Capitalism: a Moral and Just System

In: Social Issues

Submitted By sskier
Words 973
Pages 4
Capitalism is the world’s dominant economic system. It can be defined as the unfettered pursuit of profit dependent on the belief that success is attainable to anyone and is based on personal autonomy and responsibility. Its rival, Socialism, involves the sharing of wealth and promotion of equality through increased taxation of the wealthy and redistribution of funds in the form of policy and programs designed to assist in the creation of equality. In theory, Socialism seems to be the most fair and honest of the two ideologies, however in practice this is not the case. Although Capitalism has a reputation of being harsh and corrupt, it is clear that it is the most moral and just economic system.
The equality attained through Socialism would not be possible without the pilfering of funds from the working class. It is a system that condones lethargy and is built on “envy and self-sacrifice” ( ). In contrast, Capitalism a nonpartisan system based on hard-work and an “every man for himself” mindset. This economic system creates ideal citizens, and does not tolerate laziness. Success and wealth is used as an incentive to work hard. In a Capitalist state, freedom is ever-present, and every man has the ability to make his own decisions. Not only is Capitalism beneficial to society, but it is also ideal for the betterment of the economy.
The writings of Karl Marx seem virtuous and honorable at first glance, but when one looks farther into his words, they are not what they seem. “If we have chosen the position in life in which we can most of all work for mankind, no burdens can bow us down, because they are sacrifices for the benefit of all; then we shall experience no petty, limited, selfish joy, but our happiness will belong to millions, our deeds will live on quietly but perpetually at work, and over our ashes will be shed the hot tears of noble people.” ( )…...

Similar Documents


...Capitalism vs. socialism: the great debate revislted October 11 Civics CHV2D1-02 Capitalism versus socialism : the great debate revislted Page1 -debate between two isms, soicalism and capitalism are far from over. -International agencies porvide hard evidenceto discuss these 2 isms -comparisons between before and after the important events of capitalism in Europe and comparison of excommunist countries provide us with enough fact which provides us with definate conclusions -Under communism ->economic decisons/property owned by national/publicly -over the past 15 years of the transition to capitalism-> basic industries taken over by European/Us corporations and by mafia billionaires or have been shut down -In bulgaria, Rumania and some other countries, their average capita growth over the past 15 years -> far below compared to 15 years under communism. -In Armenia, the number of scientific researchers -> 20000 to 5000 in 5 years(1990-1995) Page2 -By the mid 1990s, over 50% of population lived in poverty,homelessness in Russia(Capitalist). Economy = privatized ->taken over by russian gangsters (which was led by billinaire). -the transition to capitalism in russia led to over 15million premature deaths (which would not have happened if they remained as socialism). -intro of capitalism has weaken the system of public health ->caused death/ infectious disease -The big contributor to the AIDS ->russian criminal gangs (trade in heroin......

Words: 366 - Pages: 2


...Of course free-market capitalism is flawed. But it is no worse than socialism or communism or any other man-made societal structure. All systems will fail in time because any system can be abused, and it is human nature to take advantage of such things Capitalism increases our standard of living but not necessarily our morals. However, when we look at Socialist Europe, we see neither morals nor standards of living comparable to the US. We have bigger houses, more cars, take shorter vacations to more exotic places than the Europeans. We don't have full frontal nudity for men and women as is common on European TV and in their movies. We don't have legalized prostitution as in Holland and we don't pay more than half of our incomes for all the free things European get from their governments. But wait... it's all coming to a neighborhood near you and soon. It's not capitalism that is the problem, it's the government's over-involvement in business, corporations and capitalism that is the problem. If you read Farrell's examples they are all caused by the marriage between government and business. Some regulation is necessary, but modern government uses corporations and capitalism as a means to all its ends. For example, healthcare beefs up insurance companies in order to force everyone to buy health insurance and participate in the exchanges. The bailouts provided enormous amounts of money to stabilize car companies and banks, so that people could still borrow money and......

Words: 398 - Pages: 2


...Capitalism and Its Effects “As a result of capitalism, we are increasingly unhappy and dissatisfied, and only by turning against capitalism will we be able to move on.” Peter Saunders cites by Clive Hamilton in his book “Why Capitalism Is Good for the Soul” (8). Capitalism dates back to industrial age. After the industrial revolution, the traditional trade has evolved to a new global platform and some of economic system like capitalism came into prominence. According to Cambridge Dictionary, capitalism is a political and economic system in which a country’s trade is controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. With this system, the numbers of producer increased because of the private owners. Until the last few decades, it seems beneficial and useful breakthrough for humanity but today, increasingly people criticize this system. While Peter Saunders in his article “Why Capitalism Is Good for the Soul” defends that capitalism provide a profitable result for us; Clive Hamilton in his books “Grown Fetish” and “Affluenza”, Annie Leonard in her video “The Story of Stuff” and Tim Kasser in his book “The High Price of Capitalism” claim that capitalism has damaged people in some ways. Although some people argue consumerism provides an easy life and a better world; it actually makes people materialistic and dissatisfied with life, kills people’s free time and damages the plane. With capitalism, people become materialistic and dissatisfied with life. They......

Words: 967 - Pages: 4

Setting Up a Moral System

...What should an effective moral system contain? At this point, I must try to combine what is best in all of the ethical theories and systems (e.g., consequentialist, nonconsequentialist, determinism, altruistism, etc.) I have examined in this course so far to determine a moral position. The hope, then, is that the moral system brings about the greater good and happiness for all concerned. But it is essential to first reflect and analyze the following five attributes that must be present for any moral system to operate and establish stability, order and security: (1) The Value of Life Principle states that human beings should respect life and accept death; (2) The Principle of Goodness or Rightness is ultimate to any moral system, and it requires that human beings attempt to do three things: Promote goodness over badness and do good; cause no harm or badness; and prevent badness or harm; (3) The Principle of Justice or Fairness refers to distributive, meaning that human beings should treat other human beings justly and fairly when attempting to distribute goodness and badness among them; (4) The Principle of Truth Telling or Honesty provides for meaningful communication; and (5) The Principle of Individual Freedom states that people, being individuals with individual differences, must have the freedom to choose their own ways and means of being moral within the framework of the first four basic principles (Thiroux and Krasemann, 158). Accordingly, in Thiroux and......

Words: 423 - Pages: 2


...Do you believe that Capitalism is moral? Justify you answer. Capitalism can be defined ideally as an economic system in which the major portion of production and distribution is in private hands, operating under what is termed a profit or market system. (Shaw et al. 2013, p.118) As compared to other forms of economic systems, capitalism benefits the society in various ways (and based on utilitarian argument, this will be morally preferred because the balance of good over bad is the greatest). Few would deny that capitalism is the most productive and efficient economic system, especially after the collapse of Soviet Communism. But some critics still contend that capitalism is not a moral system. Yet morality is impossible unless one is free to choose between alternatives without outside coercion. Since capitalism is based on freedom of choice, it provides the best environment for morality and character development. In addition, business success not only requires but also rewards virtuous behavior by participants in the market.  A social system such as capitalism is a system of relationships and cannot be moral or immoral in the sense that a person can be – only individuals can be moral agents. However, a social system can be moral in its effects if it promotes the possibility and likelihood of moral behavior by individuals who act within it. It follows, then; that there is a moral imperative to create a political and economic system that permits the greatest......

Words: 1293 - Pages: 6


...Due to the limited resources and unlimited human wants, whole world faces problem of scarcity. Therefore, capitalism is needed to solve these production decision such as what and how to produce the goods and services and distribution decision such as for whom to produce the goods and services. Capitalism is an economic system in which the major portion of production and distribution is in private hands, operating under what is termed a profit or market system. In the country which works on capitalism system, the production and distribution decisions are made by private individuals who are free to pursue their self-interest and their decisions are coordinated and communicated through price signals which also means by profit motive in the market. I believe that the morality of capitalism is debatable, whether the capitalism is moral or immoral have to view it from different sides of perspective. Utilitarianism said that an action is judged as right, good, or wrong on the basis of its consequences. It emphasizes that greatest good for the greatest number of people. In other words, the goods have to be maximized for everyone affected by the decision (Weiss J.W., 2008). When all the costs are added and compared with the results, if the benefits outweigh the costs, then the action may be considered ethical. In a capitalist economic system, individuals have natural rights to property. They can possess, use and dispose the means of production or distribution such as equipment,......

Words: 1390 - Pages: 6


...In his book Economic Justice, Stephen Nathanson lists the first criterion necessary for a just economic system as the need for the well-being of all individuals to be maximized (18). According to Nathanson, the only way that this can be achieved is to have an economic system that is capable of fostering a market with topnotch production output. Producers and consumers only sell and buy for their own benefit and the “invisible hand” applies to the entire economy. If this quality is satisfied, then the market as a whole is improved by the participation of individuals for personal reasons, leading to the highest possible outcome of well-being within the community (19-20). According to Robert Nozick’s philosophy, this would not be an accurate way to decide on the justness of an economic system. He completely disregards the topic of well-being and does not see it applicable to the evaluation of such systems. He views that the only way to attain justice is through ‘voluntary exchanges’ that accompany the individual’s right to free will (Nathanson, 24). This is due to his historical, or procedural, theory of justice. Rather than judging whether an economic system is just by the end result – such as the well-being of citizens – he judges by the process of how individuals come to obtain their belongings (Nathanson, Blackboard). His two theories of ‘entitlement’ and ‘self-ownership’ support this claim, and they will be explained later in this paper. I disagree with this claim of......

Words: 1184 - Pages: 5

1.the Moral Dimensions of Information Systems

...1.The Moral Dimensions of Information Systems The moral dimensions that can control the major ethical and social concerns generated by information systems are as follows: (i) Information Right and Obligation What information rights do individuals and organizations possess with respect to themselves? What can they protect? What obligation do individuals and organization have concerning this information? (ii) Property Rights and Obligations How will traditional intellectual property rights be protected in a digital society in which tracing and accounting forownership is difficult and ignoring such property rights is so easy? (iii) Accounting Liability and Control Determining who should take responsibility for decisions and actions. Many of the laws and court decisions and actions establishing precedents in the area of accountability, liability and control were firmly in place long before information systems were invented. (iv) Quality of System  This has to do with data quality and system errors. As werely more on information systems, data quality issues are gaining more importance. These issues affect you as a consumer and as a user. (v) Quality of Life An interesting quality of life issue that affects more and more people personally is the ability to work from home. Before the advent of information systems most people used to have a regular day job 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m., five days a week in a typical office setting in our society. But with the introduction of......

Words: 609 - Pages: 3


...The Morality of Capitalism 500520316 ENT 527 Ryerson University Dr. Jeffrey Overall Friday, January 23, 2015 Capitalism is a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned. Through the capitalist system, state and economic affairs are completely separated, leaving the government with a single role to protect individual rights against those who pose a threat against others through physical force. Capitalism is diminishing as government regulations of most countries have increased with the intent to gain more revenue through the involvement of business affairs. Therefore, governments are subsidizing businesses through loans, bailouts and tax credits. Although laws and institutions are vital, capitalism is sustained by the more fundamental role played by basic human spirit of independence, initiative, and innovation conducted through entrepreneurship. Capitalism is the only social system that protects the human means of survival which consists of thinking and applying reason to produce material values or creating innovation. Capitalism is a system of freedom where individuals have a choice in work or business to be involved with and the choice to trade with others freely through mutual agreement. Capitalism creates better products, better production and better distribution processes through its system of competition and innovation, resulting in lower costs and prices. An example......

Words: 676 - Pages: 3

Moral Capitalism in the Nfl Lockout

...Moral Capitalism in the NFL lockout When it comes to fights over money, neither pro-football players nor owners are easy to root for. The owners are rich enough to begin with, and the players, though they take part in a violent game that risks their long-term health, are compensated handsomely. To further complicate the legal struggles of billionaires vs. millionaires; both players and owners are competing for human capital by trying to capture the loyalty of the fans. They do this fully aware that the $9 billion dollars they are wrangling over comes from the fans. The same Fans who attend games, buy jerseys, and sit-through television ads. Do this with the expectation that everyone plays by the same rules, and that the game they love, will be back next year. “For many years, the collectively bargained system—which has given the players union enhanced free agency and capped the amount that owners spend on salaries—has worked enormously well for the NFL, for NFL players, and for NFL fans.” Goodell’s first argument is clear, that the status quo has worked out “enormously well” for every party involved. Unfortunately this argument is problematic, given that it was actually the NFL whom decided to opt out of the collective bargaining agreement (CBA). In 2008 the Owners voted unanimously to exit the CBA after the 2010 season, even though the 2006 extension would have been valid through the 2012 season. The Owners shortened the deal by two years because they believed the......

Words: 2428 - Pages: 10

Just in Time System

...reported for large firms. REFERENCES Finch, B. J. (1986), "Japanese Management Techniques in Small Manufacturing Companies: A Strategy for Implementation," Production and Inventory Management 27 (3rd Quarter), 30-38. Hannah, K. H. (1987), "Just-In-Time: Meeting the Competitive Challenge," Production and Inventory Management 28 (3rd Quarter), 16-21. Journal of Small Business Management Hutchins, D. (1986), "Having a Hard Time," Fortune (June 9), 64^6. Manoochehri, G. H. (1988), "JIT for Small Manufacturers," Journal of Small Business Management 26 (October), 22-30. Newman, R. G. (1988), "The BuyerSupplier Relationship Under JustIn-Time," Production and Inventory Management29 (3rd Quarter), 45-49. O'Neal, C. (1987), "The Buyer-Seller Linkage in a Just-In-Time Environment," Journal of Purchasing and Material Management 23, 7-13. Schonberger, R. J. (1986), World Class Manufacturing. New York: Free Press. Sonfield, M. C. (1984), "Can Japanese Management Techniques Be Applied to American Small Business?" Journal of Small Business Management 22 (July), 18-23. Stokes, C. R. (1989), "JIT: Will Suppliers Embrace Their New Roles?" Business (April-June), 37-40. Warne, J. (1986), Just-In-Time Production System. McDonnell-Douglas, Video Training Course Hand Book. Copies of articles from this publication are now available from the UMI Article Clearinghouse. For more information about the Clearinghouse, please fill out and mail back the coupon......

Words: 3025 - Pages: 13


...Capitalism can be defined ideally as an economic system in which the major portion of production and distribution is in private hands, operating under what is termed a “profit” or “market” system. Socialism is an economic system characterized by public ownership of property and a planned economy. Capital, as an economic concept, is closely related to private property. When traditional restraints are removed from the sale of goods and from wages and when all individuals have equal access to raw materials and markets the doctrine of laissez faire, from the French meaning “to let people do as they choose”. Oligopolies—a concentration of property and resources, and thus economic power, in the hands of a few. Corporation—an artificial being, Invisible, intangible, and existing only in the contemplation of law. Limited liability is a key feature of the modern corporation. Consumer sovereignty: the idea that consumers should and do control the market through their purchases. Dependence effect: as a society becomes increasingly affluent, wants are increasingly created by the process by which they are satisfied. Moral vegetarians are people who reject the eating of meat on moral grounds. 2 In my opinion, Wal-Mart is an example of a morally bad corporation. There are three reasons to improve that: (1) Unfair competition. Our textbook describe it like this: “Some critics of capitalism maintain that capitalism breeds oligopolies that eliminate competition and......

Words: 1707 - Pages: 7

Moral Systems

...Moral Systems Ethics A workable set of standards for morality should always include several assumptions. Among these assumptions is that it should be rational, and not without emotion. It should also be as logical as possible. Stability and consistency are also important factors. These ideas should also pertain to all individuals. Because these are beliefs, these ideas should also be taught. Whether or not people grasp the idea, the moral theory should be discussed and be able to be understood. The last requirement of a workable set of standards is it must be able to resolve issues, duties, and obligations among the people. There should be an explanation how individuals can choose the action that will be most moral. Ethics are moral principles that govern an individual or group’s behavior. It is a philosophical treatment of the moral order. The two different approaches to ethics include scientific or philosophical. The sources of ethics stem from experience, as well as principles taught through discipline. For example most parents teach you from the start it is wrong to hurt others, steal, lie, etc. Many people are also influenced through theology. For example, “Thou shall not kill”, this is the sixth commandment in the Bible’s Old Testament at Exodus, Chapter 20. Even though there has been an effort to make morality independent of religion, many religions include basic moral principles. There is a natural law when it comes to ethics. “Do good and avoid evil”, “Lead a...

Words: 885 - Pages: 4

Changes in Just in Time Systems

...The advent of technology and globalization has increased the potential for earning higher profits for businesses, but at the same time it has also escalated competition and the pressure to perform better, faster and at a lower cost. In order to survive, companies are forced to find innovative ways to cut costs and establish effective supply chains to reduce their overheads. Using the Toyota pioneered Just In Time (JIT) analogy, which emphasizes the need to have just the required parts, quantities and time needed for production and distribution. Using JIT, Toyota, Boeing, Dell and HP have substantially reduced their warehousing and work in process costs. Over the past decade, JIT has transformed from a manufacturing methodology to a profound manufacturing organizational model. However, by stretching supply chains globally, as pointed out by Evans, 2011 companies are exposed to greater catastrophe because they outsource many parts of their business to suppliers or service companies thousands of miles away. If any one link in the supply chain goes wrong, it can have a huge impact on the returns. This increased fragility of supply chains can be observed with the factors mentioned below. One of the main principles of JIT is centered on reducing waste. Auto manufacturers started using common parts across multiple product lines and consolidated suppliers in order to procure parts in greater scale. These practices helped reduce waste, but also introduced risk. If any of these......

Words: 823 - Pages: 4

Ethical Conflicts at Enron: Moral Responsibility in Corporate Capitalism

...INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO Y DE ESTUDIOS SUPERIORES DE MONTERREY MAESTRÍA EN ADMINISTRACIÓN EMPRESARIAL (MGN) Materia: ECONOMÍA PARA LA TOMA DE DECISIONES Caso: Ethical Conflicts at Enron: Moral Responsibility in Corporate Capitalism Pregunta 1: En el caso de Enron y las acciones que llevaron a su colapso, ¿podría decirse que se trató de problemas de agencia? Justifique su respuesta a partir de los conceptos de principal/agent y la información proporcionada en el caso. Respuesta: Con respecto a lo abordado dentro del caso que nos ocupa y tomando en cuenta los factores que llevaron al colapso a ENRON considero que efectivamente se trató de un problema de agencia, lo que sucedió con esta firma. Según su definición un problema “principal/agent” o de agencia se da cuando los objetivos de los agentes (en el caso de Enron, los altos ejecutivos) son diferentes a los del dueño o dueños (en este caso los accionistas de Enron), y es difícil o muy costo para el dueño monitorear al agente para que se cumplan los objetivos del dueño, que como ya lo hemos estudiado debe de ser maximizar las ganancias de la empresa. Como lo apunta nuestro caso de estudio, la firma Enron “tenía una tendencia por contratar solo a los mejores y más brillantes y los recompensaba como estrellas de rock mientras al mismo tiempo ellos demandaban que “innovaban, innovaban, innovaban””, esto apunta a que claramente los objetivos de estos ejecutivos estaban sumamente alejados de su principal deber......

Words: 1021 - Pages: 5