Free Software Movement

In: Social Issues

Submitted By whisp
Words 596
Pages 3
A computer programmer named Richard Stallman started the Free Software Movement in the mid 1980’s; Stallman was an avid participant and part of the underground computer hacking and programming culture at MIT during the late 1970’s and early 1980’s. When the hacker culture began to break up and move on to building software for the first personal computers many people who once worked together so closely began to hide the source code they were writing and started to copyright and put exclusive licenses and usage agreements in an effort to limit the copying, altering, and redistribution of the software. To combat this growing trend and Stallman started the GNU Project, which was a collection of free software that could be modified and changed to the users preferences and needs. Stallman’s initial goal was to “Put together a sufficient body of free software so that it will be able to “get along” software that is free. “
Currently the majority of software that is released into the consumer market is considered proprietary software, this means that the coding that runs the software is copywrighiten and cannot be changed, studied, or redistributed in any form. The main stand that Stallman and the Free Software Movement (FSM) take against this concept is they believe that once the software is purchased the end user should be able to change and modify the software as they wish, similar to the way in which after purchasing a car you are able to modify the car as you wish albeit possible voiding your warranty. The FSM believes that the coding of the software should be open source where it can be used studied and modified without restriction, they claim that the companies that have proprietary restrictions on their software are actually undermining the potential of the software. They also say that the companies would not see much a difference in their profits because the number…...

Similar Documents


...countries across the globe are harnessing the power of online platforms to physically care for the future of the planet,” said Andy Ridley . BREAST CANCER AWARENESS CAMPAIGN GETS SOCIAL Early 2010, I and got a message in my inbox “Write the color of your bra as your status -- just the color, nothing else” from a friend of mine. I can’t remember what color I chose then, but at that time, there were so many “color” statuses on Facebook. To us, it was a fun game; we couldn’t imagine that this “trend”, later on, made big headlines not only in asia country but also on Time, Washington post, CNN, BBC etc and.. No one knew who was the one who created this viral, but spokeswoman for Facebook, at that time said “this is an example of a grass-roots movement beginning on the social networking site.” (Sarah Aarthun, 2010). This “social media” root campaign not only helped to make big headline on leading newspapers and magazines, but also created “talk in town” or “work of mouth” about the campaign. In general, it helped spread the word and drew public attention powerfully to breast cancer. SOCIAL MEDIA CAN CAUSE CRISIS-THE SUSAN G KOMEN CASE. I am rephrasing the situation of how social media makes it harder for a organization to manage its reputation as reported by New York Times, Huffington post, Washington Post etc. below: Earlier summer 2012,the Susan G. Komen foundation for the cure (a organization which aims to fight against breast cancer)decided to stopped......

Words: 1571 - Pages: 7


...athletes, or movie stars wearing. Fashion changes quickly and it indirectly reflects the rapid pace of change in pop culture. Right now seems as if the 80’s are making a comeback. Teen boys are wearing skinny jeans and tight shirts. Today’s girls are wearing tight pants, leggings, big ear rings, and wedge hills. The standard that women should be beautiful and sexy are present throughout these images. Girls are starting young, dressing up like grown women. Fashion shapes who people are and how people live. Not purposely, but fashion indirectly creates cliques. Pop culture has been a movement that has been consistently evolving since its beginning. The culture remains the same; but trends, fashions, and styles are on a continuous loop. When it comes to my position on pop culture, my stance varies. Mainly, because I do not favor the hardcore lyric content in rap and other music but I am a strong proponent free speech and creativity. I also believe that it is the parent’s responsibility to appropriately monitor what’s going on in their children’s lives. Parents need to explain to their children the difference between reality and entertainment. Study They Say I Say Steven Johnson,......

Words: 1198 - Pages: 5

Chapter 10 Software in Flux: Partly Cloudy and Sometimes Free

...Chapter 10 Software in Flux: Partly Cloudy and Sometimes Free Cloud computing Cloud-computing is about replacing computing resources—either an organization’s or an individual’s hardware or software—with services provided over the Internet. Benefits for clients firm and software vendor Cloud computing has low barrier of entry and the expenses are variable which can fit either big organizations or small companies. The client firm can rent what they need and no need to buy the equipment that they may not use every day. This can reduce their cost and increase their efficiency on other places. The software vendor has more reliability than companies that have their own IT team. The vendor can provide all time technical support and they also have more experiences to support the infrastructure. For a new company, they do not have enough security system and knowledge about it. The vendor can provides these hardware and knowledge for new companies. Risks for clients firm and software vendor If there is a internet outage, no one can reach their data in the software vendor. It could cause delay or lost data for companies. If companies have sensitive information, they would rather store these information in their own IT services. The clouding computing is depend on internet which the information can hacked or intercept by people if they are skilled enough. Open Source Software(OSS) Open Source Software is that free and anyone can look at and potentially......

Words: 375 - Pages: 2

Evaluation of Bitdefender & Avast! Free Antivirus Software

...usually look for when that person visits This allows Amazon to offer the individual specific items, or bundles of items, based upon preferences demonstrated through purchases or items visited earlier that day or earlier that month or year.( SWOT Analysis Amazon) This is a great strategy and it works I know this because i visit Amazon daily and every time I go back to the website they recommend items that are similar to items I have recently purchased or items that I recently looked at. As far as Amazon goes and what they need to do better to top their competitors in my mind is nothing because from what I can see they pander to their audience which is the customers and they are doing a fine job at the with low prices and free shipping. References: Marketing Strategies of (n.d.). Marketing Plan RSS. Retrieved from SWOT Analysis Amazon. (n.d.). Amazon SWOT. Retrieved from

Words: 590 - Pages: 3

Software Piracy

...songs, videos and games, and the software industry which is the copying of software licences. For the purpose of this paper, we will be discussing the implications of software piracy, its effects on everyday businesses, and also briefly cover the effects on the industry itself. We will apply the theoretical framework and specify what this issue means to business managers in a practical setting. History Software Piracy originated in the 1960’s when the CD-RW drive was invented and floppy disks were traded. Since that time, the industry has grown significantly, especially in developing countries, resulting in billions of dollars of lost economic benefits and tax revenue. Prior to the 1980’s, one could pirate software without any legal implications. However, in the late 1970’s, Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, lobbied for legislation to protect the integrity of software. When an individual or organization purchases software, it is the license to use the software that is purchased, not the software itself. As a result, Software Piracy is now an illegal act in most countries. One of the main advantages of Software Piracy is cost: the software is free or almost free to obtain. In addition, the software is easy to obtain, most often through the internet. However, pirating software brings with it many disadvantages; the main disadvantage being the activity is an illegal offense. Not only is pirating software illegal, quite often the software is not clean of viruses......

Words: 1911 - Pages: 8

Free Movement of Person

...45 TFEU. Following the case of C-196/87 Steymann, the term “remuneration” was not restricted to wages, it can also include pocket money or foods. Hence, by taking into account all the circumstances, it is likely that Arturo would consider as a worker under Art 45 TFEU. As a worker, Arturo would able to rely on Art 20 TFEU, arguing that he would have the right to reside in UK for the purpose of his employment (Art 45 (3)(c)TFEU), and also the right to remain in the territory after being employed in that States [Art 45(3)(d) TFEU]. Moreover, Arturo would have the right to reside in UK for a period longer than three months, since he himself was a worker, and the right was protected under Art 7(1)(a) Directive 2004/38. The right to free movement of workers, as interpreted by the Court of Justice, is an extensive right. Unless the UK government able to satisfy the three derogation grounds under Art 45(3) TFEU, namely public health, public policy and public security, any order which required Arturo to leave UK would be an infringement of Arturo’s right to reside. On the fact, the UK government used the ground of public health, the skin disease as a reason to deport Arturo. By virtue of Directive 64/221, diseases such as syphilis and tuberculosis (but did not include HIV/AIDS) and conditions which may affect public security or public policy such as drug addiction or severe mental disturbance would justify the refusal of entry but Arturo’s condition seem unlikely would be fall...

Words: 1608 - Pages: 7

Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman

...Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman Introduction by Lawrence Lessig Edited by Joshua Gay GNU Press Free Software Foundation Boston, MA USA First printing, first edition. Copyright © 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ISBN 1-882114-98-1 Published by the Free Software Foundation 59 Temple Place Boston, MA Tel: 1-617-542-5942 Fax: 1-617-542-2652 Email: Web: GNU Press is an imprint of the FSF. Email: Web: Please contact the GNU Press for information regarding bulk purchases for classroom or user group use, reselling, or any other questions or comments. Original artwork by Etienne Suvasa. Cover design by Jonathan Richard. Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this book provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved on all copies. Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this book into another language, from the original English, with respect to the conditions on distribution of modified versions above, provided that it has been approved by the Free Software Foundation. i Short Contents Editor’s Note . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A Note on Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Topic Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

Words: 101866 - Pages: 408

Free and Open-Source Software

...Research Paper: Free and Open-Source Software NT1430 – Linux Networking Research Paper: Free and Open-Source Software As the name so aptly implies FOSS is software that is both free and open source.  It is liberally licensed to grant users the right to use, copy, study, change, and improve its design through the availability of its source code. This practice is becoming increasingly widespread and gaining acceptance because of the potential benefits that could arise from its use. The “free” part of the title refers not to price, but more so to the idea of freedom for the user. The user of this type of software has the ability to copy and to reuse the software which usually is not the case. The open source part of the acronym refers to the use of the peer to peer model of development. In the 1950’s to 1970’s, advanced user privelages in reference to software were the norm. Most software allowed the user to share and copy at this time, since most of the companies who dealt in the field were more focused on marketing the hardware the software was almost always complimentary. This however, began to change when software development costs began to escalate and companies began competing for the software market. Linus Torvalds, the creator of the Linux kernel began to shift things back in 1991. His software was a freely modifiable source code. Over the years the idea gathered much more momentum. It has burgheoned so that now major IT companies are now developing projects...

Words: 343 - Pages: 2


...Principle of Software Engineering Table of Contents Abstract 3 Introduction 4 Boehm's First Law 4 Boehm's Second law 5 Conway's law 5 Parnas Law 6 Corbató Law 7 Observation 8 Theory 9 Law 9 Question 3 10 Law 11 References 12 Abstract The purpose of the study is to show the capability to understand the set of laws that are the part of principles of the software engineering. In this paper, it is discussed that there are many laws related to the software engineering but only few of them are to be addressed. Boehm first and second law, Conway’s laws, Parnas laws & Corbato law were discussed with examples. There are two relationship processes that are also discussed, related to the software Engineering. Law method and tools which are depended on each other and they are performing the task with the help of principle and process by following the rules. Same scenario is followed in other relation too, where observation, law and theory are depended on each other. Observation is repeatable to law and law is explained by theory. Theory should be confirmed by the law and it predict by the observation before further proceeding. Introduction Question No 1 Boehm's First Law Errors are more regular in the middle of fundamentals and configuration exercises and are more abundant when they are displaced. In this law, some basic configuration errors do outnumber code blunders. However, cost stays......

Words: 1641 - Pages: 7

Free Will

...As regards the human person, the genes that predispose an individual’s temperament interact with their personal experiences to mold their individuality. A person’s individuality encapsulates both their internal and external reactions, as every human possesses a solitary, distinctive mind that constitutes their self-identity. A person’s actions cannot be solely attributed to the interaction between genes and experience, however, because within every person there also lies a will— a will that is free to make decisions and perform the actions it so desires. As was established previously, “inherited temperament deals the cards of life, and the human person—body and soul with innate, adventitious, and fictitious ideas— plays the hand they are dealt as new objects, experiences, and relationships are thrown their way.” In other words: nature, the innate qualities a person is born with due to their genetic make-up, interacts with nurture, the personal experiences a person comes into contact with. This was earlier explained using the empirical concept behind psychology’s diathesis-stress models, which examine how an individual’s level of vulnerability to abnormal behavior or mental illness (the diathesis) interacts with environmental factors (the stress) to influence behavior and the development of mental disorders. Similarly, a person’s genetic distinctions (the diathesis) interact with environmental factors and events (the stress) to influence their own thoughts, desires, and......

Words: 1081 - Pages: 5

Free Will

...Critically consider arguments for free-will in psychology (30 marks) One argument for free-will comes from the psychological argument, which suggests that people have a subjective sense of free-will and all people are able to make their own free choices about their behaviour. Evidence for this comes from Dr. Johnson in the 18th Century who sustained the idea that ‘we know our will is free, and there’s an end on ‘t’. (A01) However, a counterargument towards the psychological argument is that simply feeling that you are free does not mean that this is true. Skinner claimed that free will was an illusion – we think we are free, but this is because we are not aware of how our behaviour is determined by reinforcement. Freud also thought that free will was an illusion, because he felt that the causes of our behaviour is unconscious and therefore still predictable. (A02 ) In contrast, Valentine (1982) claims that this subjective sense of free will is tenable (reasonable). It is something that can be studied and thus shown to be true, e.g., attitudes towards free will have been found to increase with age and are also more common in individualistic cultures such as the USA and UK where personal responsibility receives greater emphasis. (A02 ) Another argument for free will in psychology derives from the ethical argument. This states that if an individual’s behaviour is determined by forces beyond their control, then the individual cannot be held responsible for......

Words: 1223 - Pages: 5

Open-Source Movement and the Future

...OPEN-SOURCE MOVEMENT AND THE FUTURE ITSU1003 INTRODUCTION TO OPEN-SOURCE Generally computer software sources (the human readable version of the software) are of two kinds; closed and open. Open-source programming has been prominently growing in the past ten years. In this model, programmers share their codes freely in order to be modified and used by others. They are allowed to alter and change the original software as much as they like. This in turn will produce higher quality software with improved features. For the open-source programs to be reliable, some sort of licenses has been approved by Open Source Initiative (OSI) which is a “non-profit corporation dedicated to managing and promoting the open-source definition for the good of the community, especially through the OSI Certified Open-source software certification mark and program.” HISTORY OF OPEN-SOURCE Open-source began to form in the hacker’s society of the United States computer science laboratories such as Stanford and MIT in the late 1960’s. Programmers were members of societies in which each member was expected to share his or her code among the society members. This would apply improvements on different codes by members of the society. In addition, programmers were able to use each other’s knowledge in their own interest mutually. By the early 1980’s the university hacker societies began to collapse, and the hackers were hired by commercial companies producing proprietary systems (systems that required...

Words: 1851 - Pages: 8

Free and Open Source Software (Foss)

...IT 320 Research Paper 2 Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) has been a pinnacle of the corporate world ever since it came around. It has been an easy to use and replicate without worry of patent or licensing infringement. However, in 2006 Microsoft found that many of their patents had been infringed upon by several different aspects. The Linux kernel found in most servers was one of them. Microsoft took a big leap going after FOSS for 235 patents. FOSS is run by Stallman who was responsible for the GNU Manifesto also known to most as the GNU General Public License (GPL) . With Microsoft heading the full speed train against FOSS it took a demanding tire on both parties. While Microsoft, in the mean time was also striking a deal with Novell on its Linux based server support. FOSS was sure to go under as Linux was the base of all its open source used in many applications and the applications within Linux such as samaba or Open Office. The Deal with Novell was made to walk around the GPL of the GNU and expose loop holes for Microsoft’s gain but also creating a pressing dilemma for the GNU. The deal struck between Novell and Microsoft was a “we don’t sue you and you don’t sue us” which indicates that not only was FOSS involved in patent infringement but also Microsoft. The Deal included over 200 million dollars to Novell and 43 Million to Microsoft for “license distribution” of Novells’ Server software. The after effects of this deal resulted in a......

Words: 419 - Pages: 2


...Hardware and Software Designers are rarely free to do whatever comes to mind. Just as designers consider their users’ needs for specific information, they must also consider any constraints imposed on them by their users’ hardware, software, and speed of connection to the Internet. Today, a single operating system (Microsoft’s XP) dominates personal computer market. Similarly, only two Web site browsers are favored by the vast majority of users. More than ninety percent of users have their monitors set to 1024x768, 800x600 or 1280x1024 pixel resolution. And while most users at work have high-speed Internet access, many home users still connect using dial-up. Within the constraints of available time, money, and resources, it is usually impossible to design for all users. Therefore, identify the hardware and software used by your primary and secondary audiences and design to maximize the effectiveness of your Web site. 4 Hardware and Software R e s e a r c h - B a s e d We b D e s i g n & U s a b i l i t y G u i d e l i n e s 30 4:1 Design for Common Browsers Guideline: Design, develop and test for the most common browsers. Relative Importance: Strength of Evidence: Hardware and Software Comments: Designers should attempt to accommodate ninety-five percent of all users. Ensure that all testing of a Web site is done using the most popular browsers. Sources of information about the most commonly used browsers: •

Words: 964 - Pages: 4

Selling Free Software

...Selling Free Software Some views on the ideas of selling exceptions to free software licenses, such as the GNU GPL are also available. Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that you should charge as little as possible — just enough to cover the cost. This is a misunderstanding. Actually, we encourage people who redistribute free software to charge as much as they wish or can. If this seems surprising to you, please read on. The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer either to freedom or to price. When we speak of “free software”, we're talking about freedom, not price. (Think of “free speech”, not “free beer”.) Specifically, it means that a user is free to run the program, change the program, and redistribute the program with or without changes. Free programs are sometimes distributed gratis, and sometimes for a substantial price. Often the same program is available in both ways from different places. The program is free regardless of the price, because users have freedom in using it. Nonfree programs are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you a copy at no charge. That doesn't make it free software, though. Price or no price, the program is nonfree because users don't have freedom. Since free software is not a matter of price, a low price doesn't make the software free, or even closer to free. So if you are redistributing......

Words: 1120 - Pages: 5