Law Common Assesment Analysis

In: Business and Management

Submitted By RababKaz
Words 2331
Pages 10
COMMON ASSESMENT: CASE ANALYSIS
Submission 21st February 2001

Present an in-depth comparative analysis of two firms operating in two different countries. In the case analysis compare and contrast the differences in political, ethical, economic and legal differences and their impact on management decision making.

Introduction:
The aim of this paper is to identify the key political, ethical and economic differences between Apple, based in the USA and Shell, based in Holland, and then compare the differences based on management the individual decision making processes in the subject countries. The ethical conditions will also be discussed, with regard to laws on corporate social responsibility of the companies, as well as the environmental laws of the countries and the impact on the companies.
Shell Holland
Royal Dutch Shell plc, also known as shell, is a global group of energy and Petrochemicals Company with more than 100,000 employees in almost 90 countries. Shell is a worldwide oil and gas company, which is headquartered in the Netherlands and with its registered office in the United Kingdom. It is the largest energy company and the second-largest company in the world measured by revenues, It is management controlled and is active in every area of the oil and gas industry, that includes exploration and production, refining, distribution and marketing, power generation and trading. It also has major renewable energy activities, hydrogen, solar and wind power.
The Royal Dutch Shell Group “RDSG” is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies, the subject company plays a key role in helping meet the world’s growing demand for energy in economically, environmentally and socially responsible ways.

The subject company gives focus on the delivery and growth and expanding in early 2008, Shell said that in the investing in new…...

Similar Documents

Common Law

...Contents 1a. Explain the different types of business agreement and the importance of the key elements required for the formation of a valid contract 9 1b. Analyse the scenario from the perspective of the law of contract. Apply the rules of offer and acceptance in a given scenario, also considering any impact of new technology 11 1c. Assess the importance of the rules of intention and consideration of the parties to the agreement 12 1d. Explain the importance of the contracting parties having the appropriate legal capacity to enter into a binding agreement 14 2a. Analyse specific contract terms with reference to their importance and impact if these terms are broken 16 2b. Apply and analyze the law on standard form contracts 17 References 19 1a. Explain the different types of business agreement and the importance of the key elements required for the formation of a valid contract To implement the business activities with others, an person and even an organization needs make the legal contracts. The contract is considered as a versatile legal tool which guarantees legal enforcement of its terms. There are four popular types of business agreements such as sales agreements, employment agreements, independent contractor agreements and confidentiality agreements (1). * Sales agreements: this is a type of business contract between merchants and consumers. It is considered as a binding contract which binds the related parties if they sign the contract. The......

Words: 3964 - Pages: 16

Common Law

...4.1 Apply the elements of the tort of negligence and defences in different business situations Tort is described as an action which causes harm to a person. It is also a law that protects an individual from any harm that may be caused by the unreasonable actions of another. Tort of negligence is considered the unintentional tort. Negligent torts are actions that violated the standard duty of care that caused an unexpected or unintended injury to a person. In negligent tort claims, there are four elements that must be proven by the claimant: a duty to care, the breach of duty, consequential harm, and legal causation or remoteness. * Duty to care: Everyone has a legal duty of care to all. This means that a person shouldn’t do anything reckless that may result to the harm of another. For example, a doctor has a duty to care for his patients by giving them the right treatment and prescribing the appropriate and safe medication. Duty of care in Donaghue -v- Stevenson 1932 was defined as exercising such care as is due in such 'acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure persons so directly affected that you ought reasonably to have them in contemplation' and Caparo Industries -v- Dickman 1990 referred also to situations in which it would be fair, just, and reasonable to impose. * Breach of duty: The breach of duty happens when a person fails to exercise a reasonable standard of care to another. He may have intentionally or......

Words: 874 - Pages: 4

Common Law

...Common Law Common law is a system of law, which is developed by the judges through the decision of courts, which is generally seen as being opposed to the civil system, which consists of statues, which is adopted by the legislative process, which in turn is developed by the executive branch. Precedent or case law therefore constitutes the system of law. Some of the rules constituting common law that was not adequate to ensure justice as common law itself is not adequate are the damages, mistake, and undue influence which are sorted below as example: • Damages- While building a house, the contractor and the owner had a contract of making a building, which contained 20 windows, but the contractor ended up making only 18 windows. As the windows were not made as per the contract, the contractor need to either make the window as told or needs to pay certain amount as compensation to the owner so that the owner can ask other to do the work for which he needs to pay. So it is a damage that is faced by the owner and compensated by the contractor. • Mistake - as per given example in damages while building a house a contract is made as per building of the house with certain amount of money. So, as the owner of the house needs to pay money to the contractor as it was contacted before Rs.200000. so while paying the contactor by cash receipt, the owner signed the receipt only of RS.20000 without checking the amount signed the owner paid the contractor as well as the contractor didn’t......

Words: 394 - Pages: 2

Common Law

...Head: INTENT AND THE CODE 1 Different Intents and the Model Penal Code Difference From Common Law INTENT AND THE CODE 2 Abstract Although there are definitions established within Criminal Culpability, mainly intent, there continues to be discussion over the intended meanings. Specific intent, general intent, transferred intent and strict liability are frequently referenced in the determination of criminal offenses but continue to provide a level of confusion to the law professionals. The intent determines the mindset of the person accused of the crime and provides guidance to the process in which they are punished. These intents are part of the mens rea for the crimes committed and differ from the Model Penal Code. The Model Penal Code has served to simplify the definitions used in the previously mentioned intents. INTENT AND THE CODE 3 There are many differences in the interpretations of Common Law intents and liability. These intents are identified as: specific, general, transferred and strict liability which governs decisions of lawmakers and judges. The complexity in understanding the defined intents and applying them uniformly creates a feeling of disproportionate accountability from members of the public. The Model Penal Code (MPC) changes these intents in common law to four mental states: purposely, knowingly, recklessly and negligently. The “MPC expressly rejects......

Words: 972 - Pages: 4

Common Law

...1.2.1 Common law The term common law gives rise to diffi culty as it has several meanings, so any meaning depends upon the context in which the term is used: Common law may mean the law created by the common law courts in contrast to the law created by the Court of Chancery, which was called equity. Common law may m • ean all the law created by the courts, including the law of equity, as opposed to the law created by Parliament, that is legislation. In this sense, common law may be also termed ‘judge- made’ law. • Common law may refer to a legal tradition which defi nes the English legal system and other derivative legal systems as opposed to the civilian legal tradition exemplifi ed by the systems of mainland Europe. Apart from England and Wales other examples of a common law tradition are to be found in the legal systems of the states of the United States (with the exception of Louisiana), Canada, and Australia. Common law in this sense refers to forms of law- making, particularly judge- made law, which is governed by the doctrine of judicial precedent. The characteristic feature of the civilian systems is that law is to be found in codes made by the legislature. The civilian tradition is seen in the legal systems of France and Germany. While the French law of contract is codifi ed and to be found in legislative form, the English law of contract is to be found mainly in the decisions of judges as reported in 7 Common law and equity the law reports. As......

Words: 1698 - Pages: 7

Common Law

...Learning Materials COMMON LAW Common Law, Statute and Precedence are the sources for all laws accepted in the jurisdictions within the United States. Common law is based on the old English Legal System of laws based on the overthrow of monarchial dictators and the replacement with a representative system of Parliament. When the American Colonies established their independence in the late 1700’s they adopted much of the English legal system that they knew when they immigrated to the “New World”. This became the initial basis for civil and criminal law in the newly formed United States. Common law results from judicial decisions handed down from the courts. Most of the common law in criminal issues pertaining to the modern criminal justice system has been subjugated by state and federal legislatures that have created statutes establishing criminal law violations. In dealing with Common Law there is a catch-22 type of situation. When a common law is overridden by a statute creation the history of the common law is vacated in terms of how laws are executed. The problem arises when the enforcement method of the new law has common law as its basis. If this is not deemed acceptable by society then another statutory law has to be created. Whenever new laws are enacted there are frequently challenges in court. These challenges depending on the jurisdiction of the law end up going through the system and various courts of appeals. Ultimately they may reach the US Supreme Court where...

Words: 709 - Pages: 3

Common Law

...What is Common Law Common Law is the system of laws originated and developed in England and based on court decisions, on the doctrines implicit in those decisions, and on customs and usages rather than on codified written laws. Common law is the body of law based on judicial decisions and custom, as distinct from statute law, and the law of a state that is of general application, as distinct from regional customs. What are the sources of American Law? American Law is actually a body of many laws emanating from many sources. Sources of law include: Common Law, Case Law, Statutory Law, Administrative Law, Court Rules and Constitutional Law. American law comes from a variety of sources: the Constitution, state constitutions, federal and state statutes, and case law. Understanding this is important because litigants must identify the source of law in their complaint to bring suit in federal court. Equitable remedies refer to specific types of remedies available in court cases that can only be granted by a judge. A judge will grant, or not grant, a given equitable remedy based on the circumstances of a particular case. The term equitable remedy comes from the old English court system where there were two courts: courts of chancery and courts of law. Under this system, people would go to courts of chancery if the law didn't really provide them with relief but they still believed they had been wronged. Equitable remedies were and still are about what is fair and right. ...

Words: 306 - Pages: 2

Common Law

...terms (a) Simple contract A contact is a promise or an agreement that law can be enforces. The law only can be enforced in some different situations. For an example father promise to take his daughter to get an ice cream, but in this case law can’t be enforced that promise as contact. This type of the contact is the most common type of contacts. (b) Contract under seal The contact which doesn’t required consideration in order to be binding but must be sealed, deliver, and show a clear seal of the signer attached. This type o contact must be in writing or printed on the paper. (c) Signature A person name written as a form of identification in authorizing a check or a document or concluding a letter as a proof is known as signature. (d) Unilateral contract Unilateral contracts involve an action undertaken by one person or group alone. In contract law, unilateral contracts allow only one person to make a promise or agreement (lawyers.com). For an example, Rafel have lost his pen drive while he was delivering a lecture in a class room. In the next day Rafel put a notice in the class notices board mention that anyone who returns his missing pen drive will be rewarded with $ 50. (e) Bilateral contract Bilateral contract is an agreement in between two or more person or groups. This is the most common form of contracts, where most of the contracts between business and persons fall in to this category. Some of the most common bilateral contracts includes, ordering a meal at......

Words: 2551 - Pages: 11

Common Law Essay

...Faculty of Business, Economics and Law School of Law Introduction to Business Law Common Law Assignment Semester 2, 2014 Instructions 1. Weighting: The assignment is worth 20% of your final mark in this subject. 2. Due Date: The assignment is due and must be submitted latest by 4:00 pm on Monday, 15 September, 2014. 3. Questions: You must answer all questions. 4. Type: This is a common law problem-solving assignment, and as such, you are not required to discuss any legislation. The IRAC guide to answering problem questions is the format adopted for this assignment. It has been set out for you. You should cite relevant case authorities (cases) to support your answers. 5. Presentation: Your assignment must be typed with double spacing and wide margins. Size 12 font must be used. 6. Referencing: You must reference your work appropriately using footnotes. The Short Guide to Legal Citation available on LMS contains information on footnote citations. No bibliography is required. 7. Word Limit: The word limit is 1,500 words, including footnotes. You must provide the word count on the front page of your assignment. 8. Cover Sheet/Statement of Authorship: Your assignment must be accompanied by a cover sheet available on LMS. You must complete all the details required on the cover sheet including your tutor’s name and seminar time, and your name and student number. You must sign and date the cover sheet. 9. Submission: You must submit both a hard copy and an electronic copy of your......

Words: 1581 - Pages: 7

Common Law

...Common Law Your Name Course Number Due Date Tutors Name Common Law Introduction In order to effectively interact with the legal department and staff, everyone must have some knowledge in respects to various areas of the law and the legal concepts that one will encounter on a day to day basis. Concepts and examples of common law, when it began, how it is used and where it is used as well as the sources will be discussed. The importance of precedent to the judicial decision-making process is also tied in with common law and how it is used when making court decisions and lastly, but just as important, knowing what equitable remedies means and how it is used in court decisions so as the Manager it is important that everyone is prepared to understand and have the ability to interpret the meanings of each concept.  Common law Common Law is also called Anglo American Law or precedent. It emerged in England in the Middle Ages and it did not originally consist of substantive rights but procedural remedies. The English common law was developed from custom judges rather than legislatures in the English and U.S. courts. Common law, are laws based on court decisions in similar cases in the past. Although law and precedent originated in England they are being used in what used to be English colonies including this country.  All other countries use a statutory system which is the theory behind the common law that should be reliable and predictable whereby, without it......

Words: 1739 - Pages: 7

Common Law

...general tortuous liability comparing and contrasting to contractual liability (3a) A tort is a legal wrong, and the principle is the law gives various rights to person, such as right of a person in possession of land to occupy it without interference or invasion by trespassers. When such a right is infringed the wrongdoer is liable in tort. The law of tort is concerned really with a person’s responsibility to others. It applies to both individuals and companies. (Common Law, Introduction to Types of Torts, p. 231) Generally tort refers to private and civil offenses for which law may provide monetary compensation to the aggrieved party as a remedy. In the case of tort, it usually must be shown that the wrong was committed with intention or negligence, however tort of strict liability does not require any such proof. The common legal relief for a tort is monetary compensation. In some cases, such as nuisance to a neighbour an injunction to prevent recurrence of the act may be granted. According to Sir Frederick Pollock, n.d, Law Teacher, every tort is an act or omission which is related in one of the following ways to harm suffered by a determinate person: * It may be an intended act of the agent to cause harm with or without lawful justification or excuse. * It may be an unintended act of person in itself contrary to law, or an omission of specific legal duty. * It can be an act which violate the absolute right and is treated as illegal regardless......

Words: 4214 - Pages: 17

Common Law

...The term "common law" has it's origins in England in the 11th century. Even today in the US, some common law principles from the original English law are applicable while alongside it is the growing body of common law which is being set as a part of stare decisis i.e. the judicial systems decisions and interpretation of statutory law provisions by judges, are becoming a part of the common law. Other judges look to these decisions as a guideline or as a necessary precedent to follow, while making their own decisions. There are both advantages and disadvantages to a legal system based on common law or precedent-based. Advantages: i) Equity: One of the arguments in favor of a common law system is that equity is a characteristic of this system. As the precedents are followed in all cases, all people are treated equally. The same legal principles are applied to all people irrespective of their position or wealth or power, which may be a factor in some countries. So this system of following precedents which already been set previously tends to bring equity and fairness in its wake. ii) Expedient: As these decisions are based on previous judgments, it's more convenient to follow this process through. People know what to expect; there is an element of predictability. The process is easier and more practical as there are no fixed, lengthy rules but real situations that have already been resolved. iii) Efficient: As there is already a basis on which the judgment......

Words: 456 - Pages: 2

Common Law

...1- Define Common law, derived from English law and found in England, the United States, Canada, and other countries once under English influence; Civil or code law, derived from Roman law and found in Germany, Japan, France, and in non-Islamic and non-Marxist countries; Islamic law, derived from the interpretation of the Koran and found in Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and other Islamic states; A commercial legal system in the Marxist-socialist economies of Russia & the republics of the former Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, China, and other Marxist-socialist states whose legal system centered on the economic, political, and social policies of the state. Arbitration A procedure used as an alternative to “litigation” in which parties in a dispute may select a disinterested party as referee to determine the merits of the case & make a judgment that both judges agree to honor. Litigation The process in which a dispute between parties is contested in a formal judicial setting,. Commonly instigated by a law suit asserting one party’s version of the facts. Marxist – socialist tnets Cyber squatters Person or businesses that buy, usually for a nominal fee, & register as web site names descriptive nouns, celebrity names, variations on company trade marks, geographic & ethic group names & pharmaceutical \& other descriptors & then hold them until they can be sold as an inflated price. Sometimes called CSQ CONCILATION - A non binding agreement between parties to resolve...

Words: 3646 - Pages: 15

Common Law

...Apply and analyze the law on standard form contracts in the given scenario 9 Discuss the effect of exemption clauses in attempting to exclude contractual liability in the given scenario 11 LAW OF TORT IN BUSINESS ACTIVITIES AND PARTICULAR FORMS OF TORTIUOS LIABILITY. 12 Describe the nature of general tortuous liability comparing and contrasting to contractual liability 12 Explain the liability applicable to an occupier of premises in the given scenario 13 Discuss the nature of employer’s liability with reference to vicarious liability and health and safety implications taking Mr. Bobs Company as an example 13 Distinguish strict liability from general tortuous liability in the given scenario. 14 ELEMENTS OF THE TORT OF NEGLIGENCE 14 Explain and understand the application of the elements of the tort of negligence 14 Analyse the practical applications of particular element of the tort of negligence in the given scenario. 15 Reference: 16 Abstract The report covers the following areas which are understanding the essential elements of a valid contract and legally binding contract and its role in a business context. It also explores the significance of specific terms in a business contract. Examining the role of the law of tort in business activities assessing particular forms of tortuous liability. Lastly understand and apply the elements to the tort of negligence. Introduction Common law is......

Words: 3228 - Pages: 13

Common Law

...Merrit vs Merrit Case in Business Law Merritt v Merritt [1970] 1 WLR 1211 Court of Appeal A husband left his wife and went to live with another woman. There was £180 left owing on the house which was jointly owned by the couple. The husband signed an agreement whereby he would pay the wife £40 per month to enable her to meet the mortgage payments and if she paid all the charges in connection with the mortgage until it was paid off he would transfer his share of the house to her. When the mortgage was fully paid she brought an action for a declaration that the house belonged to her. Held: The agreement was binding. The Court of Appeal distinguished the case of Balfour v Balfour on the grounds that the parties were separated. Where spouses have separated it is generally considered that they do intend to be bound by their agreements. The written agreement signed was further evidence of an intention to be bound. (This case (Merritt v Merritt [1970] 1WCR 1211) demonstrates that although domestic arrangements are assumed not to create legally-binding obligations (see: Balfour v balfour (1919), Jones vpadav atton (1969)), in some cases this assumption may be overruled by the facts. Mr Merritt and his wife jointly owned a house. Mr Merritt left to live with another woman. They made an agreement (signed) that Mr M would pay Mrs M a monthly sum, and eventually transfer the house to her, if Mrs M kept up the monthly mortgage payments. When the mortgage was payed Mr M refused......

Words: 478 - Pages: 2