Mcgregor's Theory Y

In: Business and Management

Submitted By talicat21
Words 657
Pages 3
Discussion Questions: Chapter 1:

1) What role, if any, does McGregor’s Theory Y play at Whole Foods? Explain.

By definition, Theory Y adopts the notion of happy employees, whom are creative, self motivated, and relish operating with grander responsibilities than the norm. Which is why I would consider the role of Whole Foods to fall in the second theory of McGregor’s theory Y. Mainly due in part to what Mackey said himself, “I Think business enterprises are like any other communities. They can aspire to the highest values that have inspired humans throughout time. You can use different value models.” Meaning, employees take responsibility, are self motivated, can operate with little to know direction, and view the notion of work as a natural part of life, and have the ability to creatively solve problems.

2) How does Whole Foods build human and social capital?

According to Mackey, it is stated that he understood the hiring process, and how quintessential it is for a company to ensure they are hiring the right people for the job. It has been proven many times over, how by hiring suitable employees, the level of enjoyment in their job performance goes up, and thus their view of where they stand with the company equally rises as well. Hence, why they would prove to be an outstanding investment to the company. Furthermore, by ensuring a comfortable work environment for all, the social aspect comes natural.

3) How does this case bring the profile of the 21st Century manager (Table1-3) to life? Explain.

As Mackey states, it’s apparent in the 21st Century most managers have adopted the style of the win win solution. Meaning, if the company’s managers view their fellow employees as equals rather than as inferiors, as well as always being there to show their support, the work environment for all brightens up, making it enjoyable for everyone.…...

Similar Documents

Theory X Y Z

...Braden Division of Business & Economics Lecture: Theory Z Participative Management Styles: Theory Z - William Ouchi During the 1970s, when Japanese-style management was all the rage, William Ouchi, took the Theory X, Theory Y concept one step further: Theory Z. This is the participative model. Ouchi was born and educated in America, but was of Japanese descent. He visited Japan and studied their success with team and participative management and developed this theory. Assumptions about: Workers' motivation. Theory X The Theory X manager assumes that the only motivation that works for employees is $$money$$. Theory Y The Theory Y manager assumes that employees are motivated by their needs to fulfill their social, esteem, selfactualization, and security. The Theory Y manager believes that employees see work as a natural activity and will seek out opportunities to have increased responsibility and understanding of their tasks. The Theory Y manager believes that workers will respond best to favorable working conditions that do not pose threats or strong control. Theory Z The Theory Z manager assumes that employees are motivated by a strong sense of commitment to be a part of something worthwhile -- the self-actualization need. The Theory Z manager believes that employees will not only seek out opportunities for responsibility, in fact, they crave opportunities to advance and learn more about the company. The Theory Z manager believes that employees should learn......

Words: 489 - Pages: 2

Theory X and Y

...former supervisor used when dealing with his employees. You know that this is sometimes referred to as a theory X approach, and you know that a more participative management approach is called theory Y. However, you have not taken the management course that covers these topics. Using the library and Internet resources, you are to write a 500–750-word research paper that compares theory X to theory Y in terms of management styles. Specifically, you are to include the following requirements: Explain each theory. Create a chart that shows the pros and cons of each management style. Is one particular style best in all situations? Why, or why not? Give an example. Give your opinion on the difference between theory Y management and what might be considered to be democratic decision making. Why would a manager's understanding of these two theories be important to good leadership practices? Theory X and Y In 1960, Douglas McGregor acknowledged that theories in his book, The Human Side of Enterprise, which questioned human behavior. These two theories are called Theory X and Theory Y. These two theories vary from each other in many ways and discuss how managers see their employees and whether the managers help their employees thrive or assume they are only working for security. Theory X assumes that employees are lazy and need directions in order to keep working. It also states......

Words: 901 - Pages: 4

Theory X and Y

...Theory X and Theory Y were ideas created by management professor, Douglas McGregor. These theories were originally introduced in 1960 in his book “The Human Side of Enterprise” and describe two very different management styles. Theory X is described as an “authoritarian” style which emphasizes productivity and performance. Theory X managers assume that people have a natural tendency to avoid working and that managers must counteract this laziness by micromanaging. They constantly need to be controlled to get anything done. It implies that people prefer to be directed, do not want responsibility, and have little or no ambition. McGregor states that Theory X merely satisfies human’s lower-level physical needs and could not hope to be very productive in the long run because people are not working, thinking nor are they motivated by their own passion. (Theories X and Y, 2006) Theory Y is quite the opposite. It is described as a “participative” style of management which emphasis self direction and self control. Theory Y suggests that people choose to go to work and naturally want to perform well. They are committed to the task at hand and will accomplish it without badgering from management. It says that people have a need for self achievement and reach this by working. Creativity, ingenuity, and imagination are widely distributed among the population. People are capable of using these abilities to solve an organizational problem. (Theory X and Theory Y, 1995) McGregor......

Words: 294 - Pages: 2

Mcgregor's Leadership Model

...McGregor’s Leadership Model In the modern business world, leadership is an essential key to long-term business success. One professional who has developed a theory associated with leadership is Douglas McGregor. This theory suggests that two types of leadership exist. These types are called X leadership and Y leadership. Differing academics have researched the X and Y leadership views and determined various levels of validity associated with this theory. To determine the value of this theory, the research and example-based use of this theory presented by others must be reviewed. Similarly, company leaders must review the history of leadership practices and develop methods that have the highest potential for success in the environment associated company-specific operational activities. Douglas McGregor developed his theory of X and Y leadership in the 1960s at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He believed companies can achieve quality leadership through basic employee motivation. The X and Y styles of motivation are opposite one another and in direct contrast. The X style of leadership and employee motivation states employees lack motivation and are lazy in nature. Essentially, individual employees lack motivation and must be supervised by leaders on a continual basis because those employees avoid responsibility whenever possible. This close supervision narrows employee versatility and requires extensive time and guidance by specific leaders. To establish employee......

Words: 1250 - Pages: 5

X, Y, Z Theory

...Adventist International Institute of Advanced Studies X,Y,Z Theory By Alexander Leukhin Post session assignment BSAD515 Organizational Behavior Professor: Donald Bankhead 2012 Теории мотивации Мотивация – это побуждение к действию. Технология управления– это способы побуждения к нужным действиям. Существует более пятидесяти различных теорий мотивации. С ними можно подробно познакомиться в интернете. Что-то работает, что-то устарело, что-то сложно для понимания. Наверное, самый древний метод мотивации, и для некоторых руководителей до сих пор единственный, – это “кнута и пряника”. В данной работе мы рассмотрим 3 теории мотивации, которые пытаются дать объяснение поведению человека в разных ситуациях, и направлены на поиск решений, побуждающих к действию. Общие сведения о теориях Х, Y и Z Основным автором теории Х и Y принято считать Дугласа Мак-Грегора. Дуглас Мак-Грегор (1906-1964) остается одним из наиболее уважаемых и часто цитируемых авторов в области человеческих отношений (того, что в 1940-1950-е гг. назвали бихевиоризмом). Его работы вдохновили столь несхожих между собой мыслителей, как Розабет Мосс Кантер, Уоррен Беннис и Роберт Уотерман. Особо стоит отметить, что Мак-Грегор наиболее известен своими мотивационными моделями — теориями X и Y. Мак-Грегор родился в Детройте, в семье священника. В 1932 г. он закончил Городской колледж в Детройте (City College of Detroit), ныне это Государственный университет Уэйна (Wayne University).......

Words: 4801 - Pages: 20

Theory X and Y

...Literature review essay - McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y styles of management The Human Side of Enterprise (1960) introduced Douglas McGregor’s groundbreaking theories of management and social styles in the workplace. Whilst Theory X and Theory Y were initially suggested in the early 60s they are still reflected in many organisations today. Theory X suggests that humans are generally disinterested and unenthused in relation to work and are unable to accomplish self direction and behavior based on initiative (Kopelman, RE, Prottas, DJ & Davis, AL 2008). In stark contrast Theory Y is based around the principals that workers are not fundamentally lazy but are in fact capable of self control and direction in conjunction with the contribution of innovative ideas and creative input within an organisation. Today McGregor’s theories may still be observed in many workplaces, but in the majority of cases, a healthy combination of both is applied, as discussed in further paragraphs, along with the contrast of the theories and the basics of the theories themselves (Fisher, EA 2009). Theory X states that humans have a loathing for general work practices and do not have to ability to act responsibly and in a trustworthy manor. Theory X suggests that a persons reasons for working are based on their economic self interests alone. Managers in this situation rely on rewards to motivate and punishments to discourage undesirable behaviors. Managers are also often looking for mistakes......

Words: 1031 - Pages: 5

Mcgregor's Ltd.

...| McGregor’s Ltd. | Memo To: | James McGregor | From: | Allen Lee | cc: | | Date: | October 29, 2014 | Re: | Employee Discount | | | Mr. McGregor, I would like to talk with you regarding the pending change to our employee discount system. I agree with you that changes need to be made within the company, to save money and create revenue, but I don’t think taking discounts away from some of our long time employees is the best way to obtain those goals. I have set forth a plan that will insure more equality of discounts, including some employees that currently receive no discount at all, and in the long run, we will still save money without damaging the morale of our workforce. In my plan, we would adopt an employee discount based on the three-tier system you proposed. A 10%, 15% and 20% based on the each goods profit margin. The only difference is if the new plan isn’t beneficial to an employee, they would be grandfathered in and keep their current plan. All employees will be eligible to receive the discounts. This includes the cleaning staff who currently receives no discount. This new discount will also serve to attract a younger group of employees as you have stressed, as well as increase morale amongst our current employees. New employees will receive the revised employee discount. As employees leave the company, discounts grandfathered in, will become obsolete, thus saving us money in the long run. This will also prevent any adverse......

Words: 374 - Pages: 2

Theory Xand Theor Y

...Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y Douglas McGregor’s landmark book, The Human Side of Enterprise (1960), changed the path of management thinking and practice (Kopelman, Prottas, & Davis, 2008, p. 255). Douglas had his own beliefs and theories about human beings and why they do certain things or act certain ways. He ended up proposing two different views of humans and they were titled Theory X and Theory Y. Theory X is the assumption that employees dislike work, are lazy, dislike responsibility, and must be coerced to perform (Robbins & Judge, 2013, p. 205). Theory Y is the assumption that employees like work, are creative, seek responsibility, and can exercise self-direction (Robbins & Judge, 2013, p. 205). McGregor believed that one of his theory’s was more valid and made more sense that the other one. There was never any evidence that confirmed or denied that either set of assumptions are valid or will lead to more motivational workers (Robbins & Judge, 2013). The writer will discuss not only what each theory is, but also if they are applicable for current day employees. How these theories benefit criminal justice personnel and organizations will be discussed also. Theory X First let’s begin with exploring Theory X. Under this Theory X, managers believe employees inherently dislike work and must therefore be directed or even coerced into performing it (Robbins & Judge, 2013, p. 205). It was believed that theory was less valid than the other. Theory X......

Words: 498 - Pages: 2

Theory X & Theory Y

...Theory X and Theory Y: “In establishing the capability-building agenda, top management provides employees with a clear view of the next advantage to be constructed. Challenges are the milestones on the path between today and tomorrow; they are the operational means of staging the acquisition of new competitive advantages. Corporate challenges are the operational means of staging the acquisition of new competitive advantages. Challenges are the means for allocating emotional and intellectual energy, energy that flows from enthusiasm for the firm’s strategic intent. We believe that the task of focusing intellectual and emotional energy is as important for top management as allocating financial responsibilities—unless every employee feels a deep sense of responsibility for success, and has a clear channel for contribution, global leadership, will remain elusive.” (Hamel and Prachald, 1994). Thus, we must manage our businesses so employees—advise from management—must have a clear channel for how they can contribute. To this end, is there a venue that exists that will give the worker on the assembly line the same sense of direction as the CEO? We will first test a remedy proposed in the 1960’s by published management theory mentor Douglas McGregor. McGregor’s perspective was that management was more that simply giving orders and coercing obedience; it was a careful balancing of organizational needs with those of the individual. He defined these individual needs......

Words: 1121 - Pages: 5

Theory Y and Whole Foods

...that the way employers’ treat and value their employees would determine their actions and values, and drive how they performed on the job (Chertis & Mujtaba, 2014). Theory X was an outdated, pessimistic view and viewed all workers in a negative way. Theory Y, on the other hand, was a more modern, positive assumption. McGregor believed that a manager could accomplish more through others by viewing them as self-energized, committed, responsible and creative beings (Kreitner & Kinicki, p. 9). McGregor’s Theory Y plays a role in the way that John Mackey, co-founder and co-CEO of Whole Food Markets runs his business. McGregor theorized that people would become committed to organizational objectives if they were rewarded for doing so. Mackey believes similarly. He believes that it is the manager’s job to seek out and hire the most appropriate person for the job. He believes that if you train them well that they will be happy in the workplace and will provide better customer service as a result. He believes that happy employees make for happy customers and happy customers make referrals to other people, which make happy investors (Kreitner & Kinicki, p. 30). Mackey didn’t emulate McGregor’s Theory Y completely. He came up with his own philosophy and called it conscious capitalism (Chertis & Muitaba, 2014). His theory is based on purpose rather than profit (Sacks, 2009). Mackey believes it is important to factor in the needs of all that are involved with the business:......

Words: 520 - Pages: 3

Management Theory

...Running Head: MANAGEMENT THEORY 1 Management Theory Management Theory: Great Leaders of made of Machiavelli, Nietzsche, and McGregor Tyng Wu Benedictine University Humanities 250 Professor Amy Hanridge June 1, 2014 Management Theory: Great Leaders of made of Machiavelli, Nietzsche, and McGregor Theories of leadership in any period are driven by a set of principles and hopes on the part of the philosopher. A core assumption about leadership is that leaders who succeed have a “vision,” a tangible goal toward which they and their followers can strive towards. While this is true on one spectrum, there are others that believe in the philosophy of Lao Tzu who said, “A good traveler has no fixed plans and is not intent on arriving” (Tzu, 2014). Participative management and leadership style of the modern times was influenced by the philosophers of the past. In modern leadership and management we see Machiavelli’s active rule, not by fortune, but by virtue and prudence. We also see Nietzsche’s will to power, which is more internally driven first and foremost, but the internal becomes outward actions. Finally we see McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y in management styles, with micromanagers or enlightened leaders. McGregor’s Theory X and Machiavelli viewed human beings in a negative light, where they must be controlled by any possible means. However, McGregor’s Theory Y falls more in line with Nietzsche’s philosophy of the will to power, where......

Words: 1578 - Pages: 7

Mcgregor’s Theory Y

...QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION 1. What role, if any, does McGregor’s Theory Y play at Whole Foods? Explain. El rol esencial que debe realizar es saber cómo satisfacer al cliente mediante su equipo de empleados para de esa manera atenderlos de una manera tratable. 2. How does Whole Foods build human and social capital? De la manera que da incentivos a fomentar una mejor propuesta para buscar el cambio a través del desempeño laboral. Y respecto al capital social se tiene visiones y logros compartidos. 3. How does this case bring the profile of the 21 st-century manager (table 1-3) to life? Explain. En la actualidad en que vivimos, el jefe del siglo 21 ya no es una persona controlador o dominante como era antes, se puede decir que ahora el jefe estimula la participación de su trabajador como haciéndole reconocimientos por su buen rendimiento laboral. 4. Where would you locate Whole foods on Carroll’s global corporate social responsibility pyramid in Figure 1-3? Explain Un ejemplo de responsabilidad filantrópica es Wong, el grupo Cencosud, el cual aplica este tipo de responsabilidad con sus empleados, ellos generan más ganancias que pérdidas gracias a que aplican lo mismo que Mackey. 5. Which of the seven moral principles in table 1-4 appear to be in force at Whole foods? Explain. El cuarto principio moral es el más indicado donde dice: Lealtad: Promesas, contratos y compromisos deben ser honrados. La lealtad incluye la......

Words: 540 - Pages: 3

Managerial Economics - Explain Mc-Gregor’s Theory X & Theory Y

...individual comes to know about “values”? 4. What is difference between terminal and instrumental values? 5. What is the importance of emotional intelligence? Section – B (Marks – 25) Attempt all questions – 1. Why managers require knowledge of OB? 2. What are the contributing disciplines of Organizational Behavior? 3. What do you mean by Locus of Control? 4. What is the influence of heredity and environment on personality? 5. How does Personality Typing help in the world of work? Section – C (Marks – 50) Attempt any five questions – 1. Define organizational behaviour & its importance. Discuss how other science contributes to the study of organizational behavior. 2. Explain Mc-Gregor’s theory X & theory Y? 3. What is personality- What are its determinates - Which of them, you feel, are more important in shaping personality. 4. What is stress- Explain various levels of stressors. List of the stress coping strategies at various levels. Who should be responsible for dealing with the stress – individual or the group? 5. Explain the nature of group and various types of group. Why it is important for mangers to be familiar with the concepts of group 6. What is a team- What are its types. Would you like to work in a self or Managed team- Explain. 7. Explain the styles of leadership. Explain the traits of effective leader. Need Answer Sheet of this Question paper,......

Words: 1096 - Pages: 5

Theories X and Y

...Theories X and Y According to The Economist (2008b), Theories X and Y were contrived by Douglas McGregor, who published them in his 1960 book “The Human Side of Enterprise”. He was heavily influenced by Abraham Maslow, and this was particularly evident in his theories that contrasted greatly with the prevalence of scientific management at the time (The Economist, 2008a). Theories X and Y identified a principle divergence between management approaches and this formed the foundation for the development of modern management theory. (The Economist, 2008b) Theory X emphasises “productivity, on the concept of a fair day’s work, on the evils of feather bedding and restriction of output, on rewards for performance … [it] reflects an underlying belief that management must counteract an inherent human tendency to avoid work” (McGregor, 1960). It makes the assumption that individuals naturally require motivation and coercion to maximise their output. Theory Y, however, “assumes that people will exercise self-direction and self-control in the achievement of organisational objectives to the degree that they are committed to those objectives” (McGregor, 1960). It asserts that individuals possess a natural inclination to placate their desire for self-fulfilment through work. Google Inc. is an acclaimed example of Theory Y’s successful implementation. It gives stock options to 99% of its employees, effectuates the provision of workplace benefits (e.g. Day care, maternal/paternal leave......

Words: 464 - Pages: 2

Theory X, Y, Z

...301-01 6.6.12 Theory X, Y, and Z Achieving a clear understanding of human nature is an important aspect of management in the work place. In order for managers and workers to work together as an effective and productive unit, the workers must know how they fit into the overall scheme of things, and the managers must have a clear understanding of how they can maximize productivity by supporting their employees through the appropriate leadership style. These theories explain various aspects of the relationship that exits between management and workers in areas such as motivation, leadership, power, and conflict in order to maximize productivity. Theory X This theory holds the belief that people do not like work and that some kind of direct pressure and control must be exerted to get them to work effectively. These people require a rigidly managed environment, usually requiring threats of disciplinary action as a primary source of motivation. It is also held that employees will only respond to monetary rewards as an incentive to perform above the level of that which is expected. Theory Y This theory assumes that people are creative and eager to work. Workers tend to desire more responsibility than Theory X workers, and have strong desires to participate in the decision making process. Theory Y workers are comfortable in a working environment which allows creativity and the opportunity to become personally involved in organizational planning. Theory Z This theory deals......

Words: 496 - Pages: 2