Free Essay

Hedonism

In: English and Literature

Submitted By riadestyan
Words 484
Pages 2
summary
Gatsby was born on a North Dakota farm, and though he attended college at St. Olaf’s in Minnesota. One day, he saw a yacht owned by Dan Cody, a wealthy copper mogul, who gave his name as Jay Gatsby, on board his yacht as his personal assistant. When Cody died, he left Gatsby $25,000. Gatsby then dedicated himself to becoming a wealthy and successful man. he is alarmed to find Tom Buchanan there. The following Saturday night, Tom and Daisy go to a party at Gatsby’s house. Gatsby seeks out Nick after Tom and Daisy leave the party. he is unhappy because Daisy has had such an unpleasant time. Gatsby wants things to be exactly the same as they were before he left Louisville, he wants Daisy to leave Tom so that he can be with her.
Daisy seems almost uninterested in her child. During the awkward afternoon, Gatsby and Daisy cannot hide their love for one another. Daisy asks Gatsby if he wants to go into the city. Tom asks Gatsby about his intentions for Daisy, and Gatsby replies that Daisy loves him, not Tom. Tom claims that he and Daisy have a history that Gatsby could not possibly understand. Tom accuses Gatsby of running a bootlegging operation. Daisy, in love with Gatsby earlier in the afternoon, Tom sends Daisy back to Long Island with Gatsby to prove Gatsby’s inability to hurt him. As the row quiets down, Nick realizes that it is his thirtieth birthday. Driving back to Long Island, Nick, Tom, and Jordan discover a frightening scene on the border of the valley of ashes. Michaelis, a Greek man who runs the restaurant next to Wilson’s garage, tells them that Myrtle was the victim—a car coming from New York City struck her, paused, then sped away. Nick realizes that Myrtle must have been hit by Gatsby and Daisy, driving back from the city in Gatsby’s big yellow automobile.
Nick warns Gatsby that he should go away for a while. Gatsby can't imagine leaving Daisy at this moment, so he stays. this was the first moment nick learned of Gatsby's history. George Wilson stays up all night talking to Michaelis about Myrtle. He tells him that before Myrtle died, he confronted her about her lover and told her that she could not hide her sin from the eyes of God. The morning after the accident, the eyes of Doctor T. J. Eckleburg, believes the conclusion that whoever was driving the car that killed Myrtle must have been her lover. Wilson shoots Gatsby, killing him instantly, then shoots himself. Nick hurries back to West Egg and finds Gatsby floating dead in his pool. two years after Gatsby’s death, Nick describes the events that surrounded the funeral. Swarms of reporters, journalists, and gossipmongers descend on the mansion in the aftermath of the murder. Daisy refused to come by moving away.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Ethics

...consequences of that action are more favorable than unfavorable. Legally the company has to obey the law by providing solid health and safety management system The company compliance statement Compliance Statement An employee, who sustains injury whilst on duty must, must immediately report to his supervisor. An accident report from must be completed by the supervisor, employee and (if any) witness. Payments will not be processed unless an accident report form is completed and submitted to the human resources department Hedonism is a school of thought that argues that pleasure is the only intrinsic good.[1] In very simple terms, a hedonist strives to maximise net pleasure (pleasure minus pain). Ethical hedonism is the idea that all people have the right to do everything in their power to achieve the greatest amount of pleasure possible to them. It is also the idea that every person's pleasure should far surpass their amount of pain. Ethical hedonism is said to have been started by a student of Socrates,Aristippus of Cyrene. He held the idea that pleasure is the highest good.[2]...

Words: 295 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Hedonism and Desire Satisfaction Theory

... Hedonism and the desire-satisfaction theory Name Institution Introduction Hedonism and the desire-satisfaction theory of welfare are typically seen as archrivals in the contest over identifying what makes one’s life better. It is surprising, then, that the most plausible form of hedonism is desire satisfactionism. The hedonism theory focuses on pleasure/happiness while the desire-satisfaction theory elucidates the relevance of fulfilling our desires. Pleasure, in some points of view is the subjective satisfaction of desire. I will explain the similarities and the differences between the desire-satisfaction theory of value and hedonism. I will also discuss the most successful theory and defend my argument by explaining how the theory avoids the objections raised against it. Similarities between the desire-satisfaction theory of value and hedonism Both the desire satisfaction theory and the hedonism theory suggest that our subjective states are the major determinants of the measure of a good life. The subjective states in this case include happiness or pleasure and our desires. Our pleasures are determined by the desire satisfaction theory while happiness is achieved through the hedonism theory. Both theories are dependent on positive values which are the sole intrinsic causes of good life. Differences between the desire-satisfaction theory of value and hedonism The hedonism theory is a deeply important theory of the good. According to hedonism theory, happiness or pleasure...

Words: 868 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Explain and Defend Your Preferred Theory of Happiness (Externalist Theory of Happiness)

...focus on hedonism, which is one of the major and most well known theories of happiness. The main argue in hedonism is that hedonists says that to be happy you need to experience as much pleasure as possible, and as little pain as possible. I argue that this is wrong because you often desire and receive pleasure from doing painful things. For instance, a person whose hobby is boxing or other fight sports loves what he does and this makes him happy even though it requires him to experience a lot of pain when being beaten up by others. According to hedonism this means that he is not living a happy life even though he loves what he does, because the pain might exceed the pleasure at many times. Also, a person experiencing a lot of pleasure might not consider his life as a happy life, but according to hedonism his life must be happy if this is the case. Imagine a man who has no friends and no family because everyone died in some natural disaster and he was the only one who survived. He does not feel like he has anything left to live for, but he now has a great amount of money because of the loss of his family who all were well insured. The man is dealing with the situation very badly and to keep his mind off his now miserable life, he hires prostitutes that spend most of the day at his house. He experiences much pleasure through this, but he does not consider his life as a happy life. If dividing hedonism into narrow hedonism and preference hedonism, I think preference hedonism......

Words: 2195 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Happiness Without Truth

...search for what happiness consists of. You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life” (Camus, The Stranger) and he is correct. Trying to learn or understand a formula to be happy is futile and trying to figure out the ultimate Truth and Reality of the world will only make you miserable. There are two ideologies that I blend together and align myself with; Epicureanism and the idea that the greatest pleasures cannot be achieved without some pain. People should be more concerned with achieving happiness through the experiences they have rather than trying to understand and cope with the harsh Realities and Truths of the world. Epicureanism follows the thoughts of Epicurus, who believed in a type of “ethical hedonism.” This idea of “ethical hedonism” means to pursue pleasure with the only conscious experience you have and to avoid pain, obey the laws, and be honest. The model life he wanted to live can be described through attaining a happy, tranquil life, achieved through peace, freedom from fear, the absence of pain, and by living a self-sufficient life surrounded by friends. (Borchert et al., Encyclopedia of Philosophy) You have to experience everything to the right degree. Everyone should know their own point of “enough.” Epicurus said, "Nothing is enough for the man to whom enough is too little." (Epicurus, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) This means to someone who does not know their limits, no degree of happiness is enough. One way to reach......

Words: 1472 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Utilitarian vs Hedonism

...it true that what was left for him was merely a sense of unhappiness? What can the individual do to prevent such accident in the future? Does that even matter since the individual already lost his eyes? Therefore, we come to an understanding that what makes us happy is merely relevant to our surrounding and community, and possibly temporary. Which is why we are in constant battle, in life, to find some sort of permanent or long lasting happiness. Is this why we accept the possibility of life after death? Is this why we tend to believe in a place like “heaven” in which the happiness is absolute and permanent? (Text, Pg 110-113) 2. Hedonism is an inward looking of pleasure and happiness rather than looking at things as a whole. Hedonism is very much individualistic and so what matters is the happiness of the individual not the society. Hedonism asks “what course of action leads to the most pleasure for me” and a Utilitarian asks, "what causes the greatest good for all of society?” Utilitarian gained popularity within social and political theory because it is all about society and what brings goodness and happiness for the society and the community we are living at and the happiness that is equally spreads between the citizens of that society. The idea of looking after our own happiness seems to be an act of being selfish, however, looking to bring happiness for everyone in the society seems to be an act of kindness cause not only the act itself brought happiness to the......

Words: 1795 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Hedonism, Desire Satisfaction, and a Good Life

...Hedonism, Desire Satisfaction, and a Good Life So, would you like to have a good life? I wouldn't. Well, actually I would in a sense. After all, for something to be 'good' is to be 'such as to fulfill the desires in question'. The desires in question, in this case, are my desires. To say that I do not desire a good life is to say that I do not desire a life that has those properties that I desire. However, a good life is not the only thing I want. I want a great many of things. I would like to have a good steak. A good steak is a steak is a steak that has those qualities that I desire in a steak regarding taste and size. However, I want a great many things and often find that i give up other things I would give up a good steak - I would give up the best possible steak - to fulfill sme of those other desires. I would be willing to give up a good life in exchange for some of the things that I value. That is, unless we define "a good life" to include everything that I value. In that case, giving up a good life would be impossible. What would I give it up for? It would have to be something I value more than life, but 'life' has been defined in a way that embraces all desires. We have the same problem with steaks by the way. The best of all possible steaks would be a steak that fulfilled the most possible of my desires. It would fulfill my desires with respect to taste, while leaving unthwarted my desires with respect to gaining weight. However, it would also......

Words: 1344 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

How Does Nihilism Affect Hedonism?

...How does Nihilism affect Hedonism? Farid Guzman BKvt.3 Hedonism and Nihilism are two incredibly interesting philosophies, especially when studied in contrast to each other. Although by the simplest definitions they are opposites, they actually have a lot in common. In fact, it s entirely possible for one to occur as a result of the other. Both are very common in modern Western society, although for the most part extreme hedonists or nihilists are almost unheard of. Even thought we don’t normally pay attention to it, we all have Nihilistic and Hedonistic tendencies at various times throughout our lives. Nihilism is the belief that nothing we do, own or believe is of any value. It is the belief that we are worthless and that life has no purpose. It comes across as a very dark, empty way of life, yet we all embrace it in small ways. For example, someone may deem voting worthless, arguing that their political choices won’t affect anything. This, on a small scale, is Nihilism. It's a common assumption that without religious moral codes people will behave in a dishonest, violent and otherwise anti-social manner. Yet, the most pious and devout believers still lie, cheat, steal and kill; an open non-believer could do no worse. And the dishonest and anti-social behavior of believers exploiting religious morality are all the more malevolent because they do it under the cover of “righteousness”. The fact is that religion, and the morality it attempts to conclude, is actually...

Words: 1590 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Campaigns and Elections

...3/12/14 A Defense of Hedonism Many objections have been made against the theory of axiological hedonism. I will not attempt to respond to all of them, but instead focus on one of the stronger arguments, which deals with life trajectories. I will begin by briefly presenting the theory of axiological hedonism and then present the objection regarding life trajectories to the best of my ability. Finally for the majority of my essay, I will argue for why this objection is unsound and does not prove that hedonism is false. Axiological hedonism is the philosophical theory that is based on the idea that the only thing in this world that is intrinsically good for its own sake is happiness. This is different from the theory of psychological hedonism, which says that the only thing humans are physically able to desire for its own sake is happiness. First developed by Epicurus and later revised by John Stuart Mill along with many others, the theory of axiological hedonism uses a distinction between what philosophers call instrumental goods and things that are intrinsically valuable to illustrate its claim. Instrumental goods are any things in the world that are valuable because of the good things they bring about. Things that are intrinsically valuable on the other hand, are things that are inherently good for their own sake. Axiological hedonism claims that happiness is the only thing that is intrinsically valuable. The argument for axiological hedonisms is roughly as follows: ...

Words: 1669 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

The Good Life

...Hedonism Vs. Desire Satisfaction Theory Living the “good life” to many that means having lots of money, nice cars and dating beautiful women. However, to philosophers it isn’t that easy, to them living the good life has to do with either the theory of hedonism or desire satisfaction. Hedonism simply means that the only intrinsic good is pleasure and the only intrinsic bad is pain. Desire satisfaction theory is the theory that life is well when our desires our filled and bad when they are not. Both hedonism and desire satisfaction theory have their strengths and weaknesses. Hedonism and desire satisfaction theory are both vague enough to have many different models of the “good life” and they both allow personal authority. Another strength is that hedonism follows common sense, as for the desire satisfaction theory, it avoids objective values therefore he values are always relative to oneself. Now it wouldn’t be philosophy if both these theories didn’t have arguments against them. Although they both sound simple and perfect they have their weaknesses. For hedonism the first argument that could be made against it is that pleasure isn’t the only good in the world. For example someone who is working out might not enjoy the pain during the workout but exercise is good for everyone. A second argument weakness would be that because hedonists don’t let bad news affect them they wouldn’t have motivation to get better because they don’t let bad news bother them. For DST one of...

Words: 525 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Explain the Difference Between Narrow and Preference Hedonism. Which Is a More Plausible Theory of Happiness?

...Explain the difference between narrow and preference hedonism. Which is a more plausible theory of happiness? 1. Introduction (250) Happiness belongs to Hedonism. If one experience more happiness during life, his life will be better. The more happiness you experience, the better your life is. There are actually two schools of thought here, Narrow Hedonism and Preference Hedonism, each with its own definition of happiness. Narrow Hedonism deems happiness a homogeneous state of pleasure, while Preference Hedonism expands the definition to include any state of mind favored by the individual, including pain (yes, pain is happiness, for some). However, the two schools are united in their focus on mental states, which as you will see is a silly idea. Hedonism is a way of life, characterised by openness to pleasurable experience. There are many qualms about hedonism. It is rejected on moral grounds and said to be detrimental to long-term happiness. Several mechanisms for this 'paradox of hedonism' have been suggested and telling examples of pleasure seekers ending up in despair have been given. The relation between hedonism and happiness has been studied at two levels: that of the nation and the individual. At the national level average happiness is correlated with moral acceptance of pleasure and with active leisure. At the individual level it is similarly linked with hedonistic attitudes and also correlated with hedonistic behaviours such as frequent sex and use of......

Words: 2995 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Super Size Me

...ethical theories: Hedonism, the Desire Theory, and Ethical Egoism. Hedonism: The Pleasure of the Super Size As Rabinowicz and Ronnow-Rasmussen (2005) explains, “an object is thought to be intrinsically valuable … depends on … final value if it is valuable ‘as an end’, ‘for its own sake’, rather than for the sake of something else” (p. 115). The kind of pleasure hedonists claim is always intrinsically valuable is health. If people know that they are healthy and are free of sickness or pain, they are living a good life, and a good life is a happy life. Basically, health contributes to happiness and the happier the person is, the better his/her life is going to be. According to Veenhoven (2003), “There is a longstanding discussion about the merits of this hedonism. Some praise it as natural and healthy” (p. 437). So, if one is not healthy or is feeling sick, then he/she is not happy; it is what hedonists say that misery takes away a good life. In the film, going into the seventh day of eating only McDonalds, Spurlock (2004) says, “I’ve started to have – not chest pains … I got pressure on my chest. I figure that’s probably not a good thing.” Then on the ninth day, he said, “I don’t feel good today. Not that I feel sick, but I just feel really depressed” (Spurlock, 2004). Surely, this rejects Hedonism. However, people can say that “hedonists provide each of us a substantial say in what the good life looks like” (Landau, 2012, p. 24). In it, hedonism does not allow......

Words: 1462 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Need Help

...Happiness belongs to Hedonism. If one experience more happiness during life, his life will be better. The more happiness you experience, the better your life is. There are actually two schools of thought here, Narrow Hedonism and Preference Hedonism, each with its own definition of happiness. Narrow Hedonism deems happiness a homogeneous state of pleasure, while Preference Hedonism expands the definition to include any state of mind favored by the individual, including pain (yes, pain is happiness, for some). However, the two schools are united in their focus on mental states, which as you will see is a silly idea. Hedonism is a way of life, characterised by openness to pleasurable experience. There are many qualms about hedonism. It is rejected on moral grounds and said to be detrimental to long-term happiness. Several mechanisms for this 'paradox of hedonism' have been suggested and telling examples of pleasure seekers ending up in despair have been given. The relation between hedonism and happiness has been studied at two levels: that of the nation and the individual. At the national level average happiness is correlated with moral acceptance of pleasure and with active leisure. At the individual level it is similarly linked with hedonistic attitudes and also correlated with hedonistic behaviours such as frequent sex and use of stimulants. In this essay, it will firstly discuss what is hedonism, including the two catories Narrow hedonism and Preference hedonism.......

Words: 270 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ethics

...from the 18th century. Bentham’s based his ethical system on the notion that pleasure was far better that physical pain. Bentham utilitarianism appears to be related with hedonism, since he considered moral actions that maximized with pleasure and minimized pain. During the 19th century John Stuart Mills another utilitarian philosopher further advanced the development of this philosophy; however, breaking away from hedonism. For Mill, pleasure or happiness should be calculated by measuring the greater good of people. He also recognized that certain pleasures were superior to others. It important to understand the utilitarianism change the way of thinking. Meanwhile, religious morals are based on rules and divine revelation as the way of thinking, while utilitarianism is the opposite. Utilitarianism outstanding traits are it relatively simple. To understand if an action is moral, there is no need estimate if the consequences are positive or negative. When the good outdoes the bad, it can be considered that the actions are moral. In essence Bentham and Mills were both utilitarian; however each follow a dissimilar type of utilitarianism. Their difference was fairly evident in the information provided above. Because the views of ethical humane hedonism in opposition to psychological self-centered hedonism and the relevance of the principle of utility. Deontological Ethics The 18th Century German Philosopher Immanuel Kant, stated that deontology was an......

Words: 675 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Sci 362 Wk 1 Terms and Definitions Wksht

...change as cultural, political, economic, and social significances change. Ethics assist in determining forms of conduct that are morally acceptable or unacceptable as well as play a role in human activities that invole intelligent judgement and voluntary actions. When there are conflicting values, ethics help to distinguish which value is more important or better than the other values. Reference Raven, P., Berg, L., & Hassenzahl, D. (2010). Environment. (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. | Hedonism | Hedonism is the ethical theory that defines pleasure and the sense of satisfaction of desires is the proper aim of human life. Hedonism defines theories that state wha tis good for mankind, how mankind should behave, and what motivation mankind has to behave in the manner in which they do. All theories in Hedonism relate pleasure and pain as the only important elements of whatever occurrences they are used to describe. Reference Weijers, D. (2011). Hedonism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand | Holism | Holism is the theory that all entities in nature and in the universe operate together as a whole rather than as separate components. The belief of holism is that one must review how components of natural systems work together, rather than as individual parts, to understand nature and its abilities. In medical terms holism refers to treating the whole body rather than just the issue.......

Words: 2048 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

The Value System

...The value systems are legalism, situational ethics, hedonism, asceticism, utilitarianism, and rationalism. Legalism is considered persons moral laws that come from external sources. It is a code of ethics, moral code, and beliefs of what’s right or wrong from ones religion. Situational ethics is the belief of having genuine love for one another and not moral rules. There are no strict rules of ethics; the rules depend on the situation. If a situation is better to break a rule than follow it then it gets broken, whatever’s best for the situation. The ethical relativism is believed with no moral ethics or rules and what’s best for the situation. The belief is there are no one set of morals better than another. The hedonism is guided by pleasure and not morals. This ethic is doing what feels right with no moral thoughts considered. Asceticism is the belief that to totally devote themselves to their spiritual pursuits they do not have sex at all and do not need any material items. Utilitarianism is guidelines that are based not just on religion but what action will benefit the most people. It’s not just based on religion but also principles that are not religious. Rationalism believes that decisions should be thought through intellectually and reasoned before made. Better decisions are believed to be made when thinking what’s best without including emotions in the decisions. The consequences are also taken into consideration before a decision is made. The value......

Words: 357 - Pages: 2