Premium Essay

Smana and the Hog

In: English and Literature

Submitted By Purkin13
Words 341
Pages 2
2
Deal Cutting. Occasionally leaders are so desperate to resolve a problem that they make unethical or even illegal deals. Rather than holding an employee accountable to do the right thing, the boss turns a blind eye to an infraction, and then rewards the employee with an unofficial perk.
“I tell you what, you can do whatever you want this afternoon.
Just finish the job by noon.”
Implied in this deal is the following. “I know you’d finish on time if you put in any effort at all, but you’re not really trying.
I don’t want to deal with that right now, so I’ll let you loaf for four hours if you’ll only do what you’re supposed to do in the first place.”
Once you’ve cut this kind of deal, you’ve sold your soul. Since you’ve done something unethical, against policy, or illegal, the other person now “has the goods on you.” Leaders who’ve fallen into this trap have a horrible time regaining respect and control. They typically have to be transferred to a new area with new direct reports before they’re able to handle routine problems without having to offer an undeserved reward.
9
“February 14, 2 P.M.—Raised my right eyebrow three centimeters. Analyst nodded knowingly and reworked the calculations.”
Passing the Buck. Some leaders erroneously believe that they can play the role of “good cop.” All they have to do is turn their own boss into the “bad cop.” By being the “good guy,” they believe that they’re more likely to stay on civil terms with their direct reports. Here’s the kind of stunt they pull:
“I know you don’t want to stay late, but the big guy says if you don’t we’ll have to write you up. If I had my way, we’d all go home early for the holiday weekend.”
This strategy is disloyal, dishonest, and ineffective. Anyone with an IQ greater than that of a sea sponge can see through it.
Nothing undermines your authority more than blaming…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Harley Davidsen Brand Management Mba Case Study

...HARLEY-DAVIDSON HOG CASE STUDY BRAND MANAGEMENT 6M:223:EXC SUMMER 2010 Introduction After near extinction Harley-Davidson has become one of the premier motorcycle manufacturers and distributors in the world. A primary driver in this success has been their attention to building the Harley-Davidson brand with attention to customer loyalty, specifically with the creation of a brand community of customers – the Harley Owners Group (HOG). Through HOG they have been able to connect with customers at the grass-roots level. Their sponsorship of regional and national HOG events has provided them with one-on-one access to their customers, resulting in strong, favorable, and unique associations for the Harley-Davidson brand. In this case study we will address several key questions/issues: 1) Evaluate the Harley-Davidson strategy and performance in getting close to their customers 2) Determine the HOG role in developing community for the Harley-Davidson brand 3) Provide ideas on how HOG can be maximized, including how the Posse Ride should be positioned among the mix of activities 4) Indicate what steps can be taken to maximize the effectiveness and profitability of the Posse Ride, and other HOG events Harley-Davidson and the Customer Experience There is no consumer community that is more passionate about a product than that of Harley-Davidson owners. Through HOG-sponsored rides and rallies there is a sense of togetherness and challenge, which creates......

Words: 1201 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Environmental Injustice in Mississippi

...Environmental Injustice in Mississippi Lisa Matthews Something stinks in Mississippi, and it’s not the high number of hog farms that are in that state although those swine farms do have something to do with it. A recent study found something alarming and frankly sickening; the location of pig farms in correlation to neighborhoods that were primarily African-American and low-income families. Mississippi is one of the poorest states in the country, but due to its ample land the swine industry is one of its biggest suitors. When many of the nations large-scale packers went out of business, companies like Bryan Foods increased its packaging business in the state. The swine industry is booming in Mississippi. But what does that do for the residents who live near these farms? Think of the implications? Have you every driven by a swine farm? I have, and I want to get away from the area as quickly as possibly, I cannot imagine having to live near one. In the 1990’s Mississippi had just two swine farms that housed over 1,000 animals, but in a ten year period that number jumped to 60. That’s a lot of pigs! Citizens are concerned and rightly so. Research has proven that pork production can be harmful to the ecosystem and to humans. Hog waste is collected and stored in deep pits, cesspools and lagoons. Hog waste releases gasses that include: * Ammonia * Hydrogen sulfide * Volatile organic compounds * Particulates These contaminates can cause many health......

Words: 597 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Three Little Pigs Case Solution

...Case 04-4 Three Little Pigs, Inc. Research Response Three Little Pigs, Inc. (PIGS) is a provider of live hogs and pork products. They classify inventory into three distinct categories: live hogs ready for sale, developing animals, and processed pork products. They have always evaluated inventory at cost because the wholesale price has always exceeded the cost of bringing the products to the market. Now, due to several factors, PIGS believes that they may have a lower of cost or market issue related to valuing some of the hogs. 1) Does PIGS need to write-down inventory? 2) What approach should be used for the write-down (by category, total, end category, etc.)? Does PIGS need to write-down inventory? PIGS has evidence that predicted futures prices for the months of October 2002 – January 2003 will fall below the cost of production for a hog. Where there is evidence that the utility of goods will be less than cost the difference is recognized in the current period (ASC 330-10-35-1). A write-down is generally required unless the decline is due to seasonal price fluctuations (ASC 330-10-55-2). Though, Farmer Joe believes this is just a seasonal fluctuation, there is not enough evidence in the case to support that claim. There are no examples of this happening in prior years. The one reason that is given for the price decrease is the capture of the Big Bad Wolf, which led to an increase in the supply of pork. This appears to be an unusual event that would not......

Words: 746 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Harley-Davidson, Inc. V Grottanelli

...Supp.2d 544 (2000) HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC., Plaintiff, v. Ronald GROTTANELLI, d/b/a The Hog Farm, Defendant. No. 93-CV-144M. United States District Court, W.D. New York. March 24, 2000. Michael, Best & Friedrich, Dyann L. Kostello, Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiff. Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine & Huber, Peter K. Sommer, Buffalo, NY, for defendant. Harley-Davidson, Inc. v Grottanelli Harley-Davidson, Inc. v Grottanelli was heard before the court in October 21 through 24, 1996. A decision and order was entered March 20, 1997 in which it was found that the defendant was entitled to use the term “Hog Farm” in regards to the conduct of its business. Harley-Davidson, Inc. was entitled to a permanent injunction with respect to its “Bar and Shield” and “Hog” trademarks. On April 9, 1997, the defendant moved to amend the courts findings and to amend the order from March 20, 1997. In addition, the defendant moved to amend the pleadings to conform with the evidence and for entry of judgment in his favor. In a judgment filed October 1, 1997, the court denied the motions and enjoined his use of the plaintiff’s “Bar and Shield” and “Hog” trademarks. The parties then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit were the court upheld the judgment as to the “Bar and Shield” trademarks, but reversed and remanded as to the “Hog” trademarks. The court found that “hog” is a generic term and the presumption of validity cannot protect a mark that is......

Words: 713 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Accounting

...recover within the year. PIGS inventories consists of the following: live hogs to be internally processed, developing animals to be internally processed, internally processed pork products, live hogs to be sold to a third party, and developing animals to be sold to a third party. The question of impairment applies only to the live hogs and developing animals to be sold to a third party because it is believed that internally processed pork products will be able to cover the costs of live hogs and developing animals to be processed internally. Question: How should the Company determine whether an inventory impairment exists at September 30, 2002? More specifically, how should management evaluate impairment? Response: ASC 330-10-35-2 states that, “in accounting for inventories, a loss shall be recognized whenever the utility of goods is impaired by damage, deterioration, obsolescence, changes in price level, or other causes.” In PIGS case they should recognize a loss because the utility of their live hogs to be sold to a third party and their developing animals to be sold to a third party have suffered from a decrease in price level. When determining whether inventory should be evaluated for impairment under the lower of cost or market method or on a total inventory basis, ASC 905-330-35-2 states, “developing animals to be held for sale shall be valued at lower of cost or market.” As for the live hogs to sold to a third party, ASC 905-330-35-3 states that unless the......

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Little Pigs

... live hogs for sale, and developing animals. * Inventory be evaluated for impairment under the lower of cost or market method based on end product category, such as separating inventory into two groups: • nternal live hogs & developing animals to be processed are combined with processed pork products • Developing animals and live hogs sold to third parties in another group * Inventory evaluated for impairment on some other basis not described above Codification: 330-10-35 A departure from the cost basis of pricing the inventory is required when the utility of the goods is no longer as great as their cost. Where there is evidence that the utility of goods, in their disposal in the ordinary course of business, will be less than cost, whether due to physical deterioration, obsolescence, changes in prices levels, or other causes, the differences shall be recognized as a loss of the current period. This is generally accomplished by stating such goods at lower level commonly designated as market (asc.fasb.org). PIGS should determine that an inventory impairment exists by recognizing that on September 30, 2009 the carrying cost for “the developing animals to be sold to third parties” is $31 for October 2009, while the future price for “lean hogs/cwt” for October 2009 is $29. PIGS have three alternatives for measuring the impairment: (a.) on a total inventory basis method, (b.) on a total live-inventory basis, and (c.) on a live-inventory basis, but only the hogs that......

Words: 997 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Business Analyssis

...recover within the year. PIGS inventories consists of the following: live hogs to be internally processed, developing animals to be internally processed, internally processed pork products, live hogs to be sold to a third party, and developing animals to be sold to a third party. The question of impairment applies only to the live hogs and developing animals to be sold to a third party because it is believed that internally processed pork products will be able to cover the costs of live hogs and developing animals to be processed internally. Question: How should the Company determine whether an inventory impairment exists at September 30, 2002? More specifically, how should management evaluate impairment? Response: ASC 330-10-35-2 states that, “in accounting for inventories, a loss shall be recognized whenever the utility of goods is impaired by damage, deterioration, obsolescence, changes in price level, or other causes.” In PIGS case they should recognize a loss because the utility of their live hogs to be sold to a third party and their developing animals to be sold to a third party have suffered from a decrease in price level. When determining whether inventory should be evaluated for impairment under the lower of cost or market method or on a total inventory basis, ASC 905-330-35-2 states, “developing animals to be held for sale shall be valued at lower of cost or market.” As for the live hogs to sold to a third party, ASC 905-330-35-3 states that unless the......

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Case Memo

...Titan Union Accountants Titan Union Accountants Memorandum To: Farmer Joe, CEO, Three Little Pigs, Inc. (PIGS) From: Accounting Consultant Subject: Assessment of Impairment Date: January 1, 2003 I. Facts During this fiscal year, with the capture of the Big Bad Wolf, there is an increase of supply of pork and the market price of pork is on the decline. Although the market price for hogs is forecasted to stabilize within the year, Three Little Pigs, Inc. (PIGS) is dealt with the dilemma of whether they should impair their inventory of hogs, effective September 30, 2002. With three categories of hog inventory (live hogs for sale, developing animals, and processed pork products), PIGS is only considering to impair their inventories of live hogs and developing animals to be sold to third parties at market prices. Concerning processed pork prices, they are believed to be sufficient to cover production costs. II. Issues Management refuses to write off their inventory as they believe future stabilized prices will cover the losses from the previous quarters. However, specific scenarios must be evaluated to decide what the best solution is for PIGS to efficiently report their inventory. The issue is whether impairment should exist at September 30, 2002. If impairment shall exist, the question remains whether the impairment would be evaluated under the lower cost or market method on a total inventory basis, category basis, end product basis, or on an......

Words: 973 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Ace 427 Homework 1

...website and collect the US monthly average price received for hogs from January 1960 – November 2015. A downloadable Excel file with the data can be found at this link: http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/manage/uspricehistory/us_price_history.html. The link for the price data is at the bottom of the purple area of the tool. 1. Produce a line plot of the entire data series on one page. Do your best to format the chart in a useful manner. 2. Produce a scatter plot where x is the previous month hog price and y is the current month hog price. Note you will lose one observation when you construct the series for this plot. In other words, generate a second price column which is the original data lagged by one month, e.g. row #1 Feb 60 Jan 60; row #2 Mar 60 Feb 60, and so on. Show the regression of y on x on the chart along with the equation and R2. 3. Generate the monthly change in hog prices. Simply subtract last month’s price from this month’s price. 4. Produce a scatter plot where x is the previous change in the monthly hog price and y is the current change in the monthly hog price. Note you will lose two observations when you construct the series for this plot. Show the regression of y on x on the chart along with the equation and R2. 5. Discussion: a. What does the plot in #2 suggest about the predictability of monthly hog prices? b. What does the plot in #4 suggest about the predictability of monthly hog prices? c. How can the two predictability results be......

Words: 350 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Paylean in Market Swine

...“we don’t ask how to make a pig happy, we ask how to grow it faster, fatter, bigger, cheaper, and that’s not a noble goal” (Salatin, 2015). Technology is slowly beginning to take over the world around us and is affecting everything that people do, from what they eat to what they wear. As the world continues to advance, more concerns and discussions about what is taking place in the world around us keep surfacing in everyday conversations. Pork producers typically have the same common goal of efficiently producing lean, quality pork in order to keep the pork industry strong and vibrant when compared to other animal products. With this new goal in mind, the meat production industry has led to the top choice being an overall more lean market hog, and many people believe that feeding Paylean® will help pork producers achieve this common goal, in turn saving the pork industry. A common discussion in the agricultural industry today is the usage of Paylean® in market pigs. Although this substance has been around since the early 2000s, some people believe it is not well-digested by pigs, it affects the health of the pig, and it changes the flavor of the pork that humans consume. Therefore, Paylean® has become quite a controversial product, with some believing it should be an illegal substance, especially in the market swine show industry. A common feed additive in the swine show industry today is a substance called Paylean®. Paylean® is a very popular feed additive that improves......

Words: 3727 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Case: Three Little Pigs Inc

...Summary of facts Three Little Pigs, Inc. (PIGS), is a vertically-integrated provider of pork products that produces approximately 4.1 million hogs per year. The company mainly deals with wholesale and retail food service and institutional markets in the United States, as well as outside third parties. PIGS classify their hog inventory into three major categories: live hogs ready for sale, developing animals, and processed pork products. Management believes that there is no lower cost of market issue related to the hogs that are processed within their own company. Unfortunately the hogs that are sold to the third party spot markets have experienced a decline in their market price and in some months it isn’t enough to cover the carrying cost. However management also thinks that in the long run revenue will exceed total cost and there may not need to be a temporary impairment to inventory. Even though the price is varying from month to month their expecting that the revenue will cover all the cost of the inventory and the hogs sold to third parties. * How should the company determine whether inventory impairment exists at September 30, 2002? More specifically, how should management evaluate impairment? Instead of evaluating for impairment under the lower of cost or market method on a total inventory basis, PIGS should focus on trying to give a complete and clear representation of the company. This may be best done by determining whether inventory impairment exist at......

Words: 958 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Case 04-4: Three Little Pigs, Inc.– Inventory Impairment

...provider of pork products. The Company produces approximately 4.1 million hogs per year; the majority of which are internally processed. However, a portion of the hogs produced are sold to outside third parties. PIGS does not have any commitments to sell live hogs to third parties and it does not hedge its live hogs through commodity futures contracts. PIGS has three major categories of hog inventory: (1) live hogs available for sale; (2) developing animals; and (3) processed pork products. Management is confident that the wholesale price of processed pork products exceeds the cost to bring such products to market. However, spot market prices charged for live hogs sold to third parties have recently declined and are currently below the Company’s cost of producing these hogs. The decline in spot market prices is due to several factors, including the capture of the Big Bad Wolf, which led to an increased supply of pork. As of the second quarter ending September 2002, futures prices for lean hogs indicate a further decline before recovering late in the fourth quarter, as illustrated below: October 2002 $29.00 November 2002 $30.00 December 2002 $33.00 January 2003 $37.00 February 2003 $42.00 March 2003 $45.00 Farmer Joe asserts that the price decline reflected above is the result of seasonality. Currently, the cost of producing a live hog is $38/cwt ($38 per 100 pounds). Therefore, live hogs available for sale are carried at $38/cwt. The carrying cost of......

Words: 1282 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Ace 427 Homework 1

...website and collect the US monthly average price received for hogs from January 1960 – November 2015. A downloadable Excel file with the data can be found at this link: http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/manage/uspricehistory/us_price_history.html. The link for the price data is at the bottom of the purple area of the tool. 1. Produce a line plot of the entire data series on one page. Do your best to format the chart in a useful manner. 2. Produce a scatter plot where x is the previous month hog price and y is the current month hog price. Note you will lose one observation when you construct the series for this plot. In other words, generate a second price column which is the original data lagged by one month, e.g. row #1 Feb 60 Jan 60; row #2 Mar 60 Feb 60, and so on. Show the regression of y on x on the chart along with the equation and R2. 3. Generate the monthly change in hog prices. Simply subtract last month’s price from this month’s price. 4. Produce a scatter plot where x is the previous change in the monthly hog price and y is the current change in the monthly hog price. Note you will lose two observations when you construct the series for this plot. Show the regression of y on x on the chart along with the equation and R2. 5. Discussion: a. What does the plot in #2 suggest about the predictability of monthly hog prices? b. What does the plot in #4 suggest about the predictability of monthly hog prices? c. How can the two predictability results be......

Words: 350 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Manager

...with the removal of Wild Hogs from the big game status to a nuisance category. http://www.tn.gov/twra/feralhog.html This will affect me because I’m an out of state hunter who hunts on private land who purchased a Tennessee hunting license for big game which now does not include Wild Hogs and because I’m not a land owner, family member or tenant it prevents me from hunting Wild Hogs. The property owner is allowed to have up to (10) individuals listed on an exemption form but it is limited when group hunting trips are being planned. 2. The proposal is to have no limit on numbers of individuals that can be on the exemption form for property owners for a fee. This will aid TWRA mission to reduce the Wild Hog populations. 3. Big game hunters should have as much rights as property owners and tenants. The TWRA report and website states that big game hunting is the root cause for the increase in Wild Hog populations and migrations into areas normally not populated with Wild Hogs. If this is truly the case why are landlords and tenants allowed to use the same methods as Wild Hogs hunters to reduce the populations of Wild Hogs? Data collected shows approximately $1.5 billion is lost annually because of wild hog damage, plus there is the potential risk of disease transmission to the local livestock industry. I believe allowing hunters to continue to hunt Wild Hogs and work with TWRA would be better served in controlling the recent populations of Wild Hogs have become to the......

Words: 805 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Re: Paper 1

...increased supply have caused declining prices for live hogs on the spot market. Also as shown bellow futures prices will remain below the carrying cost for live hogs until nearly the end of the fiscal year. However processed pork products such as bacon, loins, and ham remain above the current cost of production. Three Little Pigs Inc. is capable of processing hogs into these products internally at some locations. Unfortunately, not all hogs can be transported and processed at the main processing plants and must be sold as live hogs to third parties at spot market prices. There are four potential alternatives for dealing with the possible need to impair the value of Three Little Pigs Inc.'s inventories. Alternative 1: Continue to carry all inventories at cost basis. ARB28, Par.14c ?Such temporary market declines need not be recognized at the interim date since no loss is expected.? EITF, 86-13 Discussion ?? option 28 requires inventory be written to lower of cost or market unless (1) substantial evidence exists that market prices will recover before the inventory is sold? Write down is generally required unless the decline is due to seasonal pricing fluctuation.? ARB43, Ch.4, Par.9 ?Where evidence indicates that cost will be recovered with an approximately normal profit upon sale in the ordinary course of business, no loss should be recognized...? If it can be determined that the depressed prices for lean hogs are only temporary, inventories could and should be......

Words: 1111 - Pages: 5