Ford Motor Company : Supply Chain Strategy

In: Business and Management

Submitted By woodsceleste
Words 3143
Pages 13
Ford Motor Company: Supply Chain Strategy

Attn: Jac Nasser, CEO

Dear Mr. Nasser

Please find attached the report as requested

Yours Truly,

Teri Takai

Ford Motor Company: Supply Chain Strategy
-------------------------------------------------
Case Study Response
Executive Summary
As Director of Supply Chain Systems and decision maker on if we should proceed with the Virtual Integration Model I have carefully analysed all aspects of this model to see if it could work within Ford and the Automobile industry. We have a rich history of success and working through difficult challenges and I have no doubt that we will do so again with the right decision on this model.
The Automobile industry is a complex one with many suppliers, parts, dealerships, competitors and all this is now happening in a global market. This complexity makes efficiencies difficult to implement and drives up the costs our supply chain. Many efficiencies would require the cooperation of both internal and external parties and would require significant investment. Ford’s main problem with their current system is the inefficient usage of their huge data base, the complex network of suppliers, the presence of many independent distributors who are making forecasting difficult and the lack of direct communication with customers.
Through my review I have come to the conclusion that the full implementation of the Dell Model would not work; the way customers buy cars and computers in this day and age is to different. With the high value of a vehicle customers want to test out the product and therefore we will need to maintain the dealerships but I do believe aspects of this model need to be implemented to lead to major cost savings with Fords Supply Chain. In this report I have laid out the items we should implement, a time line and the metrics for review.
Ford Motor Company: Supply…...

Similar Documents

Ford Motor Company

...Company Background and History In 1995, to reduce cost and increase efficiency, Ford 2000 was developed to reengineer company processes including Order to Delivery (OTD) and Ford Production System (FPS) with a primary strategic goal of decreasing OTD from 60+ days to less than 15. A company-wide Intranet was launched in 1996 and expanded to include business-to-business (B2B) capacity by January 1997 including the Automotive Network Exchange (ANX) and the public Internet site went live in 1995. By 1997, the Internet site had more than 1 million hits per day. Ford was honoured as most improved automaker in the 1997 JD Power Initial Quality Study and by 1998 it acquired Volvo and surpassed Chrysler in profit per vehicle ($1770) while total profit hit $6.9 billion. Ford Motor Company is the second largest industrial corporation in the world operating in 200 countries around the globe with 180 manufacturing plants. Issues Teri Takai, Director of Supply Chain Systems is contemplating recommendations on information technologies (e.g., Internet technologies) from new high-tech industries could alter how Ford interacts with suppliers. • One group favoring "virtual integration" like Dell. • Another group believes differences between the auto business and computer manufacturing is substantive. Relative to Dell, Ford’s supplier network has more layers and companies, and Ford’s purchasing organization was more prominent and independent than Dell's....

Words: 2364 - Pages: 10

Ford Motor Company

...Ford Motor Company Billie Warren OMM 692: Organizational Management Strategy Adrienne Osborne January 14, 2013 Executive Summary- Ford Motor Company (Ford) has been a leader in the auto industry, however, over the past few decades has continued to lose market share to foreign competition. The current weak United States economy combined with rising fuel prices and increased political pressures regarding global warming, presents several challenges to Ford and the entire auto industry. These current challenges provide exciting opportunities for the auto company who must reduce cost, get fresh capital, and quickly develop and produce, new efficient, economic autos, and alternative fuelled vehicles. The global auto industry will continue to grow with 80% of the global auto industry’s growth from now until 2014 is expected to come from emerging markets. However, for Ford to succeed they will need to address several internal issues regarding legacy costs, unions in the United States, and the development of a wide range of new vehicles that consumers consider the new “must have” vehicles instead of the large trucks and SUVs (Scribd.com). Looking to the future Ford will have a global presence in these critical emerging markets like China and India, and have the knowledge and expertise in efficient and alternative vehicle technologies required to move the company forward. For Ford to achieve the vision of being synonymous with alternative vehicles...

Words: 3002 - Pages: 13

Ford Motor Company

... Smith 1 Background Ford Motor Company is one among three of the largest auto manufacturers in the United States. The “Big Three,” as they are referred to are General Motors (GM), Ford, and Chrysler. Since the 1970’s the “Big Three”, felt encroached upon by foreign-based auto manufacturers. Ford created a Worldwide Web Organization (WWWO) in May 1996 as an internal resource of web technologies. July 4, 1997, Mike Ledford, Director of Process Reengineering released a progress report of internal use of web technologies and future web use policies as the second anniversary of the release of the company’s public web site (1). Since the inception of Ford’s WWWO, their web group grew to approximately 80, supporting an internal user base of more than 80,000 and eventually greater than 120,000. Ford’s “Web Farm” supported over 300 departments with an augment rate of about one per day. Ford had Ninety-two web applications with an average project life cycle of eight weeks (1). “Ford was in the business of designing, building, selling and servicing automobiles.” Additionally web technologies were viewed as a contributor of significant value to Ford’s core business. Ford had a financial services subsidiary that acquired significant revenues and profits, but their core business was the design and manufacturing of automobiles for the consumer market. While web technologies contributed greatly to Fords success, maintaining focus was imperative. Ford Motor Company based in Dearborn,......

Words: 2878 - Pages: 12

Ford Motor Company: Supply Chain Strategy

...As director of Supply Chain Systems, Teri Takai recommends implementing virtual integration strategies from companies like Dell to portions of Ford’s supply chain strategy. Although there are several key differences between the companies, the restructuring plans of Ford 2000 have set a viable foundation to implement Dell’s virtual integration strategy in inventory management, customer service and support and suppliers’ management. The redesign of the process must include design not only of the supply chain but also of fulfillment, forecasting, purchasing, and a variety of other functions that historically been considered independently within the Ford hierarchy. Teri believes that implementing virtual integration by building on Ford’s key initiatives and projects including Ford Production Systems (FPS), Order to Delivery (OTD) and Ford Retail Network (FRN) that are currently underway will make their supply chain run more smoothly with less bottlenecking, reduced inventory, and better overall performance. Managers could overcome the complex and inaccurate manual process of forecasting and procuring parts which would result in reduced OTD lessen costs and enhance customer satisfaction. Further improved Supply Chain management will improve Supply Chain responsiveness and increase shareholder value to keep investors interested in the company. ------------------------------------------------- Introduction Due to increase in market competition, supply chain superiority......

Words: 3074 - Pages: 13

Pricing Strategy Ford Motor Company

...like Ford Motor, because price is related to Ford's income, cost, revenue, employee benefit and etc. Price is the only one element of the marketing mix that produces revenue; the other elements produce costs. Ford Motor must understand making a proper pricing strategy is very important. The relationship between price and demand is the higher the price, the lower the demand. As we all known, automotive market is price sensitivity, because automotive is expensive for most customer, customers are less price sensitive to low-cost items. The higher the elasticity, the greater the volume growth resulting from a 1 percent price reduction. If demand is elastic, sellers will consider lowering the price. A lower price will produce ,ore total revenue. Throughout most of history, prices were set by negotiation between buyers and sellers. But in 21 centre there are many types of pricing strategies that can be used for a certain product or service. First is 'premium pricing' that uses high price and uniqueness within a product or service. Second is 'penetration pricing' wherein prices are artificially low in order to gain market share. Third is 'economy pricing' wherein the cost of marketing and manufacturing are both kept low. Fourth is 'price skimming' wherein there is high price for a substantial competitive advantage. Fifth is 'optional product pricing' wherein the initial goal is to increase customer through optional extras. Sixth is 'captive product pricing' wherein companies......

Words: 311 - Pages: 2

Ford Motor Company Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Map

...***************************************************************** Instructor's Grade on Assignment: Instructor's Comments: Ford Motor Company Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Map Contents Executive Summary: 3 Background: 4 Financial Strategy: 7 Customer Strategy: 8 Internal Processes Strategy: 9 Learning and Growth Strategy: 10 Conclusion: 11 References 12 Ford Motor Company Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Map Executive Summary: Ford Motor Company was incorporated June 16, 1903 by Mr. Henry Ford with only $28,000 in capital. Ford Motor Company drew quick success and gained a clear advantage over future competitors with the ability to produce an affordable, efficient and reliable automobile for everyone (scope). In pursuit of efficiency and lowering costs, Ford in 1913 introduced the moving assembly line into his plants, a revolutionary idea that would change the automobile industry because of its ability to increase its production. Two other American made automobile manufactures’, known as, Chrysler and General Motors moved into Ford’s Detroit neighborhood wanting to share the profits of this new innovation. Together, they would be called Detroit’s “Big Three” and all three equally responsible for the industrialization and progression of Detroit, Michigan. Two different business measurements involving the Balanced Scorecard and the Strategy Map were used to determine Ford Motor Company’s scope, advantage and value proposition. The Balance......

Words: 2079 - Pages: 9

Supply Chain Strategy - Case Study --Ford Motor Company

...Company and Industry background The Ford Motor Company (Ford) is an American multinational automaker headquartered in Dearborn, Michigan. It was founded by Henry Ford and incorporated on June 16, 1903. The company sells automobiles and commercial vehicles under the Ford brand and most luxury cars under the Lincoln brand. Also Ford owns Brazilian SUV manufacturer Troller, and Australian performance car manufacturer FPV. Ford has stakes in Mazda of Japan, Aston Martin of the United Kingdom, and Jiangling of China. Ford also has a number of joint-ventures in China, Thailand, Turkey and Russia. Ford's former UK subsidiaries Jaguar and Land Rover were sold to Tata Motors. Ford also owned the Swedish automaker Volvo for a period of time. Ford discontinued the Mercury brand, under which it had marketed entry-level luxury cars in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and the Middle. Ford is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and is controlled by the Ford family. It is described by Forbes as "the most important industrial company in the history of the United States. Ford introduced methods for large-scale manufacturing of cars and large-scale management of an industrial workforce using elaborately engineered manufacturing sequences typified by moving assembly lines; by 1914 these methods were known around the world as Fordism. In 1985 Ford had embarked on an ambitious restructuring plan called Ford 2000, which included merging its North American, European and international......

Words: 2635 - Pages: 11

Ford Motor Company – Supply Chain Strategy

...Executive Summary Ford’s existing supply chain is highly complex and there are several external factors that have contributed to the search for solutions to move past the costly supply chain challenges the company has been dealing with in recent years. The challenge in their current supply chain system revolves around the inefficient management of their large data base of suppliers, the existence of independent distributors and their inability to communicate and provide direct service to their customer base. Recognizing an immediate need to improve and enhance their supply chain, making it more cost effective and profitable, I have decided to implement portions of the supply chain strategy “Virtual Integration” from companies such as Dell. Although there are several main differences between the two companies which is visible in the comparison, pieces of Dell’s virtual integration strategy can be applied to Ford’s supply chain to improve operations. Through this solution, Ford will implement information technologies and internet, along with innovative concepts from high tech businesses, in order to directly interact and perform transactions with their suppliers and customers. This solution will allow Ford to increase its sales by gaining customer satisfaction and by providing rapid communication with their suppliers, manufacturers, and customers – but also keep current client that enjoy buying from dealerships. Since Dell and Ford are two different types of industries, a......

Words: 1723 - Pages: 7

Ford Motor Company

...Executive Summary Upon studying Ford’s existing supply chain it is not hard to see the high level of complexity within. This level of complexity blended with other internal and external factors have made Ford realize they need to explore solutions to deal with the supply chain challenges leading to cost and the reality they are facing and may continue to face in the future. The majority of issues in Ford’s present chain result from inefficient control of their large supplier base and the complexity of their supplier network in addition to inability to communicate to server their end customers. Ford has realized the urgent need to change their supply chain in order to be more cost effective and more profitable for its shareholders. Since Dell and Ford are two different types of markets, one is in the computer manufacturing/distribution business and the other is in the automobile business, it does not seem right for Ford to implement the exact “virtual integration model” deployed by Dell. The fact the car buyer usually wants to touch and feel the car before they make a purchase of a car would put Ford at risk of losing their customers to the competitors. On the other hand when customers buy computers on-line they don’t have to worry about touching and testing the computers and they require a better price than the other retail avenues to buy computers. Some other considerations in this case are the consideration of the buying frequency of cars versus computers and......

Words: 2308 - Pages: 10

Ford Motor Company

...Case Study for Ford Motor Company Supply Chain Strategy Prepared by Student: Prepared for Instructor: This report is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the course Table of Content Subject Page Executive Summary ............................................................................... 2 Issue Identification -.......................................................................................... 3 Environmental And Root Cause Analysis.............................................. 3 Alternative And Options......................................................................... 5 Recommendation And Implementation.................................................. 6 Monitor And Control.............................................................................. 6 Reference ................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary This paper evaluates and discusses the Ford 2000 project to reorganize its international operations in America, Europe, Asia and other locations for cost reduction. Following the evaluation, this writer finds that to implement and to proceed with Ford 2000 project and implement the information technology. As Ford will reduce the delivery time to 15 days and have direct relationship with supplier Tier 1, we will cut the cost. However Ford Motor Company is one of the......

Words: 1098 - Pages: 5

Ford Motor Company: Supply Chain Strategy

...Ford Motor Company: Supply Chain Strategy Executive Summary The Ford Motor Company is a well established, international automotive design and production company that is shifting the company mission to have an emphasis on shareholder value and customer responsiveness. In the face of increasing international competition, Ford has recognized several facets of operations that can be better executed in order to attain the outlined objectives. There has been several alternatives to various operations within Ford that can directly alter the fundamentals of its business, all with a strategic significance put on the supply chain procedures. This case study identifies these options; maintaining current practices and partnerships, standardization of their supply chain and sub-system products to simplify the supply process, adjust the retail services and dealership chains to drive market driven sales and a combination of virtual integration with key suppliers to drive relationship based supply that is determined by a forecast driven sales and production model, called the Ford 2000 Process. Through the evaluation of the presented alternatives, the Ford 2000 Process has been selected as being the most effective path to achieve the corporate goals of the Ford Motor Company. Ford should be able to utilize it’s current market share and global supply network to generate beneficial partnerships on key suppliers and stabilize a fluctuating production model that is riddled with......

Words: 2512 - Pages: 11

Ford Motor Company Supply Chain Strategy

...History Since the Ford Motor Company’s incorporation by Henry Ford in 1903, its strategic focus has remained on automobile design and manufacturing. Up until 1970, competition was from the two other manufacturers making up the Big Three Automakers; General Motors and Chrysler. However, starting in the 1970’s, foreign competition, mostly from Toyota and Honda, eventually lead to overcapacity within the industry. As more and more developing and industrial nations encouraged development into the automobile industry, overcapacity in the automobile markets reached an estimated 20 million vehicles. In 1995, in an effort to reduce cost and increase efficiency, Ford developed a restructuring plan called Ford 2000 that was to focus on globalizing corporate organizations and taking advantage of the economies of scale in purchasing and manufacturing by consolidating the North America, European, and international automobile operations. Ford 2000 also called for a complete reengineering of several key company processes including Order to Delivery (OTD) and Ford Production System (FPS). One of the primary strategic goals of Ford 2000 was to decrease OTD from 60+ days to less than 15. To help overcome information constraints in Ford’s new global approach, they launched a company-wide Intranet in mid-1996. In addition, Ford further expanded upon that system to include business-to-business (B2B) capacity by January 1997 which also comprised the Automotive Network Exchange......

Words: 1368 - Pages: 6

Ford Motor Company Supply Chain Strategy Case Report

...director of Supply Chain Systems, I have decided to implement portions of the new supply chain strategy of Virtual Integration and strategies from companies like Dell. Although there are several key differences between the companies, Dell’s virtual integration strategy can be applied to Ford’s supply chain operation. A modification of the virtual integration system currently used by Dell could be applied to Ford’s dependent supplier base, distribution system, dealerships and divisions. Special care will need to be taken to address the unique dependency of our custom Tier 1 supplier. The management of lower tier suppliers of general or generic components would be more effectively suited by the standard procedures used by Dell. If we at Ford could find a solution to the obstacles of virtual integration, it could make our supply chain run smoothly with less bottlenecking, inventory, and better overall performance. Managers could overcome the complex and error-prone manual process of forecasting and procuring parts which would result in reduced OTD lessen costs and enhance customer satisfaction. ISSUE IDENTIFICATION Senior Executives have asked how Ford should use the emerging information technologies and ideas from new high-tech industries to change the way we interact with Suppliers. We must find ways to improve the Supply Chain management and to increase shareholder value and Supply Chain responsiveness. Specifically we are looking at how Dell manages their......

Words: 3202 - Pages: 13

The Ford Motor Company’s Supply Chain Management

...The Ford Motor Company’s Supply Chain Management Landon Orchard 292 Windermere Court West, London, Ontario, Canada 519-661-7006 Landon Orchard is currently an undergraduate business management major at Ashland University, Ashland, Ohio North Central Ohio APICS Chapter Full-time undergraduate student The Ford Motor Company’s Supply Chain Management 2 The Ford Motor Company’s Supply Chain Management ABSTRACT The influx of foreign automobiles that flood the United States market is higher than ever before and American companies are struggling to adapt to this decrease in market share. Ford is one of the organizations that has restructured its supply chain strategy to better integrate suppliers into their system reducing cost and making delivery more efficient. INTRODUCTION Background of Ford As European and Asian car manufacturers continue to make advancements on the American markets, Ford's market share will decrease even further. One of the processes that Ford must improve is its supply chain management. By being able to speed up and better interact with suppliers and consumers, Ford will regain lost market share by communicating customer needs between themselves and their suppliers and acting upon these requests quicker and more efficiently. The Ford Motor Company has been the focus of supply chain operations analysts lately as they have begun to revamp their supply chains and how they interact with suppliers and customers. Ford has been a......

Words: 4991 - Pages: 20

Supply Chain Management - Ford Motor Company

...Part A: Literature Review Logistic systems and supply chains are continuously impacted by a multitude of internal and external variables. These variables include globalisation, shorter product life-cycles, technological advances, the development of electronic supply chains (ESC), increased communication, breakdowns of trade barriers, development of national economies and ever continuing efficiency improvements in transportation, manufacturing and communication (Gunaskeran, Patel & McGaughey 2004, Persson 1991). These factors can make creating and sustaining competitive advantage in supply chain management (SCM) a complicated and difficult task (Cavinato 1992, Persson 1991, Mehrjerdi 2009). A range of measures of supply chain competitiveness have been developed throughout SCM literature. Bhatangar & Sohal (2005, pg. 445) stated that there are “no stable set of measures that can be used for assessing the performance of the supply chain” (Lee & Billington 1992, Gunaskeran et al 2004). The pair constructed a framework (see Appendix A) that categorises and combines many of the concepts developed in the literature surrounding the competitiveness of supply chains. Gunaskeran et al (2004) also developed a framework for measuring performance in terms of strategic, tactical and operational levels of supply chain activity (See Appendix B). Developments in the perceptions of SCM are moving from a basic, purely cost approach to one of value-adding and non-cost measures such as customer......

Words: 6643 - Pages: 27