Employee Surveillance

In: Business and Management

Submitted By alekoleg
Words 1102
Pages 5
Assignment #1 – Electronic Surveillance of Employees

Explain Where an Employee Can Reasonably
Expect to Have Privacy in the Workplace When employees go to work, and clock in for all intensive purposes they are on company property and company time. Anything that occurs, or is said has to portray the company in the best way possible. When employees are on company property it is my opinion that the organization reserves the right to monitor their employees. The only place an employee should reasonably expect to have privacy is in the restroom area. When you first get hired by a company all your information regarding your social security, maiden names, emergency contacts, work history, incomes, even credit history, and background checks are examined. If it’s privacy regarding personal information people are concerned about there is nothing to protect. Your employer already has all your information on file. What is important is that the company discloses to their employees that they will be monitored and recorded, and by signing a contract they are giving up their privacy rights.
Explain Whether it Makes a Difference if an
Employee is in an Open Area or in an Enclosed Office
An employee that is on the clock is expected to be productive. There should be no reason why conversations taking place should not be work related, and if not they should still be appropriate for the workplace. Nothing illegal, inappropriate or disrespectful should occur or be discussed in open or closed areas. I believe employers have a right to monitor all offstage areas, excluding restrooms. If employees know offstage areas are subject to being monitored this would decrease the chances of a manager talking any kind of way to their employees behind closed doors, or employees stating that they were harassed when they were not. Emails that are going through company property meaning…...

Similar Documents

Electronic Surveillance of Employees

...Explain where an employee can reasonable expect to have privacy in the workplace. Some would say that workplace privacy rights are nonexistent in the private sector (Employee Issues, 2011). However, in order to be comfortable and successful in the workforce we as individuals need a certain amount of privacy. At the same token, employers have a desire to know certain information about not only the employee as an individual, but as a function of the corporation. Employers have a need to monitor things such as how productive and loyal the individual is to the corporation (Halbert & Ingulli, 2010). In today’s highly technical society, the ability to monitor employees at work has increased significantly. As a result, the need to determine what constitutes appropriate monitoring is discussed regularly. While heavily debated, there are situations in which an employee can expect to be protected from violating ones privacy in the workplace. Courts take into consideration two main factors. First, the obnoxiousness of the means used to intrude. If an organization uses unusual methods of gaining private information about an employee, this could be considered a violation of privacy. There is no expectation of privacy when it comes to corporate email communication, because is considered a usual to monitor corporate email. Secondly, there has to be a reasonable reason for intruding. To monitor the after hour activities of an employee who has filed a worker’s compensation claim,...

Words: 1223 - Pages: 5

Surveillance in Schools

...Surveillance Surveillance in Schools: Safety vs. Personal Privacy A project created by Kathy Davis, John Kelsey, Dia Langellier, Misty Mapes, and Jeff Rosendahl Project Home Security Cameras Metal Detectors Locker Searches Internet Tracking “Surveillance…n. close observation, esp. of a suspected person” [emphasis added] --Reader’s Digest Oxford Complete Wordfinder, 1996 In 1995, “The total number of crimes committed per year in or near the 85,000 U.S. public schools has been estimated at around 3 million” (Volokh & Snell, 1998). Our educational system is evolving all the time, and one factor that is constantly changing is the aggressiveness within our schools. In 1940, a survey of teachers revealed that the biggest behavioral problems they had from students were “talking out of turn, chewing gum, making noise, running in the halls, cutting in line, [violating] the dress code, [and] littering” (Volokh & Snell, 1998). In 1990, the toprated problems were “drug abuse, alcohol abuse, pregnancy, suicide, rape, robbery, [and] assault” (Volokh & Snell, 1998). In 1940, we had little need for surveillance beyond a teacher’s observation and intervention. Today, however, we live in a much more diverse society with troubled youth and adults who have easy access to weapons, drugs, pornography, etc., which have enabled students and staff to bring their violent and/or inappropriate tendencies into the naïve schools. What worked in 1940 (teacher-student confrontation) is not as......

Words: 17490 - Pages: 70

Electronic Surveillance

...Electronic Surveillance of Employee Professor Cowan LEG 500 April 24 2011 Table of Content Page Where an employee can reasonably expect to have privacy in the workplace ……………….. 1 Explain whether it makes a difference if an employee is in an open area or in an enclosed office………………………………………………………………………………………..….. 2 Explain if Herman’s need to know whether his salespersons are honest is a sufficient ground for utilizing electronic surveillance………………………………………………………….......2, 3 Explain to what extent an employer can engage in electronic surveillance of employees…………………………………………………………………………….……….3, 4 Explain to what extent the inclusion of innocent, unaware third –parties in such surveillance determines whether it is legal……………………………………………………….…….…...4, 5 Reference Cited………………………………………………………...…………Reference Page Electronic Surveillance Page 1 Explain where an employee can reasonably except to have privacy in the workplace. Based on the fact that the United States doesn’t have a comprehensive law that protects privacy, there is almost no where in the work place that is private. Most laws give the employer the ability to monitor their employees as long as they have a valid reason for their monitoring. With the advance tin technology employer’s ability to monitor their employees has expanded over last 20 years. Employers have the right to monitor telephone calls, computer usage, electronic mail, voice mail, and video monitoring. Most......

Words: 1353 - Pages: 6

Surveillance

...Roberto Cruz Professor Ibach English 104 April 28, 2015 Surveillance Many forms of surveillance have always existed as people watch over others for mutual care, for moral caution, and to figure out information secretly. If one has nothing to hide, then they have nothing to worry about. When one is in a public space, he/she is in the eye of the public. So what’s the difference in being watched by a closed circuit TV camera and being seen in public? Even if one is caught doing something embarrassing, the police will not arrest him/her and no surveillance officer will put an individual on national television. Surveillance does enhance our society for there are many advantages in having surveillance. Surveillance provides safety for a community, it can deter crime, and it catches many things that an individual doesn’t catch. Surveillance provides safety for a community. Surveillance cameras in public places ensures public safety. ToughEfrain26, a poll survey taker on Debate.org, states that “Surveillance cameras would to a safer public environment, by providing surveillance at times, and in areas where law officials cannot be present.” An individual will rarely attempt to harm another person when he/she is aware that his/her actions are being recorded on camera. Cameras keep an individual safe. Jonathan Sparco, a platinum level expert author for Enzine Articles, states that “A residential security system is becoming more and more important due to the increasing......

Words: 1094 - Pages: 5

Electronic Surveillance

...“Electronic Surveillance of Employees” Katy Romero Law, Ethics and Corporate Governance Dr. Andrea N. Brvenik Strayer University July 17, 2011 Electronic Surveillance of Employees An employer has the right to monitor the employees to increase the productivity and efficiency of its business. In the other hand, every person has the right of privacy within the organization. Human beings must experience a degree of privacy to thrive. Electronic surveillance is increasing every year within the organizations worldwide. This practice has created a debate among employees and employers. 1. Explain where an employee can reasonably expect to have privacy in a workplace Employees are becoming increasingly concerned about their privacy as their employers are monitoring them electronically more closely than ever before. Still employees expect to have privacy at the lunch area, bathrooms and lockers. Besides those places the employee has little or almost no privacy within the company. Electronic monitoring allows an employer to observe what employees do on the job and review employee communications, including e-mail and Internet activity, often capturing and reviewing communications that employees consider private. Now days, video monitoring is commonplace in many work environments to maintain security, monitor employees, and to deter theft. 2. In the workplace, there are typically two spaces, an open area in which there are several desks and where conversations can......

Words: 1139 - Pages: 5

Electronic Surveillance of Employees

...Running Head: Electronic Surveillance of Employees Electronic Surveillance of Employees Tenika Farris Professor: Anne Dewey- Balzhiser LEG 500-Law, Ethics & Corp. Governance 10/22/2011 Introduction New technology allows employers to monitor the job performance of their employees which has become a common practice in some workplaces. This procedure can be accomplished through e-mail, telephone, camera, internet and other electronic surveillance monitoring systems. This procedure was designed to be used solely for business purposes. In many instances employees have been made to feel as if their privacy has been invaded. Upon implementing such practices employers and employees both have a need to be knowledgable of any policies permitting the use of monitoring devices and to know their rights. Research The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA) is the only federal statute that offers workers protections in communications privacy. ECPA prohibits the intentional interception of electronic communications. However, the ECPA contains loopholes that facilitate employee monitoring. First, employers are permitted to monitor networks for business purposes. This enables employers to listen in on employee phone calls or to view employees' e-mail. Employers may not monitor purely personal calls, however, in order to determine that a call is personal, employers usually have to listen to portions of the employee's conversation. Second, an employer may intercept...

Words: 2157 - Pages: 9

Electronic Surveillance

...Electronic Surveillance of Employees Brent Schenkel Roy Basile, J.D LEG 500 October 23, 2011 Explain where an employee can reasonably expect to have privacy in the workplace. Obviously, employee privacy should not be an issue when it comes to a restroom or a locker room facility. This would invade personal privacy and has been upheld by numerous cases in a court of law. But any other parts of the grounds of the company are considered public areas and can have surveillance monitoring. Any areas where business can occur are fair game to monitor by either camera or microphone. Courts have upheld that parking lots and break rooms on the premises are still under the jurisdiction of the company. In the office workplace there are typically two types of workspaces, an open area, in which there are several desks and where conversations can be overhead, or an enclosed office, in which—when the door is closed—conversations cannot be heard and where one would expect virtually total privacy. Explain whether it makes a difference if an employee is in an open area or in an enclosed office. It should not make a difference of the location of the employee. Any action, conversation, or document inside the walls of a company is not private but public information. The employer has a right to search offices, work areas, desks, filing cabinets, lockers and office documents without the employee's permission. However, the employer should do in a lawful and non-threatening manner...

Words: 898 - Pages: 4

Surveillance in the Workplace

...that need for a specific policies regarding surveillance or monitoring in the workplace. The primary purpose of such policies is to eliminate any expectation of privacy on the part of an employee utilizing company technologies or property for personal use. However, even when an employer has a policy, it is nonetheless common for employers to tolerate some degree of private usage by employees. This is one dilemma for employers and the main purpose for establishing a "zero tolerance". In any event, the employer's written policy and actual practices should clarify to employees specifically and inform third parties through implied or informed consent the expectations of the employer or business utilizing surveillance. Assignment One 2 Question One 1. Explain where an employee can reasonably expect to have privacy in the workplace. In the office workplace there are typically two types of workspaces, an open area, in which there are several desks and where conversations can be overhead, or an enclosed office, in which—when the door is closed—conversations cannot be heard and where one would expect virtually total privacy. Explain whether it makes a difference if an employee is in an open area or in an enclosed office. Surveillance is becoming commonplace in the work environment. Generally speaking, employers are permitted to monitor by surveillance "public" areas. When surveillance is hidden, however, and when the surveillance is surreptitious, then the employer......

Words: 1870 - Pages: 8

Electronic Surveillance of Employees

...Electronic Surveillance of Employees LEG 500 Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance January 22, 2012 1. Explain where an employee can reasonably expect to have privacy in the workplace. Human beings need privacy and have a right to expect privacy in certain areas of their lives. The areas where an employee can reasonably expect to have privacy in the workplace are very limited. Common decency precludes monitoring in highly private locations, such as bathrooms. Personal items, such as purses, wallets and gym bags may also be considered to be off-limits. The employee can also reasonably expect privacy during personal telephone calls at work. In Watkins v. L. M. Berry (1983), the court upheld upon appeal that employers must stop monitoring calls upon realization that the call is of a personal nature. Exceptions to this are when employer policy specifically forbids calls of a personal nature. Here the employees need for privacy directly conflict with established policy. Privacy protection may vary with state laws and federal statutes. State laws on privacy in the workplace may differ with some states offering much more privacy protection to the employees than others. For example, Volkert (2005) reported that while electronic surveillance may be allowed in Idaho, it must have a specific purpose and record video only (no audio). Government employees are likely to have greater privacy rights than private sector employees due to protections under the Fourth Amendment......

Words: 1445 - Pages: 6

Electronic Surveillance

...Electronic Surveillance of Employees Employee privacy is a controversial topic. There is a need to ensure quality and accuracy in the interactions with customers. This need opens the discussion of what is insuring quality and what is an invasion of privacy. With the advancement in technology there are many surveillance options at the disposal of employers. The employer must review all surveillance options to determine which are legal as well as beneficial to customers, employees, and the business. Employers must consider these factors to make the best legal and ethical decision. Privacy in the Workplace Understanding the meaning of the word privacy is key to set standards of where in the workplace employees may expect discretion. Privacy is “the right to be free from secret surveillance, to determine whether, when, how and, to whom, one's personal or organizational information is to be revealed” ("Privacy," n.d.). Employees may reasonably expect to have privacy in several areas of the workplace. Two physically invasive areas which privacy should be a must are the restrooms and if one has an office with a door, a certain amount of privacy should be expected in that space. Other types of privacy a staff member can demand fairly is the confidentiality of their personal record, like background information, medical reports, social security numbers, financial information, corrective action, and any development plan the employee has engaged in. However, as far as monitoring......

Words: 1275 - Pages: 6

Electronic Surveillance of Employees

...Explain where an employee can reasonably expect to have privacy in the workplace. The only reasonable area an employee can expect to have privacy in the workplace is in the restroom. “Because electronic monitoring is now commonplace, it may be considered normal, if not accepted, as long as employers can point to a legitimate purpose for monitoring, it will be difficult for employees to win cases against them.” (Halbert & Ingulli pg 74). With this being said, within the private sector privacy law would allow for very minimal expectation of privacy anywhere other than the workplace facility’s’ lavatories. Depending on the workplaces provided service, a case can be made that there is a need to monitor to protect the companies interest as well as its customers. When dealing with the concept of privacy it’s important to consider personal privacy in relation to the company’s privacy and more paramount, company protection. As the video illustrated, the managers reasoning for monitoring his sales floor employee conversations was to protect the reputation of the car dealership as well as protect the business against any potential legal ramifications from dishonest sales employees. This is a very reasonable purpose for monitoring electronically to protect company interest. However, it would be in the interest of the company to communicate to its employees that they are being monitored so there is not sense of privacy invasion of its employees. As in the example with this case, it’s......

Words: 1421 - Pages: 6

Business Ethics Paper on Employee Surveillance

...walking in the office and someone says “how is your cousin?” How did they know my cousin had something wrong? You have just been a victim of employee surveillance. As long as the software and video equipment has been around, employers have monitored their employees. Employee surveillance is not illegal, but there is a thin line between wrong and right that deserves more analysis: An analysis of employee surveillance in the workplace reveals an ethical issue of spying on employees or protecting employees and the company. When most people think of the word privacy, they are thinking about their personal space and having some time to themselves without someone or something looking in on them. A further definition is required. “A right to privacy can be understood as a right to maintain a certain level of control over the inner spheres of personal information and access to one’s body, capacities, and powers” (Moore, 2008, p.420). Privacy in the workplace might be a restroom break or even sitting alone in a lunchroom. When it comes to doing work, privacy cannot be assumed by employees. Someone could be watching you at any time. Webster’s dictionary defines privacy as, “the quality or state of being apart from company or observation; freedom from unauthorized intrusion” (D. Nord, McCubbins, & J. Nord, 2006, p. 73). Who is under surveillance? According to the American Management Association, “more than three-quarters of all major U.S. firms are recording and reviewing......

Words: 2028 - Pages: 9

Employee Surveillance

...practice of electronic employee surveillance at work. Provide specific examples to support your argument. What laws, if any, may be violated by such practices?   I agree with the use of electronic employee surveillance in the workplace. I feel that in the current state of the country surveillance is needed for almost everything. The only places I believe it shouldn’t be used is the restrooms. The use of electronic employee surveillance at work should be placed in areas that need monitoring where theft may occur or immoral activities may occur. Depending on the company size or the type of industry, if an employee is not performing, I believe it could be noticed having supervisors and managers, surveillance may not be necessary. The privacy of employees may be violated with these cameras and so i believe it should be placed at areas that are necessary. The company i work for, only has two cameras because, once a fourth or more is placed, the company is required to hire a security to sit by these surveillance and monitor them, which is also costly. Some states have also passed laws that deal with workplace privacy, including the use of cameras and video equipment. In California, for example, it's a crime to install a surveillance mirror (one that can be seen through from only one side and looks like a mirror on the other) in a restroom, shower, fitting room, or locker room. In Connecticut, employers may not operate surveillance equipment in areas designed for employee rest......

Words: 474 - Pages: 2

Employee Surveillance and Testing

..."Employee Surveillance and Testing" Please respond to the following: Argue for or against the practice of electronic employee surveillance at work. Provide specific examples to support your argument. What laws, if any, may be violated by such practices? Employers want to be sure their employees are doing a good job, but employees don't want their every sneeze or trip to the water cooler logged. That's the essential conflict of workplace monitoring. New technologies make it possible for employers to monitor many aspects of their employees' jobs, especially on telephones, computer terminals, through electronic and voice mail, and when employees are using the Internet. Such monitoring is virtually unregulated. Therefore, unless company policy specifically states otherwise (and even this is not assured), your employer may listen, watch and read most of your workplace communications. One company offers technology that claims to provide insight into individual employee behavior based on the trail of "digital footprints" created each day in the workplace. This behavioral modeling technology can piece together all of these electronic records to provide behavior patterns that employers may utilize to evaluate employee performance and conduct. For example, it might look for word patterns, changes in language or style, and communication patterns between individuals. Recent surveys have found that a majority of employers monitor their employees. They are motivated by concern over......

Words: 3354 - Pages: 14

Surveillance

...Build Your Own Micro RC Surveillance Robot HOW DO YOU BUILD YOUR OWN MICRO RC SURVEILLANCE ROBOT? Why don't I show you how?   Almost every roboticist has wanted to create a small Surveillance Robot at some point in their time. The biggest problem being the Receiver/Transmitter pairs are always too expensive. My solution: Extract the RC receiver from a small RC car and modify it for our purposes. By the end of this tutorial, you will create and modify an RC robot to do: 1. Direct Radio Control using the remote's joysticks. 2. Computer control via a microcontroller connected to the remote.   Later, I plan on making this base teleoperational. When I do, I'll be sure to document it and continue the tutorial for it!!!!!!!!!!    It will used the receiver from a $10 ZipZaps RC car purchased at a RadioShack (US) or a Microz GT car purchased at The Source (Canada). Any inexpensive RC car, though, will do. It will also use a wireless camera and 2 Solarbotics gear motors.  The main goal of this robot always remains the same; to be able to perform surveillance that you could watch on your television or on your computer (this depends on the camera used). I broke this tutorial into steps for simplicity and organization of categories (why should you put the construction of chassis with building the electronics? :P) Now for some general examples of the design for the robot (you don't have to follow my example exactly). The image at the top of the page shows an angled view of...

Words: 5094 - Pages: 21