Submitted By activitymode

Words 1168

Pages 5

Words 1168

Pages 5

To purchase this, Click here http://www.activitymode.com/product/hlt-362-module-4-exercise-36/ Contact us at:

SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM

HLT 362 MODULE 4 EXERCISE 36

The researchers found a significant difference between the two groups (control and treatment) for change in mobility of the women with osteoarthritis (OA) over 12 weeks with the results of F(1, 22) 9.619, p 0.005. Discuss each aspect of these results.

State the null hypothesis for the Baird and Sands (2004) study that focuses on the effect of the GI with PMR treatment on patients’ mobility level. Should the null hypothesis be rejected for the difference between the two groups in change in mobility scores over 12 weeks? Provide a rationale for your answer.

The researchers stated that the participants in the intervention group reported a reduction in mobility difficulty at week 12. Was this result statistically significant, and if so at what probability?

If the researchers had set the level of significance or = 0.01, would the results of p 0.001 still be statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer.

If F(3, 60) 4.13, p 0.04, and = 0.01, is the result statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. Would the null hypothesis be accepted or rejected?

Can ANOVA be used to test proposed relationships or predicted correlations between variables in a single group? Provide a rationale for your answer.

If a study had a result of F(2, 147) 4.56, p 0.003, how many groups were in the study, and what was the sample size?

The researchers state that the sample for their study was 28 women with a diagnosis of OA, and that 18 were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 10 were randomly assigned to the control group. Discuss the study strengths and/or weaknesses in this statement.

In your opinion, have the researchers established that…...

...the GI with PMR treatment on patients’ mobility level. Should the null hypothesis be rejected for the difference between the two groups in change in mobility scores over 12 weeks? Provide a rationale for your answer.” The null hypothesis is that the mean mobility scores for both groups are the same, since the p-value 0.005 < 0.05 the null hypothesis can be rejected. Therefore the mean difficulty with mobility score for both groups must be different. “3. The researchers stated that the participants in the intervention group reported a reduction in mobility difficulty at week 12. Was this result statistically significant, and if so at what probability?” Yes, the result was statistically significant at probability p < 0.001. “4. If the researchers had set the level of significance or α= 0.01, would the results of p = 0.001 still be statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer.” Yes, the results will still be statistically significant because 0.001 < 0.01 “5. If F(3, 60) = 4.13, p = 0.04, and α = 0.01, is the result statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. Would the null hypothesis be accepted or rejected?” In this case the result would not be considered statistically significant because 0.04 > 0.01 “6. Can ANOVA be used to test proposed relationships or predicted correlations between variables in a single group? Provide a rationale for your answer.” No, ANOVA cannot be used to test proposed relationship or......

Words: 712 - Pages: 3

...HLT 362 Module 1 Exercise 16 IF You Want To Purchase A+ Work Then Click The Link Below , Instant Download http://hwnerd.com/HLT-362-Module-1-Exercise-16-3212222.htm?categoryId=-1 If You Face Any Problem E- Mail Us At Contact.Hwnerd@Gmail.Com 1- The researchers analyzed the data they collected as though it were at what level of measurement? (Your choices are: Nominal, Ordinal, Interval/ratio, or Experimental) 2- What was the mean posttest empowerment score for the control group? 3- Compare the mean baseline and posttest depression scores of the experimental group. Was this an expected finding? Provide a rationale for your answer. 4- Compare the mean baseline and posttest depression scores of the control group. Do these scores strengthen or weaken the validity of the research results? Provide a rationale for your answer. 5- Which group’s test scores had the least amount of variability or dispersion? Provide a rationale for your answer. 6 - Did the empowerment variable or self-care self-efficacy variable demonstrate the greatest amount of dispersion? Provide a rationale for your answer. 7 - The mean (X ̅) is a measure of a distribution while the SD is a measure of its scores. Both X ̅ and SD are statistics. 8 - What was the mean severity for renal disease for the research subjects? What was the dispersion or variability of the renal disease severity scores? Did the severity scores vary significantly between the control and the......

Words: 308 - Pages: 2

...HLT 362 Module 4 Exercise 36 IF You Want To Purchase A+ Work Then Click The Link Below , Instant Download http://hwnerd.com/HLT-362-Module-4-Exercise-36-539555.htm?categoryId=-1 If You Face Any Problem E- Mail Us At Contact.Hwnerd@Gmail.Com The researchers found a significant difference between the two groups (control and treatment) for change in mobility of the women with osteoarthritis (OA) over 12 weeks with the results of F(1, 22) 9.619, p 0.005. Discuss each aspect of these results. State the null hypothesis for the Baird and Sands (2004) study that focuses on the effect of the GI with PMR treatment on patients’ mobility level. Should the null hypothesis be rejected for the difference between the two groups in change in mobility scores over 12 weeks? Provide a rationale for your answer. The researchers stated that the participants in the intervention group reported a reduction in mobility difficulty at week 12. Was this result statistically significant, and if so at what probability? If the researchers had set the level of significance or = 0.01, would the results of p 0.001 still be statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. If F(3, 60) 4.13, p 0.04, and = 0.01, is the result statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. Would the null hypothesis be accepted or rejected? Can ANOVA be used to test proposed relationships or predicted correlations between variables in a single group? Provide a......

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

...HLT 362 Module 4 Exercise 36 IF You Want To Purchase A+ Work Then Click The Link Below , Instant Download http://hwnerd.com/HLT-362-Module-4-Exercise-36-539555.htm?categoryId=-1 If You Face Any Problem E- Mail Us At Contact.Hwnerd@Gmail.Com The researchers found a significant difference between the two groups (control and treatment) for change in mobility of the women with osteoarthritis (OA) over 12 weeks with the results of F(1, 22) 9.619, p 0.005. Discuss each aspect of these results. State the null hypothesis for the Baird and Sands (2004) study that focuses on the effect of the GI with PMR treatment on patients’ mobility level. Should the null hypothesis be rejected for the difference between the two groups in change in mobility scores over 12 weeks? Provide a rationale for your answer. The researchers stated that the participants in the intervention group reported a reduction in mobility difficulty at week 12. Was this result statistically significant, and if so at what probability? If the researchers had set the level of significance or = 0.01, would the results of p 0.001 still be statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. If F(3, 60) 4.13, p 0.04, and = 0.01, is the result statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. Would the null hypothesis be accepted or rejected? Can ANOVA be used to test proposed relationships or predicted correlations between variables in a single group? Provide a......

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

...HLT 362 Module 4 Exercise 36 IF You Want To Purchase A+ Work Then Click The Link Below , Instant Download http://hwnerd.com/HLT-362-Module-4-Exercise-36-539555.htm?categoryId=-1 If You Face Any Problem E- Mail Us At Contact.Hwnerd@Gmail.Com The researchers found a significant difference between the two groups (control and treatment) for change in mobility of the women with osteoarthritis (OA) over 12 weeks with the results of F(1, 22) 9.619, p 0.005. Discuss each aspect of these results. State the null hypothesis for the Baird and Sands (2004) study that focuses on the effect of the GI with PMR treatment on patients’ mobility level. Should the null hypothesis be rejected for the difference between the two groups in change in mobility scores over 12 weeks? Provide a rationale for your answer. The researchers stated that the participants in the intervention group reported a reduction in mobility difficulty at week 12. Was this result statistically significant, and if so at what probability? If the researchers had set the level of significance or = 0.01, would the results of p 0.001 still be statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. If F(3, 60) 4.13, p 0.04, and = 0.01, is the result statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. Would the null hypothesis be accepted or rejected? Can ANOVA be used to test proposed relationships or predicted correlations between variables in a single group? Provide a......

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

...HLT 362 MODULE 4 EXERCISE 36 To buy this click here http://www.coursehomework.com/product/hlt-362-module-4-exercise-36/ Contact us:+1 315-750-4434 help@coursehomework.com HLT 362 MODULE 4 EXERCISE 36 The researchers found a significant difference between the two groups (control and treatment) for change in mobility of the women with osteoarthritis (OA) over 12 weeks with the results of F(1, 22) 9.619, p 0.005. Discuss each aspect of these results. State the null hypothesis for the Baird and Sands (2004) study that focuses on the effect of the GI with PMR treatment on patients’ mobility level. Should the null hypothesis be rejected for the difference between the two groups in change in mobility scores over 12 weeks? Provide a rationale for your answer. The researchers stated that the participants in the intervention group reported a reduction in mobility difficulty at week 12. Was this result statistically significant, and if so at what probability? If the researchers had set the level of significance or = 0.01, would the results of p 0.001 still be statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. If F(3, 60) 4.13, p 0.04, and = 0.01, is the result statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. Would the null hypothesis be accepted or rejected? Can ANOVA be used to test proposed relationships or predicted correlations between variables in a single group? Provide a rationale for your answer. If a study had a result of F(2, 147)...

Words: 393 - Pages: 2

...HLT 362 Module 4 Exercise 36 IF You Want To Purchase A+ Work Then Click The Link Below , Instant Download http://acehomework.com/HLT-362-Module-4-Exercise-36-11793212.htm?categoryId=-1 If You Face Any Problem E- Mail Us At JOHNMATE1122@Gmail.Com The researchers found a significant difference between the two groups (control and treatment) for change in mobility of the women with osteoarthritis (OA) over 12 weeks with the results of F(1, 22) 9.619, p 0.005. Discuss each aspect of these results. State the null hypothesis for the Baird and Sands (2004) study that focuses on the effect of the GI with PMR treatment on patients’ mobility level. Should the null hypothesis be rejected for the difference between the two groups in change in mobility scores over 12 weeks? Provide a rationale for your answer. The researchers stated that the participants in the intervention group reported a reduction in mobility difficulty at week 12. Was this result statistically significant, and if so at what probability? If the researchers had set the level of significance or = 0.01, would the results of p 0.001 still be statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. If F(3, 60) 4.13, p 0.04, and = 0.01, is the result statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. Would the null hypothesis be accepted or rejected? Can ANOVA be used to test proposed relationships or predicted correlations between variables in a single group? Provide a......

Words: 401 - Pages: 2

...A++PAPER;http://www.homeworkproviders.com/shop/hlt-362-module-4-exercise-36/ HLT 362 MODULE 4 EXERCISE 36 HLT 362 MODULE 4 EXERCISE 36, The researchers found a significant difference between the two groups (control and treatment) for change in mobility of the women with osteoarthritis (OA) over 12 weeks with the results of F(1, 22) 9.619, p 0.005. Discuss each aspect of these results. State the null hypothesis for the Baird and Sands (2004) study that focuses on the effect of the GI with PMR treatment on patients’ mobility level. Should the null hypothesis be rejected for the difference between the two groups in change in mobility scores over 12 weeks? Provide a rationale for your answer. The researchers stated that the participants in the intervention group reported a reduction in mobility difficulty at week 12. Was this result statistically significant, and if so at what probability? If the researchers had set the level of significance or = 0.01, would the results of p 0.001 still be statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. If F(3, 60) 4.13, p 0.04, and = 0.01, is the result statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. Would the null hypothesis be accepted or rejected? Can ANOVA be used to test proposed relationships or predicted correlations between variables in a single group? Provide a rationale for your answer. If a study had a result of F(2, 147) 4.56, p 0.003, how many groups were in the study, and what was......

Words: 381 - Pages: 2

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

...HLT 362 MODULE 4 EXERCISE 36 A+ Graded Tutorial Available At: http://hwsoloutions.com/?product=hlt-362-module-4-exercise-36 Visit Our website: http://hwsoloutions.com/ Product Description HLT 362 MODULE 4 EXERCISE 36, The researchers found a significant difference between the two groups (control and treatment) for change in mobility of the women with osteoarthritis (OA) over 12 weeks with the results of F(1, 22) 9.619, p 0.005. Discuss each aspect of these results. State the null hypothesis for the Baird and Sands (2004) study that focuses on the effect of the GI with PMR treatment on patients’ mobility level. Should the null hypothesis be rejected for the difference between the two groups in change in mobility scores over 12 weeks? Provide a rationale for your answer. The researchers stated that the participants in the intervention group reported a reduction in mobility difficulty at week 12. Was this result statistically significant, and if so at what probability? If the researchers had set the level of significance or = 0.01, would the results of p 0.001 still be statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. If F(3, 60) 4.13, p 0.04, and = 0.01, is the result statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. Would the null hypothesis be accepted or rejected? Can ANOVA be used to test proposed relationships or predicted correlations between variables in a single group? Provide a rationale for your answer. If a study had a......

Words: 391 - Pages: 2

...HLT 362 Module 4 Exercise 36 Click Link Below To Buy: http://hwcampus.com/shop/hlt-362-module-5-exercise-40-chi-square-x2/ The researchers found a significant difference between the two groups (control and treatment) for change in mobility of the women with osteoarthritis (OA) over 12 weeks with the results of F(1, 22) 9.619, p 0.005. Discuss each aspect of these results. State the null hypothesis for the Baird and Sands (2004) study that focuses on the effect of the GI with PMR treatment on patients’ mobility level. Should the null hypothesis be rejected for the difference between the two groups in change in mobility scores over 12 weeks? Provide a rationale for your answer. The researchers stated that the participants in the intervention group reported a reduction in mobility difficulty at week 12. Was this result statistically significant, and if so at what probability? If the researchers had set the level of significance or = 0.01, would the results of p 0.001 still be statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. If F(3, 60) 4.13, p 0.04, and = 0.01, is the result statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. Would the null hypothesis be accepted or rejected? Can ANOVA be used to test proposed relationships or predicted correlations between variables in a single group? Provide a rationale for your answer. If a study had a result of F(2, 147) 4.56, p 0.003, how many groups were in the study, and......

Words: 380 - Pages: 2

...HLT 362 Module 4 Exercise 36 Click Link Below To Buy: http://hwcampus.com/shop/hlt-362-module-5-exercise-40-chi-square-x2/ The researchers found a significant difference between the two groups (control and treatment) for change in mobility of the women with osteoarthritis (OA) over 12 weeks with the results of F(1, 22) 9.619, p 0.005. Discuss each aspect of these results. State the null hypothesis for the Baird and Sands (2004) study that focuses on the effect of the GI with PMR treatment on patients’ mobility level. Should the null hypothesis be rejected for the difference between the two groups in change in mobility scores over 12 weeks? Provide a rationale for your answer. The researchers stated that the participants in the intervention group reported a reduction in mobility difficulty at week 12. Was this result statistically significant, and if so at what probability? If the researchers had set the level of significance or = 0.01, would the results of p 0.001 still be statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. If F(3, 60) 4.13, p 0.04, and = 0.01, is the result statistically significant? Provide a rationale for your answer. Would the null hypothesis be accepted or rejected? Can ANOVA be used to test proposed relationships or predicted correlations between variables in a single group? Provide a rationale for your answer. If a study had a result of F(2, 147) 4.56, p 0.003, how many groups were in the study, and......

Words: 380 - Pages: 2