How Stable Were the Stresemann Years

In: Historical Events

Submitted By debzsky
Words 3252
Pages 14
How stable were the ‘Stresemann Years’ of the Weimar Republic, 1924-29?

May: Nationalist vote increases in Reichstag elections
August: Reichstag accepts the Dawes Plan

February: Death of President Ebert
April: Hindenburg elected President
October: Locarno Treaties signed

September: Germany admitted the League of Nations

August: Commercial Treaty signed – between France and Germany

May: Number of socialist votes in Reichstag election increase

September: Allies begin military evacuation of the Rhineland
October: Stresemann dies
December: Referendum upholds decision to adopt Young Plan.

Relative Political Stability * This period of the Weimar = absence of attempts to threaten republic * However – no political stability = parliamentary system failed to develop * Main reason for no development: Coalition government = not enough support to tackle issues that faced democracy (blame with political parties) * Some parties still acted as interest groups representing own sectional group rather than national parties government (due to their inexperience in forming govt) * Due to PR – parties need to be cooperative [eg. DVP’s association with business interest made them refuse coalition with SPD in 1926] – therefore frequent political paralysis * Inability to cooperate = inability to tackle social/economic problems * Therefore not really politically stable

Chancellor’s of the Weimar Republic, 1923-30: -
Gustav Streseman (DVP) – August 1923 – November 1923
Wilhelm Marx (Z) – November 1923 – January 1925
Hans Luther (n/a) – January 1925 – May 1926
Wilhelm Marx (Z) – May 1926 – June 1928
Hermann Muller (SPD) – June 1928 – March 1930

Election May 1924 * November 1923 - Stresemann’s government lacked majority support in the Reichstag –Collapsed * Replaced by…...

Similar Documents

How Effective Were Mussolinis Economic Policies

... * Russia was very big but there were no effective ways to transport resources around the countries * Poor communication methods * Russification why was there opposition to tsarist rule? * He was a weak tsar as he was primarily reluctant to taking over * Bloody Sunday * 1905 revolution * Failures of the Dumas * Social democratic party, octobrists, social revolutionaries- revolution through peasants * Ignorant and arrogant What was the impact of ww1 on tsarist Russia? * Lack of available infrastructure- basic facilities banks factories ect. * Poor leadership of generals and officers * Poor communication * Incompetent and overconfident officials * Inflation * Middle class discontented as their sons were dying at war * Large life cost why was there a Feb. rev in feb1917 * First WW put pressure on tsarist system * The weather was so bad so trains wouldn’t function and no import/export * Prices rose and rationing led to further discontent * Series of strikes * Famines and poverty getting worse * ARMY DESERTED THE TSAR WHERAS PRIOR TO THIS HE WAS SUPPORTED BY THEM I.E THROUGHOUT BLOODY SUNDAY RUSSO-JAPANESE * Tsarina Alexandra What were the successes and failures of the provisional government? * They were an unelected body and didn’t represent the people of Russia * THEY DID NOT END THE WAR * Peasants were looting properties of landlords ......

Words: 1198 - Pages: 5

How Far Did the Weimar Republic Recover?

...How far did the Weimar Republic Recover 1923-1929? In 1923, Gustav Stresemann was appointed chancellor in Germany. At the time, world war one had just finished and the Weimar republic was facing a lot of problems. I think Stresemann did bring a recovery however some may say he just papered over the crack which in some cases is very true. However, I think overall he did rescue Germany. I think this because he saved the economy from the hyperinflation; he signed the Dawes plan and sorted out the problems with the treaty of Versailles. However, some people may say he didn’t help Germany because the culture was changed completely and the country basically ran riot. Also, at the time that Stresemann was in charge, politicians were being killed and there were many revolts. In my essay I will argue both sides but finally come to my own conclusion. In 1922, the German government announced that they couldn’t pay anymore reparations to France due to the state of the economy. The country was in far too much debt. Of course the French were not happy and therefore sent 60,000 French and Belgian soldiers to the Ruhr. The government was hated already because a lot of people blamed them for signing the treaty in the first place which meant they had to pay reparations to France they couldn’t afford. The government told the workers at the Ruhr to refuse to collaborate with the French, consequently, the industrial production stopped. This caused a rise in unemployment and a rise in Poverty.......

Words: 2725 - Pages: 11

How Successful Were the Five – Year Plans in Transforming Russian Industry in the Years Up to 1941?

...Molly Morris 22.03.2013 ‘How successful were the Five – Year plans in transforming Russian Industry in the years up to 1941? (June 2010) There is no doubt that to some extent, Stalin’s industrialisation process was a success in industrialising Russia as not only did he make use of Russia’s resources and invested them into beneficial industries, such as the massive hydroelectric Dnieprostroi Dam built to generate electricity on the river Dnieper, he also developed heavy industries such as coal, iron, steel and oil in order to increase output, which in turn increased foreign trade and international relations and led to the result of Russia becoming one of the leading industrial powers of Europe, highlighting that the five year plans were successful in industrialising Russia. However, it could be argued that the rushed procedure and ridiculously high targets set by the USSR can also allow the argument that although Russia did industrialise at a fast pace which benefited Russia’s industry, The unrealistic targets that were set meant that managers were more concerned about the quantity of what they produced, not the quality implying that the five year plans only benefitted Russia’s industry for the short term and did not provide Russia with the long term industrialised plans it needed in order to progress suggesting the plans were not a success. Firstly, there are various factors to suggest the five years plans did successfully industrialize Russia such as Oil exceeding......

Words: 856 - Pages: 4

How Succesful Were the Nazi Economic Policies in the Years 1933 - 1945?

...During the years 1933 – 1945, Hitler and the Nazi party introduced various policies in which impacted the economy, is it necessary to label them all a success? The most successive policy that they announced was those in which was led by Albert Speer, this had a great influence on both the economy and the final stages of war; despite Germany being unsuccessful. The first policy that was introduced was the “New plan” which was created by Hjalmar Schacht in the year 1933. Schacht intended to reduce imports, reduce unemployment, create agreements with other nations and finally channel the government’s spending. In some perspective, the “New plan” was a success; unemployment had decreased significantly, it was reduced from 6 million in 1933 to 300,000 by 1939. Moreover, industrial production had rose considerably in comparison with Weimar Germany before the Wall Street Crash. Due to these factors, it can be interpreted as a great success however, there are features that hinder it. Firstly, Germany were still importing a huge amount of their produce, they failed to produce the same amount of money that they were spending; by 1939 the German government were in debt of 40 million Reichmarks. As a result of this, the new plan cannot be labelled as a great success, however there were aspects that influenced the success of other policies. As the war drew closer, Hitler was aware that the country was not prepared for confrontation therefore he advised his Nazi associate – Goering,......

Words: 994 - Pages: 4

How Effective Were the Police by 1860?

...How effective were the police by 1860? “The government wanted to avoid rumours that the police were like the military so officers were unarmed. Their uniforms were very different from that of the military. It was down to the determination not to be like the military, so many people were uncertain of what the police actually did. This tended to cause a lot of early complaints. This could negatively impact the effectiveness of the police force if people were this unsure about them.” This source suggests that there was an element of distrust, as the people did not know what the police did, thus the police force’s work was doubled, as not only did they have to combat crime, but they also had to reassure the public that they were not a military force, and that they could be trusted. Therefore, initially this might have led to many crimes being unreported, making the force ineffective. “This source shows the inconsistency of crime prevention in the growing industrial cities in the early 19th century. Where Newcastle had an 'efficient force' other areas such as Liverpool were 'policed by a mix of watchmen and parish constables'. There were also problems in rural areas with issues such as "Captain Swing" violence becoming prominent in 1828-32.” Again, this could show that in some areas the police were ineffective due to mistrust, and shows that with crime increasing in the early 1800s, the older methods with the “watchman” were inadequate to deal with it, thus a new system was......

Words: 1198 - Pages: 5

How Successful Were Wolsey's Domestic Policies

...How successful were Wolsey’s domestic policies? Law One area that Wolsey did try to reform was England’s legal system. England mainly used common law at that time however civil law was seen as more modern and was favored in southern Europe. Civil law was used in the King’s council when it acted as a court of law. As Lord Chancellor Wolsey had oversight over the legal system in England. The law awakened Wolsey’s intellectual interest. He was a judge in the Chancery Court and handled disputes over wills, contracts and property. He had successfully reformed the Star Chamber where he was determined to get rid of corruption. He made it much fairer, cheaper and more efficient and was not afraid to take on the powerful. He had the Earl of Northumberland jailed for contempt of court. Wolsey Had genuine concern and wanted to improve the administration. He knew that common law courts were controlled by money which made it impossible for the poor to use so they could not get any justice. There were many problems with Common law for example the decisions of courts could be corruptly influenced or ignored by the powerful, cases took too long to resolve causing them to be very expensive which most people could not afford. Wolsey’s solution to all these problems was to increase the role of the prerogative courts which developed from the king’s council. The system that these courts would use was called “equity” and it was based on common sense and what seemed fairer rather that the common......

Words: 1400 - Pages: 6

How Successful Were Stalin's Economic Policies

...How successful were Stalin's economic policies? Stalin introduced the Five Year Plans and collectivisation as his economic policies to improve Russia's industrial backwardness. Collectivisation consisted of state controlled farms, as 90% of the produce would go to the state. The peasants would join their small individual plots to form communal farms, leading to larger amounts of food. The five year plans were aimed at industrial improvements in agriculture and factories. In purely economic terms, his policies were a success they provided a number of solutions to problems like the state's inability to afford to pay high prices for grain. The Five Year Plans built vast factories in places like Stalingrad, Leningrad and other cities across Russia. These improved the production output a lot with coal production jumping from 35.4 million tonnes in the 1927-1928 years to 128 million tonnes in 1937. Hydro-electric dams, canals, railways and other infrastructural projects took place, aiming to modernise Russia. This also helped Russia catch up with countries like Britain, USA and and Germany. As Stalin had warned in February 1931 "We are 50-100 years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this lag in ten years. If we don't do it, they'll crush us!". Other than act as propaganda for the Communists by suggesting they could be crushed by foreigners it shows that Stalin's polices were a success in industry terms. Russian life had drastically changed from living in......

Words: 714 - Pages: 3

How Far Were the Divisions Among Its Opponents Responsible for the Survival of Tsarist Rule in the Years 1881-1905?

...How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905? (30 marks) Around Europe the world’s great powers were developing, both economically and socially through the benefits of industrialisation, except that was for Russia, who was now the most economically backward. The climate for change was surrounding its empire. The people of the empire were ready for a revolution yet Russia’s tsarist rule managed to survived from 1881-1905 under the rule of Alexander III who ruled from 1881-1894 and his son Nikolas II who ruled 1894-1905. Tsarist rule in Russia had its many opponents from the larger radical parties such as the Social Democrats and the Social Revolutionaries, however some argue that it was the divides in these groups and society as a whole that had delayed the revolution whilst others believe it was the result of external factors that allowed the tsarist regime to continue through the animosity it faced. A major divide in the opponents of tsarist rule was class. The divide in personal wealth was larger in Russia than in any other world super power. With the landed classes obtaining most of the wealth and the peasantry and former surfs who made up 80 % of the population however barely getting by, this economic divide caused a major divide in society. The educated classes apposed the tsarist regime due the fact it halted their position in society not allowing them to move up and benefited only the landed......

Words: 1385 - Pages: 6

The Stable

...The stable We lived on a farm with many animals there were pigs, horses, cows and hens. It was placed near to a friendly town, where people where good hearted and was always fond to help out on our farm. We had a big red silo for our corns, which we would harvest from our okras, and our many acres of fields. Our house is placed in the centre of our lands, and it is a big white wood house, which we have build by our own hands, with a ground floor and a first floor, and a big terrace to the backyard and a total of 137 square feet. We just finished it last year, which was the year of 2005, it has been in progress for 10 years. We just began our new project, which is a new larger stable, so we can fit our growing amount of animals. It was a bad wetter, the rain was purring down outside, so we were forced to stay inside the house. The temperature was high, because we were in the beginning of May; the sun was just starting to make its appearance in the horizon, the weather was very moist and the air was thick so it was obnoxious to stay outside. We lived 4 people on the farm; there were my foster parents Hanna, Rick, my uncle Billy, and myself Carl. Hanna was at the age of 50, Rick was 60, and uncle Billy was 50 years old and I was 9 years old. Hanna and Rick were nice people, they cared about me, they made sure I was well fed and had clothes to wear. Rick on the other hand, he was the sheriff of the small town close to the farm. He was a mean man, he talked down to me, he...

Words: 764 - Pages: 4

How Far Were the Federal Government and the Supreme Court Responsible for the Changing Status of African Americans in the Years 1945-1968?

...1957, Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and there were others which showed African Americans that progress was being made. The Presidents clearly initiated a change in America making sure de jure became de facto. However, there were many flaws in the work of the Federal Government and there were other factors which changed the status for African Americans such as the impact of the Second World War and the actions of the NAACP. President Harry Truman (1945-1953), established a liberal civil rights committee to investigate the violence against blacks. A report was produced called “To Secure These Rights” which underlined the problems that African Americans faced during this period. It said that the USA could not claim to lead the free world if Blacks were not equal. This proved that the Federal Government did play a part in changing the status for Black Americans as a previously racist President was motivated to change the way Blacks were treated which was a big step towards social equality. Moreover, in 1948, Truman ended segregation in the armed forces by signing the Executive Order 9981 which guarantied equality and opportunity for all persons ion the armed forces without regard to race, colour, religion or national origin. Again this proved that there was change for Blacks because segregation was now over in the armed forces and it was another step towards full abolishment of segregation. Truman’s words were backed up by action and in this case, de jure did......

Words: 2234 - Pages: 9

How to Year Up

...including: advisor, internship supervisor, mentor, writer of Year Up recommendation, former employers, coworkers, guidance counselors List all 5 here: _____________________________ _____________________________ _____________________________ _____________________________ ____________________________  Summary     6-8 sentences No clichés or grammatical errors Supported by examples of relevant work experience Compelling case for why student is a great hire  Experience   Picture Full, description of each role All relevant experiences are listed   Skills   4-6 skills listed Skills are consistent with student’s brand    Education    College Partner and Year Up are listed Degrees, dates attended, activities, and awards included Groups  Recommendations   2 recommendations listed (YU staff member, mentor, or co-worker (above intern level)) List 2 of the people who have recommended you here: _____________________________ ____________________________   Connections  Photo is a professional – looking “head shot” of just the shoulders and head Photo conveys warmth and friendliness, and hopefully, a smile!  There is no one else in the photo Photo is not blurry or hard to see Professional attire is worn in the photo Photo has a plain background that does not distract from the rest of the picture Joined “Year Up Alumni – for graduates and supporters”......

Words: 267 - Pages: 2

To What Extent Was Gustav Stresemann Responsible for the Increased Stability in Germany in the Years 1924-1929?

...To what extent was Gustav Stresemann responsible for the increased stability in Germany in the years 1924-1929? Between the years of 1924 and 1929, Gustav Stresemann had a huge influence over Germany and helped it regain stability after World War One and hyperinflation. Before he took charge and became chancellor in 1923 Germany’s economy was extremely unstable, Stresemann came to power to resolve many of Germany’s issues. There were many reasons why Stresemann was responsible for the stability, some of these included the end of passive resistance, the Dawes plan and the change in currency, all of these were good factors however some did hold some negative effects, He focused on improving the economy, relations with other countries and improving the social aspects of living. Although Stresemann’s actions and policies had both good and bad sides, overall it was because of these that Stresemann is responsible for the regained stability of Germany. Stresemann changed the currency when he became chancellor after 1923 from the deutch mark to the Rentenmark, this put an end to hyperinflation. Hyperinflation meant that the German currency became almost completely worthless with price rising by thousands from one day to the next. By making this change, Stresemann gave the Rentenmark a better value and allowed Germany to get out of the, what seemed endless, hyperinflation. However this had a negative effect too as the money the middle and working class lost during hyperinflation,......

Words: 723 - Pages: 3

How Asian Americans Were Portrayed in Children’s Books

...condescend other minorities; however, it was very hard for the minorities to fight back stereotypes because of white domination and prejudices of Asian American ethnicities, especially in area such as Asian American children’s and adolescent literature in the past where there were more white writers comparing to Asian American writers. Reviewers had found that most of the books contained stereotypes, prejudices, and discriminations of Asian Americans because those authors of Asian American books had manipulated tones such as imprudent, conclusive, derisive, condescending, and derogated to identify Asian American cultures. Reviewers found that some authors were using imprudent and conclusive tones to conclude what a group of Asian Americans and even one ethnicity of Asian Americans should be based on their own perceptions. For instance, Fire Dragon, a book by Barbara Benezra, was stated by the reviewers that it used misconceptions and outdated information to depict the social status of Chinese American women that readers might be confused with the conditions in the past with the present. (Interracial 9) Other stereotypes that occurred frequently in the stories were that Asian American ethnicities were pertained to certain jobs, physical traits, and characteristics. Examples could be found in Mr. Charley’s Chopsticks (a book written by Doris P. Evans) that depicted Chinese American with characteristics such as using chopsticks for various purposes, speaking in pidgin......

Words: 281 - Pages: 2

‘Sino-Soviet Relations, in the Years 1958-69, Were Undermined Primarily by Conflicting National Interests.’ How Far Do You Agree with This View?

...‘Sino-Soviet relations, in the years 1958-69, were undermined primarily by conflicting national interests.’ How far do you agree with this view? Introduction It is to a large extent that Sino-Soviet relations, in the years 1958-69, were primarily undermined by conflicting national interests. This is elucidated in factors or events such as Sino-Soviet rivalry over Mongolia, Sino-Soviet border disputes such as Damansky/Chenbao (1969), China’s reaction to the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia (1968) among many others. Nevertheless, other factors such as ideological conflict for example competing Soviet and Chinese claims for the leadership of international communism, China’s negative response to Soviet de-Stalinisation, Soviet ‘peaceful coexistence’ versus Mao’s commitment to ‘continuing revolution’ at a time when China was confronting the USA among many others undermined Sino-Soviet relations. 1. Sino-Soviet rivalry over Mongolia Sino-Soviet rivalry over Mongolia. The Chinese regarded Mongolia in their own sphere of influence, yet Stalin and Khrushchev refused to reduce their ties. Despite the Chinese signing the Treaty of Friendship with the Soviet Union in 1950, the Chinese failed to get an agreement off the Soviets, promising to limit their influence in Mongolia. Obviously, this would generate tension as the Chinese disliked how their power was limited. 2. Sino-Soviet border disputes such as Damansky/Chenbao (1969) Sino-Soviet border disputes such as......

Words: 1086 - Pages: 5

How the Pyramids Were Built

...mystery behind how the pyramids were built The Pyramids at Giza remain one of the most amazing architectural works in history and the Great Pyramid stands as one of the last surviving wonders of the ancient world. There are many theories revolving around the construction of Egypt’s pyramids: one of which is that the Hebrews slaves under the control of the pharaoh Khufu built the pyramids. Another theory suggests that human beings were not involved in the building of the pyramids but instead these structures were built by extra-terrestrial or alien forces. The first of the theories involves a famous Greek historian called Herodotus who traveled to Egypt around 430 B.C. Based upon his observation and findings, Herodotus came to the conclusion that the pyramids were built by demoralized Hebrew slaves working under the command of the immoral pharaoh named Khufu. Throughout the years and until today, this is the theory that is accepted by most people. However, researchers and archeologists have yet to provide hard evidence proving the theory. The theory suggests a vast number of slaves were available to build the pyramids under the labor conditions of that time. According to mainstream archeology, there is no proof whatsoever of slavery existing near Giza during the time when the pyramids were thought to, have been built. Even ancient arts or architecture of the Egyptians do not show any records of slavery ever being used to build the pyramids. Also, recently, villages were......

Words: 1027 - Pages: 5