In: Science

Submitted By houls10
Words 828
Pages 4
1. I believe that creationism is somewhat hard to believe. Creationism rejects evolution which is something that I definitely do not reject. I believe that there had to be some point in time where everything began. However, I am not sure what happened or what was created at the beginning. I just do not think that humans just showed up as the way that humans are now and did not evolve from anything. That, to me, just sounds ridiculous.
2. I am definitely a believer in evolution over creationism. I think that the scientific information to back up evolution is too strong to deny. I think the people who do deny evolution are either too stubborn or too naïve and ignorant to believe in it. I definitely believe that there was something that happened at some point in time which helped apes learn certain things that they were unable to learn beforehand which then led to the evolution of humans.
3. I am somewhat torn in the middle on whether or not all species came from one single organism. I think it is definitely possible. However, I think it would make more sense to same certain types came from a single organism. Birds, bats, and certain insects are an example. They have flying abilities with wings which could show that they came from a certain organism. It might just be that they evolved and adapted in different ways which could explain humans with apes and monkeys.
4. I think that being an active Catholic can affect the way you view everything if you let it. As for me, I think it definitely affected me in my younger years. I think as you grow older you become more independent and are able to learn things more on your own. I also think the time that we live in now helps because of the internet and all of the information and knowledge that we are exposed to. It is up to you to open up your mind to new ideas and to be curious.
5. I do believe that we came from a higher…...

Similar Documents


...Darwinism is a theory regarding the evolution of the species. Darwinism does not speak specifically to the beginning of the universe. God's existence either as the starter or the responsible entity for secondary causation does not negate Darwinism. It may just be a methodology for explaining secondary causation that according to current understading is rather haphazard or random. Gregory Mendel was an Augustian Monk and considered the founder of mondern genetic theory, his life alone should be proof that God and Darwin can coexist. Mendel was interested in heredity and did major work in the development of the study of the genetics of plants before the science was even beginning to be developed. Historically issues of faith and science have collided and I would think that both theology and science have its place in the world as the search for knowledge continues. Religious Fundamentalism which requires a literal interpretation of the Bible as a substitute for science is bad theology and bad for science, and mistakenly puts the science and theology at war assuming that there is only one truth and it exists in one place and is not subject to any further interpretation. Simil arly mean spirited materialistic science which negates or belittles theology is similarly wrong headed and denies much of the basis from which it came. Historically I believe that both science and theology have their place in explaining man's and or women's place in the universe and their relation to...

Words: 398 - Pages: 2

Social Darwinism

...Abstract Social Darwinism is a political theory that emphasizes struggle and competition, and claims that human racial stock improves by allowing ruthless and unrestrained competition in the economic realm. Social Darwinism apples the concepts of biological evolution to social and moral development by stating that it is social evolution through the "survival of the fittest" in a struggle for an existence in which the strong prevail and the weak are defeated. Currently, we use the terms of Darwinism, natural selection, and evolution interchangeably and use them to describe a process which uses random variations, and mutations are preserved through a process of natural competition that favors beneficial changes. A History and Understanding of Social Darwinism The term Darwinism may cause confusion in some people because they confuse Darwinism, the scientific theory, with Social Darwinism, the ethical theory. In truth, except for the name and a few basic principles, the two ideas do not have much in common and has very little to do with Charles Darwin, the English naturalist who famously suggested the scientific theory which states that a branching pattern of evolution resulted from a process he called natural selection. Social Darwinism is a term that started near the end of the nineteenth century and describes a set of social policies and theories designed to reduce the power of government with theories that attempt to explain the biological cause of human behavior. For......

Words: 3138 - Pages: 13

Darwin's Influence on Discrimination

...Evolution, but also the Father of Racism. “The very heart of Darwinism is the belief that evolution proceeds by the differential survival of the fittest or superior individuals. This requires differences among a species, which in time become great enough so that those individuals that possess advantageous features – the fittest – are more apt to survive” (Bergman). Movements such as Hitler’s Nazi party was in support of the Aryan race, and under careful analysis one could see that Nazi Germany believed that races such as the Jews were inferior. He was attempting to control evolution and ameliorate the human race by wiping out those races that are inferior and could “contaminate” the Aryan gene pool. The previous religious belief that “God created all men” was replaced by “Darwinism” in the 19th century and that the evolution of mankind meant the inequality of the races. Hitler tried to create a better human society based on Darwinism, “Take away the Nordic Germans and nothing remains but the dance of apes” (Yahya). This Social Darwinism and “survival of the fittest” idea caused eugenics movements in Nazi Germany as well as the United States’ segregation policy and outlawing inter-race marriages. Darwin’s research caused millions of people who were considered to be inferior to suffer. “Hitler and the Nazi party claimed that one of their major goals was to apply this accepted ‘science’ to society. And ‘the core idea of Darwinism was not evolution, but selection.......

Words: 2044 - Pages: 9

Psychological Egoism

...Faith Holloway Dr Justin Sytsma PHIL 105 May 5 2014 Critical Analysis of Psychological Egoism Psychological egoism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (2010), entails that each person has but one ultimate aim: her own welfare. This essay will explore the meaning of psychological egoism, how arguments can be justifiably presented and why this theory is commonly appealing to philosophers. Often supporters of psychological egoism will present arguments through theories such as Darwinism and Desire Satisfaction. This essay essentially aims to critically assess the substantiality of these arguments. In order to correctly assess the arguments in favour of psychological egoism, firstly it must be stated what is implied by these arguments. Psychological egoism has many differences to other egoist theories such as ethical egoism, which state we should be selfish. Psychological egoism however states that all human actions are uncontrollably selfish, and that this is part of our human nature. It should be noted before continuing that this essay will be assessing this more radical form of psychological egoism , which identifies that ‘selfishness is’ the only way one can possibly performs actions, disregarding any consideration of others unless this aids their selfish action in some way. Psychological egoism can seem plausible to its supporters for a variety of reasons. Some of the most common include the concept that desires are entirely our own and therefore......

Words: 2289 - Pages: 10

Charles Darwin on Darwinism

...theory was published in 1859, in On the Origin of Species. This book is often referred to as "the book that shook the world. The Origin sold out on the first day of publication and subsequently went through six editions. Charles Darwin also contributed to the Market economy with his belief "survival of the fittest." In a free enterprise system, it is believed that the best will survive while the less efficient will collapse if the market is allowed to work without government interference. In a market economy, since the government has very little control of the businesses, the companies must work their hardest and come out with good products that will outsell the ones of their competition. Social Darwinism basically means that the strong will control the weak. Social Darwinism comes from the laws of natural selection as Darwin had stated. According to his theory, which was very popular in the late 19th century and early 20th centuries, the weak were diminished, while the strong grew in power and in cultural influence over the weak. In command economies, this is basically what is happening. There is very little freedom, and the strong (mostly government) will control the weak as in what to do, produce, etc....

Words: 326 - Pages: 2

Social Darwinism

...Social Darwinism The social theory or ideology of Social Darwinism, which was prominent during the late 1800s, was a source of both controversy and conflict in Victorian Society and other nations, where imperialists, capitalists and colonialists manipulated Social Darwinism to justify horrific acts of genocide and cultural destruction. Upon the publication of Darwin’s revolutionary theory of evolution, The Origin of Species, uproar was caused in Victorian Society at the notion that humans were related to apes, to animals, which was unthinkable at the time largely because it contravened prevailing religious beliefs. This upheaval was the very beginning of a new age of political thinking and sociological ideas. Society was very quickly divided into those who applied Darwin’s theory of Natural Selection to society and philosophy, and those who opposed the idea, maintaining that Darwin’s theories should not be applied to Homo sapiens…us and that these theories contradicted the most fundamental of moral beliefs and principles. Hence, Social Darwinism was born in all its controversy. However, despite the controversial nature of Darwin’s theories, science and its trends were held in high esteem in Victorian England. Through this, fraudulent governments and individuals motivated by greed for wealth and power were able to justify their actions by manipulating Social Darwinism to fit their purpose, claiming that if science said so, then it must be so. However, Social Darwinism was......

Words: 2671 - Pages: 11

Economic Darwinism

...What is Economic Darwinism? Economic Darwinism is a theory that inherent major forces at work around the globe that allows only the fittest organization or person to prosper in a competitive situation or environment. It’s a process where Corporations throughout their operation as competition weeds out ill designed organizations that fail to adapt to firm business strategies. According to Charles Darwin the collapse of Enron, is an example of how competition tends to weed out the less fit. Strong pressure from the competition in the marketplace provides efficient organizational decisions. Those firms with low cost are most likely to survive, and the firms that adopt inefficient, high cost policies competition will place strong pressure on these firms to either adapt or close (Brickley, Smith & Zimmerman 2009). According to Fama and Jensen (1983) suggests that “the form of organization that survives in an activity is the one that delivers the product demanded by customers at the lowest price while covering cost". As a survival criterion it helps highlight that while a well-crafted organization architecture can contribute to a firm’s success, it is not sufficient for a success .The firm must have a business strategy that includes products for which the prices customers are willing to pay exceed cost. An architecture as a choice, given a firm business strategy, can have an important impact on profitability and value. They can also lower cost by promoting efficient......

Words: 859 - Pages: 4


...I. Darwinism A. What is it? Darwinism is a theory of biological evolution developed by Charles Darwin and others, stating that all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individual's ability to compete, survive, and reproduce. B. Types of Darwinism a. Social Darwinism - it is a modern name given to various theories of society that emerged in the United Kingdom, North America, and Western Europe in the 1870s, and which are claimed to have applied biological concepts of natural selection and survival of the fittest to sociology and politics. Social Darwinists generally argue that the strong should see their wealth and power increase while the weak should see their wealth and power decrease. b. Neo-Darwinism - is the "modern synthesis" of Darwinian evolution through natural selection with Mendelian genetics, the latter being a set of primary tenets specifying that evolution involves the transmission of characteristics from parent to child through the mechanism of genetic transfer, rather than the "blending process" of pre-Mendelian evolutionary science. c. Neural Darwinism – is a large scale theory of brain function by Gerald Edelman, was initially published in 1978, in a book called The Mindful Brain. Edelman was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1972 for his work in immunology showing how the population of lymphocytes capable of binding to a foreign...

Words: 871 - Pages: 4


...Selective Breeding and Genetics Darwinism and the theory of natural selection had far reaching implications for society both culturally and scientifically. For the first time in history a theory was proposed that offered a plausible mechanism for evolution. This paper examines the science behind natural selection as well as the impact Darwin has had on modern evolutionary paradigms. Specifically it poses two questions: (1) How did Darwin formulate his ideas about natural selection and evolution? And (2) Is natural selection still fundamentally valid or have we moved into a new evolutionary paradigm. Pre Darwin. Every scientific field has an earlier paradigm as scientific cannons change through the process of time. Before the advent of Darwin and his ideas about “natural selection” human evolution was perceived quite differently. During the Medieval Ages the predominate field of thought was in the “Great Chain of Being.” A structured hierarchy that believed everything had its place in a divinely inspired universe (Suber, 1997). An objects place on the “evolutionary” chain depended on the amount of “spirit” or “matter” it contained, less “spirit” and more “matter” placed it further down on the chain. Ideas such as “spontaneous generation,” which stated that organism could arrive fully formed from inorganic matter only served to enforce Christian ideals of divine inspiration and hinder any kind of true scientific research. (Evers, 1999) Carolus Linnaeus (1707-1778)...

Words: 1718 - Pages: 7


...1. Darwinism: I. What Is Darwinism? “Darwinism, when it was first put into the lexicon by Thomas Huxley in 1860, was only meant to describe the belief that species change over time. In the most basic of terms, Darwinism became synonymous with Charles Darwin's explanation of evolution and, to an extent, his description of natural selection. These ideas, first published in his arguably most famous book On the Origin of Species, were direct and have stood the test of time. So, originally, Darwinism only included the fact that species change over time due to nature selecting the most favorable adaptations within the population. These individuals with the better adaptations lived long enough to reproduce and pass those traits down to the next generation, ensuring the species' survival.” II. Different Types of Darwinism Neo-Darwinism – “Neo-Darwinism, also called the modern evolutionary synthesis, generally denotes the integration of Charles Darwin's theory ofevolution by natural selection, Gregor Mendel's theory of genetics as the basis for biological inheritance, and mathematical population genetics. Although this was not the historical meaning of the term neo-Darwinism, it has been the popular and scientific use of the expression since the synthesis of the 1930s” Social Darwinism –“Social Darwinism, term coined in the late 19th century to describe the idea that humans, like animals and plants, compete in a struggle for existence in which natural selection results......

Words: 629 - Pages: 3

The End Justifies the Means

...function well as members of our species. Social Darwinism, as explained by Quist-Adade (2006) is the theory that believes some societies, races, etc are endowed with superior genes, while others inherit inferior genes. In this paper I will talk about the relationship between natural law and Social Darwinism and between Social Darwinism and racism. I will also explain if my opinion about Social Darwinism changed or remained the same after reading the article “What is race and what is racism” by Quist-Adade. Finally I will explain how the theory of Social Darwinism and the information in the article influenced my views on natural law and natural rights, and what problems might arise from trying to apply these theories in society. After reading the article, the relationship of natural law and Social Darwinism did surprise me a little. Professor Bannister writing for Encarta Online Encyclopedia explains Darwin applied his theories of natural selection specifically to people in The Descent of Man, which many critics viewed as justification for the cruel social policies in England at the time, and imperialism abroad. Herbert Spencer used his understanding of Darwin’s evolution theory and combined it with natural law to come up with a perverse new theory where the term “survival of the fittest” was coined. This is surprising to me because natural law is supposed to see what is essential for us to function well as human beings, and Social Darwinism finds a way to distort that into......

Words: 902 - Pages: 4

Industrial Revolution Changes

...William Feola Topic 4 Essay 2/23/2016 In the middle of the nineteenth century, European societies were going through tremendous changes due to politicization of the ordinary, helped by the French Revolution, and the Industrial Revolution. During these changes and challenges, intellectuals and political activists proposed different approaches to making society function better. Different bodies of thoughts were proposed and political organizations that supported different ideologies were created. These groups and organizations stemmed from liberalism, feminism, romanticism and Social Darwinism. These groups, the liberalists, feminists, romanticists and the Social Darwinists, had to try to cope with the rapid modernization of the west precipitated by the Industrial Revolution. In this essay we are going to talk about how each group was able to cope with the rapid modernization and how they were able to face the changes and challenges. First of all, we saw liberalism try to cope with the rapid modernization of the west precipitated by the Industrial Revolution. These liberals thought that human life and society could progress without having violent revolutions or relying on tradition. Non-violent approaches to changing society is called liberalism. The liberals during the time of the Industrial Revolution believed that individuals had the power to reason and that they are rational. In other words, it means they are capable of bettering themselves without destroying......

Words: 1351 - Pages: 6

Social Darwinism

...Social Darwinism Social Darwinism is a concept that is applied to both the natural work and the way people reside on the Earth. It is described as a survival of only the strongest will survive and pursue life and leave the weak behind. Darwinism seems to be called inferior beings that are forcefully changed in order to meet the demands. It was also used to explain how the United States economy was so competitive and to justify the elimination of the less power. Social Darwinism was used by both Karl Marx and Adolf Hitler. They had both used this to defend their views about the world. Karl Marx focused on capitalism, business, and power. In the business world those who are weak will not success. And whoever has power will have a higher social status. Adolf Hitler had used Darwinism so it could be applied to the Germans. He believed that his people (the nazi’s) were superior and that his race thrived, which he had millions of men, women, and children exterminated in an act of genocide. Hitler had also used eugenics against the Germans. Eugenics was what wiped away all the Germans that were not fitting in with Hitler’s expectations. The main solution for eugenicists was the rapid expansion of forced segregation, and also well known as marriage restrictions. Only after eugenics became introduced into the United States it was transplanted into Germany. This was when the hatred towards Germans started. Hitler had told his Nazi’s that “the laws of several American States......

Words: 567 - Pages: 3

Social Darwinism

...In the novel, Lord of the Flies, the boys show the concept of Social Darwinism. The boys showed their level of strength by either dying or surviving when on the island. The concept of Social Darwinism is the natural selection of people best suited to live in society. This novel ties to the article Social Darwinism because some of the boys are stronger than the others, causing them to survive and the weaker to die. The novel Lord of the Flies represents a concept of Social Darwinism because the boys were separated into groups based on their fit and unfit personalities in society. Social Darwinism states that the strong and more fit should flourish in society while the weak and unfit should be allowed to die. In the novel, there are two groups formed, the weak and the strong. The two groups in the novel represent Social Darwinism. Herbert Spencer, the father of Social Darwinism, believed that it was “natural, normal, and proper for the strong to thrive at the expense of the weak,” as stated in the article. This meant that the strong and more fit were able to do anything that would help them flourish in society. The weak were usually left to die. Usually the weak have nothing to do in order for them to advance in society so they were the ones that were always hurt first. This can be related to the novel because in the novel, there are two groups, the strong and more fit and the weak and unfit. The group that is strong and more fit into society are the hunters, Jack’s group.......

Words: 699 - Pages: 3


...markets. Question 5- Discuss the following theories Social Darwinism (3 marks) Protestant Ethics (3 marks) Social Darwinism is an application of the theory of natural selection to social, political, and economic issues. In its simplest form, Social Darwinism follows the mantra of "the strong survive," including human issues. This theory was used to promote the idea that the white European race was superior to others, and therefore, destined to rule over them. Herbert Spencer, a 19th century philosopher, promoted the idea of Social Darwinism. At the time that Spencer began to promote Social Darwinism, the technology, economy, and government of the "White European" was advanced in comparison to that of other cultures. Looking at this apparent advantage, as well as the economic and military structures, some argued that natural selection was playing out, and that the race more suited to survival was winning. Some even extended this philosophy into a micro-economic issue, claiming that social welfare programs that helped the poor and disadvantaged were contrary to nature itself. At its worst, the implications of Social Darwinism were used as scientific justification for the Holocaust. The Nazis claimed that the murder of Jews in World War II was an example of cleaning out the inferior genetics. In nature, the strong survive and those best suited to survival will out-live the weak. According to Social Darwinism, those with strength flourish and those without are destined......

Words: 2616 - Pages: 11