Profiting from Punishment

In: Business and Management

Submitted By Namrah13
Words 1275
Pages 6
Profiting from punishment * As punishment is complex social, ideological and cultural terrain, it will never be an entirely rational execution of orders with clear objectives and controllable outcomes. It is has multiple and competing aims and innumerable intended and unintended consequences. In accordance with this Garland has argued “(t)he failure of modern punishment is in part the inevitable outcome of an over rationalized conception of its functions” (1991, p. 12). As prisons enable a society to separate and classify those that it deems to be ‘criminal’, the introduction of privately operated prisons further separates criminals from society because of the shifts this enables in terms of public accountability. In light of this, the ability for a private corporation to profit from nuanced state and social objectives acted out on the body of a citizen could be considered unreasonable and morally repugnant. By no means is it surprising that corporations will act to minimise costs, and cost is an obvious consideration in the delivery of any public sector function but the centrality of cost and the possibility of profit are problematic. * Prisons and penal policy should be focused on broader social objectives and questions that lead to better outcomes for all members of a society, including prisoners, as has been shown, these questions are not enabled within the current accountability arrangements. This is a view supported by Shearer (2002, p. 546) who argued that “when economic entities render accounts of themselves in economic terms, the identity so portrayed and the obligations of the entity with respect to the broader community are both dependent upon the specific conceptions of subjectivity and intersubjectivity that are instantiated by economic discourse”. It has been argued throughout this paper that imprisonment has an undeniable moral component, as…...

Similar Documents

Punishment

...Punishment In Plato’s The Republic, Socrates has many conversations with people in order to further understand concepts such as justice and the way things are ideally supposed to be done. When I think about justice the definition that comes to mind is: the administration of a just action because of an unjust or immoral act being done by a human or group of humans. The issue of proper punishment has also been discussed in those conversations with Socrates and his peers. There must be a punishment for immoral or unjust actions committed by any human otherwise everything in our world would turn into complete chaos. In Socrates’s time people believed heavily in the afterlife and that his or her actions on Earth determined the quality of that life. The gods played a huge role in deciding the fates of everyone depending on how one lived while one was alive. If one lived an unjust and reckless life then it will show because the gods in one’s afterlife will punish him or her. Socrates states, “…bad people are wretched because they are in need of punishment, and that in paying the penalty they are benefited by that god.” There is a problem with waiting until the afterlife for people to be punished because then there would be no order in society. Bad people who are actually bad can get away with living well in the afterlife because during their Earthly life they gained enough wealth to pay the gods to give them a good afterlife. Meanwhile the good people of the world who did a bad...

Words: 1240 - Pages: 5

Punishment

...precursor to another form of punishment but now it is an end in itself. Punishment can be effective either instrumentally or expressively. It can either reduce crime itself or it can be retributive, expressing society’s outrage. Crime can be reduced in three separate ways. Offenders themselves are discouraged from committing future crimes because they don’t want to undergo the punishment again; Mrs Thatcher instigated the ‘short, sharp shock’ regime in young offenders’ institutions in the 1980s. Some states in America go further and make the time in prison physically unpleasant. The rest of the community is deterred because they see the result of criminality. Prison can also bring about reform or rehabilitation of the prisoner through education, training or behaviour modification courses so that the ex-prisoner can integrate successfully into social life on release. Prison also works because the prisoners are not free to commit crimes against the general public. America uses the ‘3 strikes’ rule to remove habitual offenders from the community. Other countries use other forms of punishment to incapacitate offenders. America also uses the death sentence, a rather permanent solution, chemical castration for sex offenders and Muslim countries, in particular, still remove the hands of thieves so they cannot steal. At times the focus is on rehabilitation and the reduction of future crime, at others societies seem to be keener on punishment for its own sake. Offenders...

Words: 680 - Pages: 3

Punishment

...your actions and making amends are the best things for all involved as well as the community. Restorative justice is different from contemporary criminal justice in several ways. One of the differences is that it views crime more comprehensively, rather than defining crime as simply lawbreaking, it helps to recognizes that offenders harm the victims, their communities, and even themselves. Also, it involves more people, other than the principles, in responding to the crime rather than giving key roles only to government and the offender, it includes victims, families and communities as well. Finally, it measures the success of the process differently, rather than measuring how much punishment is inflicted, it measures how much harm is repaired or prevented. Restorative justice benefited Mildred, David and the community well. This process helped by providing the people involved with a sense of closure. The victim and perpetrator are both able to move forward with their lives and not let the stigma of the crime fester within them. They are able to move forward, and in some cases help other people in the same situation move forward. For the most part they are the people that are most directly affected by this process, and have the most to lose or gain from the agreement to proceed with this type of justice. The community benefits from restorative justice because it brings the idea that people are remorseful for their misguided actions. The crime was committed in......

Words: 742 - Pages: 3

Punishment

...Punishment The one word that comes to my mind after reading George Orwell's “ A Hanging,” is punishment. His weak argument against capital punishment if full of common fallacies. His clever use of descriptive words and phrases appeal to the readers emotions without ever giving us any actual facts of the reason for the hanging. When he describes the prisoner as “ a Hindu, a puny wimp of a man, rather like a comic man on films,” this is an attempt to give the prisoner a more likeable personality without actually giving any evidence or validity to his claim, an obvious Red Herring. His argument is very subtle and very cleverly written, but has no actual facts to back up his anti capital punishment theme. Capital punishment is at the forefront of the news in Oklahoma this week. There are currently two convicted murderers awaiting execution on death row in the state. The controversy that has arisen is the lack of one of the drugs commonly used in lethal injections. The drug Propofol is manufactured in Europe. The European Union is against capital punishment and is refusing to sell the drug for this purpose. This has caused some states to use a different combination of drugs for the injection. There are two prisoners in Oklahoma awaiting execution by lethal injection this month and the state does not have the drug Propafol and could be forced to use a different combination of drugs. The attorneys for murderers Lockett and Warner argue that this is inhumane. They cite a......

Words: 457 - Pages: 2

Punishment

...Punishment is the authoritative imposition of an undesirable or unpleasant outcome upon an individual or group by law enforcement, in response to behaviour that an authority deems unacceptable or a violation of some norm.[1][2][3][4][5] The unpleasant imposition may include a fine, penalty, or confinement, or be the removal or denial of something pleasant or desirable. The individual may be a person, or even an animal. The authority may be either a group or a single person, and punishment may be carried out formally under a system of law or informally in other kinds of social settings such as within a family.[2] Negative consequences that are not authorised or that are administered without a breach of rules are not considered to be punishment as defined here.[4] The study and practice of the punishment of crimes, particularly as it applies to imprisonment, is called penology, or, often in modern texts, corrections; in this context, the punishment process is euphemistically called "correctional process".[6] Research into punishment often includes similar research into prevention. Fundamental justifications or alternatives to punishment include: retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, andincapacitations. The last could include such measures as isolation, in order to prevent the wrongdoer's having contact with potential victims, or the removal of a hand in order to make theft more difficult.[7] Of the four justifications, only retribution is part of the definition of......

Words: 459 - Pages: 2

Punishment

...For this paper I was challenged to answer the question, does punishment deter crime? Personally I think this is a tough question to answer, and even more so to answer correctly. For me, I think that no punishment would ever solve anything, and if anything it would make the person that you are punishing even angrier that they are getting punished and would probably want to keep on doing what ever they were doing wrong. This does not mean that I am right though, so over the past week I have been documenting and researching the four types of punishment, retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, social protection, and trying to find the best results I could find that would make logical sense, and this is what I came up with. First I will start with retribution. The chapter defines retribution as an act of moral vengeance in which the society makes the person committing the crime suffers as much as the suffering caused by the crime that was committed. At first glance I thought that this was a good idea, and I think that it would be very useful, and I still do. I can recall a saying that one of my grandfather’s uses to say, and that was “an eye for an eye.” I never quite knew what this meant until much later in life, but I think that this is a good idea to go with. Still, in the research that I have conducted, all of the studies stated that this did not work in making the criminal any better of a person, or someone who would not go out and commit the same crime for a second...

Words: 1396 - Pages: 6

Ethics Case: Profiting from Death: “Janitor’s Insurance”

...FIN3403 Ethics Case: Profiting From Death: “Janitor’s Insurance” (1)The definition of unethical is “not morally correct”. If just going off of that definition alone and not doing any research, I would say yes, that COLI is unethical from reading the case involving employers taking out COLI policies for their employees. After doing research on other examples of unethical business practices, I found some very serious cases, such as Toyota’s example where the company was ignored safety concerns to save money. This caused hundreds of rollover accidents and caused deaths as well. This is clear as day example of an unethical business practice. Now for this case, I believe an employer being able to take out Company Owned Life Insurance (COLI) policies out for their employees is not unethical. As long as the employees are given life insurance as an option under their benefits package, then I don’t see a problem with it one bit. In the case “Profiting from Death: “Janitor’s Insurance””, there is one example that I do believe is unethical. The Stillwagoner family asked the owner of the company where their diseased family member worked, if the company provided life insurance. The owner stated that it did not. A couple of months later, the Stillwagoner family learned that the company had a $200,000 life insurance policy out on their loved one. Lying in general is wrong, but when it involves someone’s death and a family trying to......

Words: 934 - Pages: 4

Punishment

...Punishment and Sentencing Philosophies Punishment and Sentencing Philosophies Chandra Walker Axia Online-UOP Abstract In this paper we will discuss the various punishment and sentencing philosophies that are used within the criminal justice system. The process that is used to apply justice is determined for the most part by punishment philosophies. These philosophies are used to express a variety of different concerns and arguments regarding the use of appropriate sentencing and treatment. Rehabilitation is a philosophy that predominantly rues the juvenile justice court system, but do not carry as much weight and is widely scrutinized within the adult courts sector. Rehabilitation may be scrutinized in the juvenile justice court system when the criminal behavior of the juvenile continues to escalate, but when rehabilitation is successful then it can be both beneficial for the criminal and society. When the appeals process is exercised it provides the fair practice of law, ensures those at trial the rights of due process, and gives clarity and provides full understanding of justice and the law. Punishment and Sentencing Philosophies In any nation that strives for great democracy, the major concern is the guaranteed universality of justice. For the US this is an ongoing process that is pursued largely in the court systems on an ongoing basis. Many criminalists state that if it the general basis for an action to constitute a crime really...

Words: 1461 - Pages: 6

Punishment

...Punishment A Discussion Paper Submitted to Chase Porter In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for PSC 205 University of Alabama By Anna Yslava November 17, 2015 Discuss Nietzsche’s explanation for how we derive punishment and what role it serves. Do you agree or disagree with its analysis. We are generally tempted to see things as having inherent meanings. For instance, punishment is at once the act of punishing and the reason behind the punishment. However, Nietzsche argues, these things have had different meanings at different times. For instance, the act of punishment has been at times a celebration of one's power, at times an act of cruelty, at times a simple tit-for-tat. We cannot understand a thing, and we certainly cannot understand its origin, if we assume that it has always held the same meaning. Punishment was not meted out on the basis of guilt, but simply as a reprisal. The concept of punishment, for instance, has an aspect that is enduring and an aspect that is fluid. Contrary to what we might otherwise assume, Nietzsche suggests that the act of punishing is what endures, and the purpose for which we punish is what is fluid. Punishment has such a long history that it's no longer clear exactly why we punish. Nietzsche provides a long list of different "meanings" that punishment has had over the ages. In this list, Nietzsche nowhere mentions the development of "bad conscience," and suggests that even today, punishment does not awaken a......

Words: 614 - Pages: 3

Punishments

...Week Five: Punishments By: Kevin Hubbard University Of Phoenix CJS/230 Instructor: Ray Bynum October 23,2011 What is the Objective of punishment in the criminal justice system? I think it depends on the nature of the crime. The harsher the crime the more they should serve. Today in society I show that we have many innocent victims that are behind prison walls, does this make it right, NO, shall something be done, yes, but the question remains what? I do like the fact that they rehabilitate the inmates and help them to establish some type of trade to allow them to be accepted back into community because without this form of rehab it will slim the chance for them being accepted back into our society! The criminal can give back to society in some form whether it be their time, for some an apology, but let it be something given back even if it’s just hard labor. This will show that the inmates maybe of sorrow for the crime they commit. How does Punishment apply to the overall criminal justice system? The first contact an offender has with the criminal justice system is usually with the police (or law enforcement) who investigate a suspected wrong-doing and make an arrest, but if the suspect is dangerous to the whole nation, the FBI is called in. When warranted, law enforcement agencies or police officers are empowered to use force and other forms of legal coercion and means to effect public and social order. The term is most commonly associated with......

Words: 367 - Pages: 2

An Argumentative Analysis of: Profiting from a Child’s Illiteracy

...An Argumentative Analysis of: Profiting From a Child’s Illiteracy By: Kristof Nicholas Christopher Corder Baker College of Muskegon Profiting From a Child’s Illiteracy Supplemental Security Income (S.S.I.) benefits for minors is a national governmentally funded program for disabled children. S.S.I is for helping the families of children with disabilities. It helps manage the stresses of financial burdens that come with children who have special needs. Nicholas Kristof states that “America’s safety net can sometimes entangle people in a soul-crushing dependency.” (Kristof, 2012) Nicholas Kristof believes that people become dependent on S.S.I and enable their children to become illiterate in order to maintain the use of S.S.I. Kristof’s title and initial arguments lead you to believe he will thoroughly examine this claim. However, he provides insufficient evidence and makes assumptions that are inaccurate and unfair to the families who are receiving S.S.I. Furthermore, he weakens his argument by introducing other thesis statements later in his paper. This distracts from and sometimes contradicts his initial thesis. Kristof begins with an interesting and potentially important statement that dependence on S.S.I. inadvertently perpetuates illiteracy, but he doesn’t ground his argument with clear evidence or maintain his focus. Kristof states that poor parents in the Appalachian hills purposely pull children out of literacy program to increase their chances of qualifying......

Words: 1696 - Pages: 7

Punishment

...How would you define punishment? How do the variations of punishment affect convicted criminals? What recommendations would you suggest regarding sentencing to help reduce recidivism rates? Punishment is a penalty for wrongdoing. Punishment can come in many forms including a verbal warning, probation, monetary fines, or incarceration. The type of punishment in the criminal justice system depends on the crime committed as well as the background of the offender. Convicted criminals may be less likely to commit the same offenses based on the punishments they are facing. If a criminal is facing life in prison, they may make the extra effort to avoid criminal activity. A criminal who is incarcerated and still participates in illegal activities faces further punishments that are meant to shock the inmate into following the rules. Additional time added to the criminal’s sentence, segregation, and loss of privileges are all possible outcomes a criminal faces for committing violations while incarcerated. In order to reduce recidivism rates prison systems could begin programs that slowly introduce inmates back into a society like setting as the end of their sentence draws closer. When a criminal goes to jail they undergo changes to adapt to the prison system in order to survive. They get used to the rules of the prison system and become accustomed to the structure of when to eat, where to go, and how their day to day life functions. Once their sentence is finished they are......

Words: 313 - Pages: 2

Punishment

...is continued there will be consequences or punishment. Punishment is used to keep control or order so that everyone, no matter the circumstance will be protected. Punishment is divided up into four types: retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and societal protection. Since every crime or wrong doing is not created equal and almost every person reacts to the different types of punishment differently, the four types of punishment can be distributed according to the person and the crime. Retribution is the oldest form of punishment used. Retribution is described as an act of formal vengeance by which society makes the offender suffers as much as the suffering caused by the crime. For example: if a person kills another person, the dead person’s family suffers a greatly. Therefore, the murderer is most likely to punish by death as well. This form of punishment, in my opinion, is contradictive. If the crime one person commits is wrong, doing the same to that person is also wrong. This form of punishment does not help any of the persons involved, nor does it teach those who experience the crime through the media or hear say a lesson. Retribution is confuses all that it encounters and only make matter worst. Deterrence is defined as the attempt to discourage criminality through the use of punishment. Deterrence is another form of punishment used to persuade people to not engage in criminal activities or wrong doings. This form of punishment brings attention to all types of......

Words: 1115 - Pages: 5

Punishment

...the world as long as human beings have walked on it. When there is a crime there must be a form of punishment. A form of punishment must exist when a person commits a crime, he or she must be taught a lesson to prevent the crime from occurring again. To understand how punishment was developed a person must start from the beginning. This essay will discuss the history of punishment, the history of prison development, the comparison of the Pennsylvania system and the Auburn system, and last the impact and involvement of prison labor over time. Before discussing the history of punishment one must know what the” term” punishment means. The “term” punishment can be in numerous ways but each “term” possesses the same meaning. One way of defining punishment is, a penalty inflicted on an offender through judicial procedure (Merriam-Webster, 2012). The use of punishment can be dated back to as early as the 1600s. During that era crime in America was punished based on the English criminal codes (Sieter, 2011). Examples of crimes in the 1600s would be drunkenness, stealing something of minor value, and slander (the utterance of false charges or misrepresentations, which defame and damage another's reputation (Merriam-Webster, 2012)). If a person was found committing any of the crimes previously listed he or she would be known as an offender. An offender would receive his or her punishment at the town whipping post or placed in stocks and pillories. Pillories are said to have been......

Words: 1067 - Pages: 5

Punishment

...History of Punishment According to (Seiter, 2011) Cesare Beccaria is known as the founder of the classical school of criminology, the first organized theory of crime causation linked to appropriate punishments. According to (Seiter, 2011) Beccaria suggested that the purpose of punishment is utility or the prevention of crime. According to (Seiter, 2011) Jeremy Bentham is the creator of the hedonistic calculus suggesting that punishments outweigh the pleasure criminals get from committing crime. According to (Seiter, 2011) another way to remove offenders from society was through transportation or deportation. Transportation started in England and was used throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to send undesirables to the colonies in America. According to (Seiter, 2011) the first response to crime in the American colonies was based on the English criminal codes and incorporated the Puritans linking of crime with sin in developing a rigid and strict system of punishments. Violations of expected community behavior were death with severely using corporal and capital punishment carried out in public to deter both individual offenders and the broader community. According to (Seiter, 2011) whipping at the town center whipping post or placement in stocks and pillories was common punishment for minor offenses such as drunkenness, slander, or stealing something of minor value. Pillories were wooden frames with holes for offender’s hands and head. According to (Seiter,......

Words: 838 - Pages: 4