requested. Settling one's dispute through components outside to the court structure may spare one time and cash. In the last twenty-five years, since Australia held onto multiculturalism as an approach, issues of intercultural correspondence have ended up more noticeable in the working environment. On the other hand, until as of late, little had been composed on these issues, and even now, numerous authoritative managers have no preparation. They as well have no learning of how to manage correspondence problems, despite the fact that most workplaces are staffed by individuals of diverse cultures. The report examines these three issue areas and shows that a considerable lot of the difficulties confronted by migrants in the workforce are caused by the absence of awareness of, and preparing in, intercultural correspondence. Why clients should be encouraged to use ADR and Implications Clients ought to be encouraged to make use of these alternative methods for solving conflicts for a number of reasons. ADR can permit access to justice. Case in point, as there can be cost......

Words: 3050 - Pages: 13

Alternative Dispute Resolution

...Alternative Dispute Resolution Law / 531 August 17, 2015 Jonathan Jamieson Quality Court Condominium Association versus Quality Hill Development Corporation is a dispute over damages associated with neglect in the construction of condominiums. The legal form of business of Quality Hill Development is a limited liability corporation. Quality Court Condominium Association is a group of condominium owners that came together to file suit against the construction company that caused all these damages. Another example of an Alternative Dispute Resolution case is Walls vs. Brewster. It was an example in February 1993 referred to arbitration because the case was ordered to a court annexed arbitration. This case is not a normal alternative dispute resolution. Alternate Dispute Resolution is normally a lot quicker than a full court litigation but this one was anything but that. It took a long time to complete because of there were two time extensions added to accommodate the defendant's inability to be present. Elective ADR is that which facilitates a discussion, which usually turns into a negotiation, but which does not produce a finding or judgment which can be imposed on either party. By elective ADR the parties will provide themselves with a forum in which to air their differences, but whether or not to settle them remains within their control (Griffiths 2010). Alternative Dispute Resolution is a more efficient system used to offer solutions to a dispute......

Words: 894 - Pages: 4

Alternative Dispute Resolution

...Alternative Dispute Resolution The Employer’s Secret Quola-Kito Davis University of Phoenix Abstract This paper will explore the legal description of Grocer’s Supply Incorporated. It will explore how the case of Quola-Kito Davis v. Grocer’s Supply Incorporated & Mitsubishi Forklift case was processed through the court system and detail the method of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) which was used, as opposed to litigation that may have occurred. In conclusion, it will survey the differences in expenditures and advantages of traditional litigation as compared to Alternative Dispute Resolution in this specific case. Alternative Dispute Resolution The Employer’s Secret Alternative Dispute Resolution is any processes of resolving issues without the use of traditional litigation. It involves negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. As courts begin to become backlogged coupled with the increasing expenses associated with litigations more companies have begun implementing ADR agreements. Some ADR agreements are voluntary while others are mandatorily written into contracts and employment agreements. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is a method which aids companies and/or individuals settle disputes without having to utilize traditional litigation. The ADR procedures are inclusive of arbitration, mediation, and unbiased assessment utilizing the law concerning those matters issues. ADR are less formal and less taxing; in addition, they are confidential......

Words: 605 - Pages: 3

Alternative Dispute Resolution

...Alternative Dispute Resolution Kevin L. Bailey Jr. Law 531 October 4, 2015 Susan Purvin Case Overview A recent Wisconsin state court ruling on employee/employer contract disputes set the precedent for future contract disputes and arbitration (Engel, 2012). The court decided that a wrongful termination lawsuit brought on by an executive employee of Merge Healthcare had merit even though a written employee contract had an arbitration clause for any legal disputes. W. Mortimore, the former chief executive officer of Merge Healthcare Inc., alleged wrongful termination and sought severance payments as well as benefits and payment for legal expenses incurred as part of the lawsuit. The company claimed that Mortimore resigned after an independent investigation into Merge’s financial statements proved fraudulent. In the lawsuit, Mortimore claimed that he was forced to resign or face termination; the firing was improper because Mortimore felt the allegations which led to his termination were unfounded (Engel, 2012). The main issue was Mortimore’s claim that an oral contract, which didn’t include any arbitration provisions should be held to the same standard as a written employment contract which did include a mandatory arbitration clause. The court’s decision pushed the issue back to arbitration stating its decision clarifies that if an employee challenges the legitimacy of a contract, the dispute must be arbitrated. Differences between cost and Benefits Court......

Words: 799 - Pages: 4

Alternative Dispute Resolution

...Alternative Dispute Resolution Analysis Paper University Of Phoenix LAW / 531 Date: 10/05/2015 MEMORANDUM. TO: Singh and Jessica FROM: Karandeep Singh RE: Disagreement concerning Singh and Jessica in the corporation of an outfitting store. DATE: 10/03/2015. FACTS: Singh and Jessica are trade partners of an outfit and merchandising store, and they entered into a formal contract. Jessica had to reduce her working day to take care for her newborn therefore reacting to her decision Singh hired a well-educated employee and reduced Jessica’s turnover without even informing her. In obstruction, Jessica sealed the corporation account with Singh, and she opened a different sole signatory account for her. I think the particular instance can cause a State Tribunal though the legal phase for the case will originate with small claims court. If Singh and Jessica will not able to do a settlement in small claims court, then the case can proceed to the states appeals court and can lead all the way to Supreme Court. Although, most claim filed in small claims courts come to a settlement, but it is difficult to solve the issues in the court system in order to decrease the cost and a long trial mediation and most commonly responsive solutions for parties. I am listing the few available options solving disputes between business partners, shareholders of business entities, and managing members. Litigation Litigation is the......

Words: 794 - Pages: 4

Alternative Disputes Resolution

...Alternative Dispute Resolution The case of Fulcher vs, 24 Hour Fitness Tinisha Johnson Professor Shannon Allen Law 531 When a business is sued by a current or former employee, customer or other third party that business can either take that case to trial or try to solve the issue by going through an alternative dispute resolution process or ADR. By addressing grievances through ADR a business will be able to solve the matter in a mutual agreeable way that save money and time. Also it reduces the risk of negative public scrutiny or loss of public trust or reputation. Here I will discuss the case of Fulcher vs 24 Hour Fitness. I will discuss the difference between the processes of going to trail versus dealing with the issue through an ADR, the cost benefits of solving issues through ADR. I will also recommend an ADR that would best fit the situation 24 Hour Fitness is one of the most known largest fitness chains. The company is privately owned and currently has employees 18,000 employee within the US and Philippines. The company is currently based in San Ramon, California. In July of 2010 the company was sued for race and gender violations. The suit that was filed in the Alameda County Superior Court by Raoul Fulcher a former employee of the company. Fulcher alleges that the company engages in a practice of discrimination against its minority and female employees by denying them deserved promotions with the company. The case was filed in July 2010 and there......

Words: 1160 - Pages: 5

Traditional and Nontraditional Litigation: Litigation and Alternatives Video

...Arbitration Arbitration is a method of conflict resolution that allows the parties in conflict to present their case to a neutral third-party subject expert. Because arbitration is an alternative to traditional litigations, the proceedings are less formal, and because the proceedings are less formal, the rules can be altered to meet the needs of the needs of parties. Unlike traditional litigation, the arbitration process is quick, and the matter is handled privately whereas traditional litigation is public record. It is important to understand that although arbitration is less formal, less expensive than traditional litigation, and private, arbitration is adversarial; only one side will win (Chessman, 2010). Because it is highly unlikely that Quick Take Video and Nonlinear Pro will maintain a professional relationship, arbitration is a viable option for settling the contract dispute between the two parties. Both sides can jointly agree on the arbitrator and each side is permitted to have legal counsel help with the case. Arbitration allows each side to minimize lost work hours defending the claim because the meetings are scheduled at times mutually agreeable to the parties. By agreement, arbitration may be binding meaning that the decision of the arbitrator is final or nonbinding, which allows the decision to be appealed to a higher court (Chessman, 2010). The Advantages of Mediation Mediation is a form of conflict resolution in which a neutral third-party helps......

Words: 858 - Pages: 4