Free Essay

Chiquita: Doomed If We Do, Doomed If We Don't

In: Business and Management

Submitted By elikyuyu
Words 1999
Pages 8
University of Caloocan City
Camarin Campus

A business case analysis entitled

“Chiquita: Doomed if we do, doomed if we don’t”

Shane Marie Diesta
Christian Balagtas
Eric Jay Etoc

II. Recommendation Statement
Our team recommends Chiquita International to withdraw their segment in Columbia should the threat of the AUC puts the life of the employees and the compliance with the government at stake.

III. Background Information
Chiquita Brands International, Inc. (“Chiquita”) ,along with its subsidiaries, is an international marketer and distributor of bananas and pineapples sold under the Chiquita and other brand names in 70 countries, and packaged salads sold under the Fresh Express and other brand names primarily in the United States. With over twenty six thousand employees across six continents, the banana company faced one of its red hot scandals, right in Columbia.
Chiquita admitted that it had been paying for years to the violent, right-wing terrorist organization United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia – an English translation of the Spanish name of the group, "Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia" (commonly known as and referred to hereinafter as the "AUC") in exchange of AUC not giving harm to Chiquita’s employees.
The AUC had been designated by the U.S. government as a Foreign Terrorist Organization ("FTO") on Sept. 10, 2001, and these designations made it a federal crime for Chiquita, as a U.S. corporation, to provide money to the AUC. In April 2003, Chiquita made a voluntary self-disclosure to the government of its payments to the AUC, giving rise to this investigation.
"Like any criminal enterprise, a terrorist organization needs a funding stream to support its operations. For several years, the AUC terrorist group found one in the payments they demanded from Chiquita Brands International. Thanks to Chiquita's cooperation and this prosecution, that funding stream is now dry and corporations are on notice that they cannot make protection payments to terrorists," said Assistant Attorney General Wainstein.
"Funding a terrorist organization can never be treated as a cost of doing business," stated U.S. Attorney Taylor. "American businesses must take note that payments to terrorists are of a whole different category. They are crimes. But like adjustments that American businesses made to the passage of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act decades ago, American businesses, as good corporate citizens, will find ways to conform their conduct to the requirements of the law and still remain competitive."
"This case clearly demonstrates the commitment of the Commerce Department and its Bureau of Industry and Security to the Administration's fight against terrorist financing," said Commerce Deputy Assistant Secretary Wysong.
"The message to industry from this guilty plea today is that the U.S. Government will bring its full power to bear in the investigation of those who conduct business with designated terrorist organizations, even when those acts occur outside of the United States," said ICE Special Agent in Charge Reid.
Following the company's disclosure, the investigation leading to this prosecution developed evidence that for over six years – from sometime in 1997 through Feb. 4, 2004 – Chiquita paid money to the AUC in two regions of the Republic of Colombia where Chiquita had banana-producing operations: Urabá and Santa Marta. Chiquita made these payments through its wholly-owned Colombian subsidiary known as "Banadex." By 2003, Banadex was Chiquita's most profitable operation. Chiquita, through Banadex, paid the AUC nearly every month. In total, Chiquita made over 100 payments to the AUC amounting to over $1.7 million.
Chiquita began paying the AUC following a meeting in 1997 between the then-leader of the AUC, Carlos Castaño, and a senior executive of Banadex. Castaño implied that failure to make the payments could result in physical harm to Banadex personnel and property. No later than September 2000, Chiquita's senior executives knew that the corporation was paying the AUC and that the AUC was a violent, paramilitary organization led by Carlos Castaño. Chiquita's payments to the AUC were reviewed and approved by senior executives of the corporation, including high-ranking officers, directors and employees.
For several years Chiquita paid the AUC by check through various intermediaries. Chiquita recorded these payments in its corporate books and records as "security payments" or payments for "security" or "security services." Chiquita never received any actual security services in exchange for the payments.
Beginning in June 2002, Chiquita began paying the AUC in Santa Marta directly and in cash according to new procedures established by senior executives of Chiquita. The newly-implemented procedures concealed the fact that Chiquita was making direct cash payments to the AUC. A senior Chiquita officer had described these new procedures to Chiquita's Audit Committee on April 23, 2002.
The U.S. government designated the AUC as an FTO on Sept. 10, 2001, and that designation was well-publicized in the American public media. The AUC's designation was even more widely reported in the public media in Colombia, where Chiquita had its substantial banana-producing operations. Chiquita also had specific information about the AUC's designation as an FTO through an Internet-based, password-protected subscription service that Chiquita paid money to receive. Nevertheless, from Sept. 10, 2001 through Feb. 4, 2004, Chiquita made 50 payments to the AUC totaling over $825,000.
On Feb. 20, 2003, a Chiquita employee told a senior Chiquita officer that he had discovered that the AUC had been designated by the U.S. government as an FTO. Shortly thereafter, these Chiquita officials spoke with attorneys in the District of Columbia office of a national law firm ("outside counsel") about Chiquita's ongoing payments to the AUC. Beginning on Feb. 21, 2003, outside counsel emphatically advised Chiquita that the payments were illegal under United States law and that Chiquita should immediately stop paying the AUC directly or indirectly. Outside counsel advised Chiquita to stop making payments to the terrorist organization. Also, they cite that "You voluntarily put yourself in this position. Duress defense can wear out through repetition. Buz [business] decision to stay in harm's way. Chiquita should leave Colombia." and that "[T]he company should not continue to make the Santa Marta payments, given the AUC's designation as a foreign terrorist organization"
On April 3, 2003, a senior Chiquita officer and a member of Chiquita's Board of Directors first reported to the full Board that Chiquita was making payments to a designated FTO. A Board member objected to the payments and recommended that Chiquita consider taking immediate corrective action, including withdrawing from Colombia. The Board did not follow that recommendation, but instead agreed to disclose promptly to the Department of Justice the fact that Chiquita had been making payments to the AUC. Meanwhile, Banadex personnel were instructed to continue making the payments
On April 24, 2003, a senior Chiquita officer and a Chiquita Board member, along with outside counsel, disclosed to officials of the U.S. Department of Justice that Chiquita had been making payments to the AUC for years, and represented that the payments had been made under threat of violence. Department of Justice officials told the Chiquita representatives that the payments were illegal and could not continue. Department of Justice officials acknowledged that the issue of continued payments was complicated. On Sept. 8, 2003, outside counsel advised Chiquita in writing that: "[Department of Justice] officials have been unwilling to give assurances or guarantees of non-prosecution; in fact, officials have repeatedly stated that they view the circumstances presented as a technical violation and cannot endorse current or future payments."
Notwithstanding the persistent advice of its outside counsel, the Department of Justice's statement that the payments were illegal and could not continue, and Board involvement in the matter, Chiquita continued to pay the AUC throughout 2003 and early 2004. From April 24, 2003 (the date of Chiquita's initial disclosure to the Justice Department) through February 4, 2004, Chiquita made 20 payments to the AUC totaling over $300,000. Chiquita sold Banadex to a Colombian buyer in June 2004 at a loss of $9 Million.
Chiquita has already provided the government with voluminous corporate records and made numerous company witnesses available for questioning in connection with this matter. As part of the plea agreement, Chiquita has committed to cooperate fully with the ongoing investigation.

IV. Problem Statement
The dilemma of Chiquita brands international from choosing between the life of its employees and conformity of its conduct the requirements of law.

V. Assumptions 1. The analysts assumes that Chiquita Brands International values profit more than law. 2. The analysts assumes that the payments of Chiquita to the AUC prior to its designation as a Foreign Terrorist Organization were legal.

VI. Analysis
The researchers used What-If analysis which uses the hypothetical situations to anticipate possible outcomes and generate qualitative descriptions of problems in the form of questions and answers, as well as lists of recommendations for preventing problems.
The following hypothetical questions would be the basis for our analysis: 1. If AUC have not been designated as an FTO, what would be the best choice to Chiquita’s dilemma (continue paying AUC, stop paying AUC)? 2. If AUC have not been designated as an FTO, what would be the best choice to Chiquita’s dilemma (continue paying AUC, stop paying AUC)?
If AUC have not been designated as an FTO, the best decision for Chiquita is to pay the terrorists because with these payments, Chiquita would prevent harm from its employees, in addition to the fact that they are still conforming their conduct to the requirements of the law as the said payment is not illegal. If they pay AUC, the life of the employees and the law are not given up, and the business lingers.
If AUC have been designated as an FTO, the best decision for Chiquita is neither to pay the terrorists, nor stop payments to them. If they pay the AUC, the Chiquita’s conformity to the law will be forsaken. On the other hand, if they would stop payment, the lives of its employees would be at stake. The researchers believe that if the persistence of the business (in this case, the Banadex segment in Columbia) would require Chiquita to choose between the life of its employees and the conformity of their conduct to the requirements of the law, it would better to withdraw the business, just like the one of the board members have recommended.

VII. Detailed Recommendation
The analysts recommend Chiquita brand international, Inc. to withdraw its segment in Columbia from the time it came to its knowledge that the AUC was designated as an international terrorists since it is the best alternative that the companyy can do to protect the lives of its employees and at he same time to avoid the noncompliance with the prevailing law of the state.
Before the designation of the AUC as an international terrorists bu the United States of America, the analysts recommend the company to make the payment to AUC since this payment is not yet illegal at that time and will ensure the safety of its employees.
On September 10, 2001, the AUC was designated as an international terrorist. From this time, it will no longer be practicable for the company to make the payments since it will already constitutean illegal act. However, nonpayment to AUC shall cause them to kill employees of Chiquita to close its business in Columbia so that its employees would not be in danger and it will be able to escape the intimidation and violence AUC.

VIII. Appendices…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Do We Have Free Will?

...Do We Have Free Will? It is Friday night and your friends have just invited you to what is supposed to be the best party of the year, but it is your little brother’s birthday. Right before the party, you sit down to weigh your options and decided to stay home to celebrate your little brother’s birthday. Did you just make a free choice, or was your decision just the result of the natural laws in the universe coming together forcing you to stay home? In the words of Arthur Schopenhauer, ""Man can do what he wills but he cannot will what he wills" . According to this, though you may believe that you have the complete freedom to choose where you wanted to go, your ultimate choice was caused by the events that occurred before this one. Although the choice of going to the party or staying home may seem to have given the illusion of free will, there was ultimately a physical law that could most likely explain why this decision was made. First off, there are three main viewpoints on the idea of free will: compatibilism, determinism, and indeterminism. Compatibilists state that it is possible for both free will and determinism to exist at the same time. Given an instance, a compatibilist will say that even though you are only really presented with one option in all situations, if this option is in accordance with the your true desires, then you have free will. Another idea some compatibilists believe is that there is always a natural law that can explain an outcome, but......

Words: 895 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Why We Do What We Do

...RUNNING HEAD: Why We Do Why We Do What We Do “To be or not to be that is the question” (Shakespeare, 1945) most notably said in Shakespearian text. Today we ask the same question within our actions. Are we able to be ourselves in the decisions we make or are we not? In business we exam many problems and situations and act appropriately based the business needs and practices. In many cases the decisions we make our not within our means or not based on whom we are. Many business decisions are made with utilitarian approach. The decision is based not on the character of the person but the decision itself. Decisions like these can often make or break a company. “Character is a major component of leadership. This goes hand and hand with integrity and commitment will come naturally.”(Klann, 2007) Developing Character can lead to major personal achievements within an organization. Virtue Theory shifts the focus of decision making based on rules and regulations to morals and ethics based on one’s self being. This can be seen in a positive light depending on the business someone conducts. In many situations it can lead to difficult decision making when it comes to organizations that have to abide by certain policies and procedures that may not agree with an individual’s morals and ethics. “Is it wrong to steal a loaf of bread to feed your family…?” (Groening, 1989) Deontology brings us the dilemma of what the moral high ground is and why. Individual morality differs for each......

Words: 437 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Why Don't We Eat Dogs?

...Why Don’t We Eat Dogs? Franklin Salcedo DeVry University 01-27-2013 Why Don’t We Eat Dogs? What makes some animals better than others? Or better yet, why do we eat certain animals while it is a crime to eat others? It is questions like these that many people would hope to ignore forever or rather avoid. But as humans, these are the type of questions which define us as better beings and often challenge us to think and act in a way that’s worthy of our better capabilities, intellect, conscience, and hearts. If only an animal would ever speak or rise up the way many human rights activist did in the past in defense of human equality regardless of race or skin color. Surely we would have massive protests and riots from pigs, cows, lambs, goats, and many other animals whose rights are just completely ignore by the vast majority. It is sad to see that these rights are only applied in favor of a handful of animals, while others are locked away and confined to feedlots where the powerful meat industry obliterates their rights and turn their lives into profitable pieces of meat. Though it is legal by law, culture, and trade, the maltreatment and killing of these animals to feed the inhumane and greedy meat for profit industry must stop not only because it violates animal rights, but also because it promotes an agenda of animal abuse, exploitation, and unhealthy human nutrition for generations to come. Instead, the Government should partner up with animal rights activist groups......

Words: 2645 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Why We Do Not Do Drugs?

...feels. We see drugs on TV and movies every day. Many young people encounter them at school, at home or in their neighborhood. It is not unusual to be curious about something you see and hear about so often, so many people first try drugs because they are curious about them. Another reason young people take drugs is to escape their reality. Maybe their home life is not very happy. Maybe they have a boring job, are not doing well in school, or are just not happy with their life for whatever reason. For many people, drugs are a way to escape that unhappy reality. They can feel a little braver, stronger, a little smarter, more beautiful or more important. Of course this doesn't last long, but that doesn't matter. For the brief time that the drugs are taking affect, the user can forget about the problems, responsibilities and limitations of everyday life and escape to a fantasy world. It is no secret that drugs change the way you feel; this is why they are so attractive to young people despite their dangers. Young people also take drugs to feel cool and impress their friends. If your friends all smoke marijuana, you will probably be expected to smoke it, too. If they snort cocaine, they will offer it to you. They may tell you that you are scared or acting like a baby if you don’t want to try it. This push to do what your friends are doing is called peer pressure, and it has a very strong effect on young people who don’t want to appear un cool to their friends. Some kids will do......

Words: 492 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Why Don't We Listen Better?

...Why Don’t We Listen Better?   Practical Book Review: Why Don’t We Listen Better? Communicating & Connecting in Relationships: By: James C. Petersen SUMMARIZE! Why Don’t We Listen Better? Communicating & Connecting in Relationships by James C. Petersen was published in 2007 by Petersen Publications in Portland, Oregon. This is a self-help book that places listening in a juxtaposition relationship with the ability to connect with others in relationships. Starting the reader out Petersen (2007) illustrates the importance of effective communication. Placing emphasis on the need to refrain from allowing emotion to rule what is communicated he recalls incidents that helped him to form his theory of communication, efficiently titled: The Flat-Brain Theory of Emotions. Utilizing single line graphic drawings of a person (from the waist to the head), Petersen (2007) illustrates and differentiate emotional reaction formation from thinking reaction formation. Labeling the origin of reaction as coming from one or more areas of the body he gives consideration to reactions one might have as coming from the stomach (“emotions or feelings” (p. 11)), heart (“concerns, suggestions, and support” (p. 12)), or head (thinking, planning, remembering, reviewing, deciding, [and] rationalizing” (p. 12)) and calls for the reader to make constant observations as to where their reaction(s) might be coming from. Addressing two levels of communication, Petersen (2007) reveals to the reader that......

Words: 1715 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Do We Need Change evolution (gradual development). That is only if we believe that theory is right and consider GOD as a great business man and human as GODS product. So where we are now as human because we have evolved through time. So will it be wrong to say that all the different business evolved on the same principle? That is to make profit. But the businesses which stays for long as market leader are those who constantly innovating .Examples of those companies who once were major leaders are either have been shrunk ,or finished or have lost their identity or catching their tails since then due to not evolving or anticipating a change for future. i.e. DELL, MICROSOFT,WANG LABORATRIES ONCE LEADING FIRMS DISAPPEARED COMPLETELY. An other good example of innovationg is Italian Tractor magnate Ferruccio Lamborghini saw little value in racing cars and As legend has it, Lamborghini presented his concerns to Enzo, who told him to go soak his head, and Ferruccio stormed off, vowing to build a better car. That is a great lesson and a great contrast but there it is normally I tend to say ”impossible is im possible”and Mr Fruruccio proved it. Concluding remarks: so my understanding from the module is that it is very important that if one wants to stay in this competitive market he(business) has to keep on evolving according to the market situation and customer need. A And in doing so making sure that they do not fall into the trap of ignorance Vijay Govindarajan,...

Words: 758 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

This Is How We Do It

...instruments used in Colombia are the Merry Drums, the Maracas, Calling Drums, and the Bass Drums. Flag & what the colors mean The Yellow represents the richness of Colombia. The blue represents the Country’s water wealth. And the red represents the blood of the heroes who died for the country. Must see! Location: Medellin Historical things to see: The History of Colombia has been characterized by the interaction of rival civilian elites Entertainment: Drink, music, dance, film, museums are some of the entertainment in Colombia Transportation: Pretty much the same as the U.S. Cars Weather it is really hot Must see! Location: Cartagena Historical: Entertainment: They dance at any kind of little get to gather and they don’t do anything against each other Transportation: They use the same kind of transportation as the cars In the U.S.A Weather: it is 72˚- 90˚f kind of weather. THE COUNTRY OF COLOMBIA Nombre:Terrance Richardson Fecha y año 10/10/12...

Words: 278 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Dammed If We Do Dammed If We Don’t

... Research Paper Dr.Babaie November 25th 2012 Dammed If We Do Dammed If We Don’t In our everyday lives we rarely think of how we get our drinking water or where it even comes from. If we were to do a little research we would most likely come to the conclusion that it came from, or was in some part due to the use of a dam. Dams are part of everyday life and impact us in more ways than we can even express. First there are the general purposes we all think about: recreation (boating, swimming, etc.), drinking or water for irrigation, and possibly energy production better known as hydroelectric power generation. Yet there are many more active, passive, and even religious ways that dams effect the many cultures, whether effluent or poor; around the globe (Abraham). * Going back to ancient Rome there is mention of retaining and trapping water for public and civil uses. They created the first aqueducts not to far off from the systems many countries still use today to deliver their water for drinking and other public uses, such as filling fountains and using for mill power. It was said that no matter how much of a drought or shortage of water in Rome, the fountains were the last thing to be shut down (public drinking water, even water for the senate was shut off) were the public fountains, to show Rome’s great power and prestige in case of invasion, and for public image also. * Today we live in a much more complicated world. A world filled with people and......

Words: 1684 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Do We Need Government

...Running head: DO WE NEED GOVERNMENT? Do We Need Government? If so, What Should be its Role Abstract The topic of government has always been a large area of conflict. In the following, I will discuss why we need a government and I believe we do need a government. First, do we need government and if so, what role should be its role? I began my paper by addressing these questions by looking at the United States Constitution. “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” People are the ones working alongside government to carry out these mandates stated in this important document. Do We Need Government? If so, What Should be its Role Role of Government In responding to the questions Do we need government? If so, what should be its role?, my answer has to be yes. Thomas Paine’s quote, “Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.” (Paine, 1995) is as true today as it was during the Revolutionary War when he wrote it. In my opinion, we need government and the government needs us, so that Americans can continue to work together with government in harmony, to keep our country growing and developing. Our forefathers escaped to the New......

Words: 1542 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Whe Do We Lie

...because it's so contrary to the world we live in. Can you imagine telling someone you were breaking up with him because of his looks? Or admitting to your boss that you'd read his private e-mails? What about confessing to the days that you're so depressed you stay in bed crying? We don't do that in polite society. If we break up with someone, we tend to think of courteous ways to put it, and if someone asks how we're doing, we respond that we're fine, when in actuality, we'd like to go home and spend quality time with our favorite liquor. In other words, we lie. But why? Why are we so deceitful when we claim with that we value honesty in our interpersonal relationships? To some extent, we can be proud of our lies. Lying is considered a sign of intelligence and cognitive skill, because it takes some aptitude to recognize the way things are and then create and present an alternative to that reality. And it's a skill that we exercise quite a bit; in a study published in the Journal of Basic andApplied Psychology, researchers found that 60 percent of the subjects lied at least once during a videotaped 10-minute conversation [source: Lloyd]. Researchers reported that all the subjects believed they'd been completely truthful during the conversation, so when they watched the playback of the tape, they were amazed to find they'd said deceptive things. The ability to lie and not realize it is a gift unique to humans. Not only do we deceive others, we can trick ourselves into......

Words: 523 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Why Don't We Complain?

...Jordan Swaim 9/21/2014 S/R Why Don’t’ We Complain? In the essay, “Why Don’t We Complain”, written by William F. Buckley Jr., the author explains some situations that he was involved in where no one would complain to fix an uncomfortable situation. He argues that Americans would rather face the inconvenience such as sitting in miserable heat on a train or not having your lunch tray collected on a plane. Buckley writes this essay as a result of constantly finding him accepting the inconvenience of life that could easily be fixed if he were to just speak up. The first theory Buckley stated is that everyone expects someone else to complain instead of them. You can’t go around expecting someone to always do the job for you. You need to speak for yourself. If no one is ever willing to say something, then how is the problem ever going to be solved? I felt that this problem was one if the author’s powerful points in this essay. One example he used, was one day when he was on a train and the temperature was very uncomfortable. It was 85 degrees on the train but below freezing outside. He knew that everyone was suffering from the heat, including himself, but no one ever said anything about the temperature being changed. He then said, “It isn’t just they who have given up trying to rectify irrational vexations” (pg. 77). People always expect someone else to stand up and complain about the situation. The second theory that Buckley explained was that people are afraid to state......

Words: 542 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Fear: Do We Control It?

...Fear: Do We Control It, Or Does It Control Us? TLJ Honors Psych Fear: Do We Control It, Or Does It Control Us? Abstract Fear is the mind's way of responding to both physical and emotional danger. It has vast effects on an individual's psychological state, and is directly controlled by the amygdala. Fear is a necessary defense, because without it we would not protect ourselves from legitimate threats. Traumas and bad experiences can trigger emotional fears. Though it seems nowadays, we play into these fears -- fears that are not at all life threatening-- all too often allowing them to become irrational fears. Since the beginning of time there has always been an instilment of fear in our minds, whether the fear was that of eating the 'Forbidden Fruit' , to local legends like Slenderman, and even the bizarre idea of a robotic coup de' etat. The only difference between these fears, is how strongly we let them affect us psychologically. Do we allow our fears to be spoon-fed to us by society and the media? Are we completely irrational when it comes to some of these fears? What is the correlation between our fears of the past and those of the present? Finally, what will the future of mankind hold? All of these factors play a major part in understanding the affects fear can have on society as a whole. Keywords: Fear, Irrational, Media, Past, Present, Future Fear: Do We Control It, Or Does It Control Us? Since the dawn of......

Words: 4073 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

Why Do We Sleep

...Comp 1 Why do we sleep? Why do we sleep, how is it necessary? It is well known that you have to sleep. If you do not sleep you will die in a week or so. With that being said what does sleep do? We know it makes you feel alert and energized. Is it just evolution at work to keep us out of harm’s way at night? Is sleep our body’s way of conserving energy? Is it a way for our brains to imprint memories, and be creative? Does it clean our brain out? Do we actually need eight hours of sleep? Or is it a mix of a few reasons? Sleep is defiantly an important function in our bodies or we would not get so tired at night we just can’t stay awake. Our brains have a region devoted to letting us know when to sleep it is our biological clock. It knows when we should be awake and when we should sleep and you cannot change it knows that when the sun comes up its time to be awake and a few hours after dark it is time to sleep. But what does sleep do other than have you lay still and have dreams? Is evolution the reason? Are we safer by not hurting ourselves at night or worse getting preyed upon? That fact is debatable. By not moving around you won’t hurt yourself. And the predators will not find you as easily. But there are other things to worry about. What about natural disasters like fires, floods, tornados, and earth quakes? I would think being conscious would be more helpful with these situations even if you are not moving around. So I think we can rule out the evolutionary......

Words: 831 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Ocd: Do We Choose or Are We Programmed?

...Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Do We Choose Or Are We Programmed? Erika Dixon Algonquin College ENL1813 Communications Persuasive Research Essay Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Do We Choose Or Are We Programmed? Sometimes I ask myself, “Where did my OCD Come From?” or, I have a mental breakdown and ask myself, “What am I doing?” Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is unwanted repetitive behaviours and thoughts that torture about 2% of the population (, 2014). Some people are convinced that this behaviour is a choice, and that people with OCD are pretending because they want attention. Although researchers don’t know exactly what causes OCD, they know it’s real, and research is proving that people are subconsciously programmed and nurtured into this behaviour through biology, family history, and life experiences (Canadian Mental Health Association, 2014). Biological factors relating to the possible causes of OCD are an area of considerable research and theory, and it suggests that the brain of a person with OCD has irregular interactions, which makes them have uncontrollable repetitive behaviours and thoughts (, 2014). Biological causes of OCD have focused on a circuit in the brain which regulates primitive aspects of our behaviour such as aggression, sexuality, and bodily excretions (OCD-UK, 2013). When this circuit becomes activated, certain impulses are brought to your attention and cause you to perform a particular behaviour that......

Words: 1240 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

How Do We Know?

...Intro to Philosophy 11 January 2016 How Do We Know? ”How do we know? This is a very intriguing question once you really think about it. How do we acquire knowledge? How do we know something to be true? Is it through experience or does it come from another realm in which we previously inhabited? Is everything we know and will learn in the future already mapped out for us? Throughout history man has sought out to answer these deeper questions and through philosophy they have begun to open their eyes to the universe in which we live. Answering question after question each philosopher perfecting the former theory and all of it leading up to the ultimate question the purpose of life. Epistemology is a form of philosophy that comes from the greek word for knowledge “episteme” and “logos” meaning explanation (chaffee 229) this encompasses the nature of knowledge and justification. It is through epistemology and metaphysics that philosophers attempt to othe answer questions like: can we ever really know anything? what is the difference between belief and knowledge? Can there be different “truths” for different people. or is “truth” the same for all? Pre-socratic philosophers used these ideas to lay the foundation for philosophy as we know it today. Plato, a student of Socrates, and as an ancient Greek philosopher he not only preserved Socrates teachings for future generations but also contributed original ideas on a wide range of issues such as morality, politics, metaphysics......

Words: 1390 - Pages: 6