Autocratic Management

In: Business and Management

Submitted By jaggie37
Words 2204
Pages 9
Management Essay on Autocratic Leadership
Are you struggling with your management essay?
Worried you won't gain the grade you require, bringing down the standard of your degree?
You don't understand what you're studying – shouldn't you get help? Is it worth failing and wasting all the time and money you spent on your course?
Your essay may be difficult but don't let it get you down or stressed - let us help you!
Our team of 4,000+ qualified professional experts – many of who practice as business analysts, finance directors and management consultants – are waiting to write your essay for you. Just send us your essay question, tell us when you need it for, and sit back – we guarantee the quality, originality and delivery time of the work so you have nothing to worry about.
Trust us, trust our guarantees and trust our 4,000+ qualified experts to help you with your management essay!
Management essay on autocratic leadership
An autocratic leader will always be successful in an organization.
What is autocratic leadership?
Leadership is, writes Shackleton (1995), about recognizing a goal and having the motivational power to influence a group towards achieving that goal. Successful leadership therefore means that this goal is achieved by the leader and their group. There are many different means and styles of leadership, one of which is by autocratic means. Autocratic leadership is based upon an approach whereby the manager retains the maximum amount of power that they can. All decisions are derived from this leader and no consultation takes place. We shall examine the applicability of an autocratic leadership style in contemporary organizations and also look at some alternative styles.
Autocratic leadership
Is a more traditional and classical approach to management relying upon threats and punishment to influence its employees. – Something which Beardwell and…...

Similar Documents

Facing Autocratic and Participatory Polarities

...Senior Managers, Global Computer Solutions From: Lynette K. Lee, Vice President of Human Resources Date: October 5, 2012 Subject: Polarity Management: Autocratic vs. Participatory Management You’ve heard the term polar opposites it is used to describe objects, situations, or even people that are very different. North and South poles; yin and yang, dark and light are just a few of the hundreds of phrases used to illustrate polar opposites and their distinct differences. The term polar opposites are often used to brand or categorize things we like or good things versus things we don’t like or bad things. Polarities are persistent issues that are inevitable and unsolvable. The issues or conflicts seem very diverse, but operate at the same time. Sometimes a manager will experience a “damned if I do, damned if I don’t feeling, that is when you have a polarity. Polarity management has been around since early 1975 and continues to be a challenge to companies today. Polarities consist of two interdependent opposites that have two or more answers (Johnson, 1998). Polarities are two issues or conflicts on two far reaching ends of the spectrum, which have no reasonable solution. Each spectrum or pole has advantages as well as disadvantages (Noll, 2002). It is very important to recognize instances of polarity in management situations. If one pole is underlined or a solution is developed it leaves the other pole unresolved thus starting a vicious cycle. The value......

Words: 526 - Pages: 3

Management

...The most commonly held views or theories are discussed below and have been developed over the last 100 years or so. Unfortunately these theories do not all reach the same conclusions! Taylor Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856 – 1917) put forward the idea that workers are motivated mainly by pay. His Theory of Scientific Management argued the following: Workers do not naturally enjoy work and so need close supervision and control Therefore managers should break down production into a series of small tasks Workers should then be given appropriate training and tools so they can work as efficiently as possible on one set task. Workers are then paid according to the number of items they produce in a set period of time- piece-rate pay. As a result workers are encouraged to work hard and maximise their productivity. Taylor’s methods were widely adopted as businesses saw the benefits of increased productivity levels and lower unit costs. The most notably advocate was Henry Ford who used them to design the first ever production line, making Ford cars. This was the start of the era of mass production. Taylor’s approach has close links with the concept of an autocratic management style (managers take all the decisions and simply give orders to those below them) and Macgregor’s Theory X approach to workers (workers are viewed as lazy and wish to avoid responsibility). However workers soon came to dislike Taylor’s approach as they were only given boring, repetitive tasks to carry out and......

Words: 4655 - Pages: 19

Management

...360 feedback (445) A accommodation (453) Active listening (442) Agreeableness (382) Arbitration (456) Attitude (384) Attribution error (448) Authentic leadership (343) Authoritarianism (383) Authority decision (335) Autocratic style (331) Automation (388) Avoidance (453) B argaining zone (456) Batna (455) Brainstorming (425) C entralized communication network (420) Channel richness (444) Charismatic leader (337) Coercive power (325) Cognitive dissonance (384) Cohesiveness (419) Collaboration (453) Committee (409) Communication (437) Communication channel (437) Competition (453) Compressed workweek (393) Compromise (453) Conflict (451) Conflict resolution (452) Conscientiousness (382) Consultative decision (336) Contingency workers (396) Credibility (438) Cross-functional team (409) D ecentralized communication network (420) Decision making (422) Democratic style (331) Distributive negotiation (455) Dysfunctional conflict (451) E ffective communication (437) Effective team (413) Efficient communication (438) Emotional conflict (451) Emotional intelligence (339) Emotional stability (382) Employee involvement (410) Empowerment (327) Ethical leadership (341) Ethnocentrism (447) Expectancy (361) Expert power (326) Extinction (364) Extrinsic reward (351) Extroversion (382) F eedback(443) Filtering (442) Flexible working hours (394) Formal group (408) Functional conflict (451) G roup decision......

Words: 456 - Pages: 2

Mark Zuckerberg as Autocratic Leadership?

...The man who founded the company in his Harvard dorm room in 2004 is now its CEO, chairman of the board and controlling shareholder. In its regulatory filing, Facebook credits Mr. Zuckerberg with the vision to create what has become the largest social network on Earth. But as Facebook changes into a public company, its 27-year-old founder will still have final say over all major decisions, largely unchallengeable by investors or the board of directors. In my study of organizational behaviour, I have yet to come across one who was considered great who did not also have a significant body count of ex-employees claiming that they were autocratic and mean. Examples include Jack Welch, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and Larry Ellison. My theory is that the level of personal demanding needed to drive a global enterprise to a position of world-changing leadership is one that can be too much for some people. Such leaders do not tend to provide much in the way of emotional coddling and Mark Zuckerberg is like that. If your confidence in your own abilities is self-generated and emotionally secure, and you are seeking someone who will pose to you ever-greater challenges to surmount, then Mark Zuckerberg is a pretty good fit for you. However, he is not there to develop you because that is your own job. Following Facebook's initial public offering, Mr. Zuckerberg will continue to own the majority of the company's voting shares. He will also own the largest single stake of the company as......

Words: 600 - Pages: 3

Management

...like to think it was but have to admit an element of good luck has accompanied me thorough my career, When I discuss my career I am discussing my life, I was born and I am here. I am on a journey I really do believe this and buy in to Donald Supers theory of life long learning. Careers have been viewed variously as a sequence of positions occupied by a person during the course of a lifetime (Super, 1957), I am 38 and have matured and developed through many stages, entering new stages and having less time for older tasks. I am in a mixed stage of establishment/exploration at present within my professional role, I am learning new skills and understanding what skills are required, in preparedness to develop to the next level of senior management. The transition may never happen but if it does I want to be ready. “Me Incorporated" tack (Hesketh, 2000). In my personal life I am struggling to juggle parenting and self development like this course with new hobbies I would like to pursue. Super descries emotional involvement in the life stages as being very influential and I can relate to this in my pursuit to develop myself in to the next role up the ladder I have taken knocks that have forced me to revaluate the merit of my aspirations. In supers life span-life space approach model decision points are graphically displayed they normally appear when entering a new life role for example when joining a new employer or becoming a parent, or when experiencing a knock to my......

Words: 1364 - Pages: 6

Biography of an Autocratic Lefty

...Biography of an Autocratic Lefty Allister Von Crane was born and raised in a small town in Germany. His father and mother were the son and daughter of two different political leaders; he had one sister who died at child birth leaving him an only child. Allister was always brought up to be a tough man and moreover he adopted the character from his parents’ lifestyle who were atheist. Allister was home schooled and his parents were also of a wealthy background. (The Von in Allister’s name was a sign of aristocracy). Allister was born in 1906, when his Grandfather ruled as one of the most powerful dictators in history of Germany. Being that Alister was the only Grandson. His grandfather brought him up in a way so that one day he would take his seat as a dictator and ruler of Germany, when he was no longer able to carry on his task. Just as his Grandfather was a warlord and was feared by all his colleges Allister was feared even more. In 1931 when his grandfather died Allister took over his grandfather position of leader at a tender age of twenty –five. Not only was he the youngest authoritarian leader ever to rule over Germany but he was also the worst in his time. He didn’t value Christianity; he made the economy sore by all means, as was always ready to punish anyone who defies his authority. His army was one of the biggest in the world and Crane had more than enough weapon of destruction to go into bloody battle with any country that questioned his authority. Growing...

Words: 841 - Pages: 4

Management

...Natasha Murray Professor Romary Intro. To Leadership Chapter 1 Review Questions 1. Why is leadership important? Leadership is important because it can make or break a company. Management and leadership go hand in hand when it comes to individuals and organizations including financial performance. Managerial leadership is crucial to creating effective organizations with employees who push their limits. 2. What are the five key elements in our leadership definition? How do the elements interrelate to form this definition? The five key elements of leadership are influence, leader-followers, organizational objectives, people, and change. When it comes to the leader-follower element, leaders and followers influence each other. This relationship leads to the next element that is influence where the leader uses power, politics, and negotiating to sway followers on their opinions. In order for a manager to be effective, they need to influence their employees by communicating ideas to gain acceptance. Then motivate their employees to support and implement the idea at hand through change. in order for a company to stay relevant in the ever changing economy, they need to continuously change with technology, theories, and such. And in doing so, a company’s organizational objectives are met through the same vision shared by employees. Effective leaders motivate employees to think outside the box and push their limits all while keeping in mind what is best for the......

Words: 2499 - Pages: 10

Management

...started his career in programming personal computer at a very young age of 13. He is an instinctive innovator and entrepreneur. He is very focused in his vision which made his company a market leader in software industry (Gates, 1995). As a leader his leadership style quite different which has a mixture of autocratic, visionary and participative approaches. He is actively involved in technology development for new products and in making various strategic decisions. He spends most of his time for staying touch with customers and employees around the world. He expects his managers to have their own personal influence and to take decisions assuming they are the CEO of the organization which showed the participative leadership style. He met his managers regularly to discuss the business strategy. The technology and innovation in the organization is completely decided by Bill Gates where the managers do not possess any role which shows a slight autocratic style. The future for the follower (customer) is decided by Bill Gates who lets us move forward with technology which shows visionary style of leadership (Lowe, 2001). The leadership style of Steve Jobs is an autocratic style. He did not follow a consultative approach (Dym & Hu, 2005). He expected his staff to excel and he criticized their performance bluntly (Sarah, 2011). He also showed visionary style of leadership. He had career set bach at 1985 which contributed him to develop knowledge and skills about......

Words: 3050 - Pages: 13

Autocratic Leadership Style

...those they are responsible for. With that being said, an autocratic leadership style is an authoritarianism, where only one person has the right, and have total control of their company, workers, followers, or country. Their decisions is follow by the “golden rule” and should never be question or defied in anyway or shape perform. They plan and analyze everything allowing them with the ability to subordinate any work involved and apply their own rules The first advantage of an autocratic leadership is that it is effective in emergency situations. They also, work optimistically during difficulty and demanding situations. Specially, when circumstances ascend in a company or an organization. While the majority of individuals fail to distinguish or reach a solution. Therefor having an autocratic leader during tough situations is great, because he/she will take control and action in his/her own hands and will encourage the personnel or employees to move forward. For instance, Martha Stewart flourished in a competitive market in which she constructed her company with personal attention to every detail. Whether her employees like it or not, she was conscientious and dictatorial. She attained wealth and position her endeavor, and she applied her autocratic management style. Having one autocratic person to direct or lead with authority the mission can lead to success (Autocratic). On the other hand, the downsides of an autocratic leadership can be challenging. This kind of leaders......

Words: 615 - Pages: 3

Management

...Classical Management Theory (1900 – 1930) It was the rise of the Industrial Revolution and factories were becoming more common. Inside these factories, managers were constantly look for ways to improve productivity and efficiency. As time moved on, it became apparent that searching for the single best way to do things was the most important thing for managers to do. Thus, classical management theory was born. The Evolution of Classical Management Theory The Industrial Revolution was a time where innovation really began to change the way that products were produced and sold. The invention of machines to produce goods in the 19th century drastically improved productivity, which in turn lowered the cost to the consumer. The lower price resulted in a greater demand for products and thus a greater need for more factories and workers. As factories increased in number, managers continued to search for ways to improve productivity, lower cost, increase quality of their products, improve employee/manager relationships and increase efficiency. The focus shifted from using machines to increase productivity to how they could increase employee productivity and efficiency. When they did this, they began to notice some new problems inside their factory systems. Employees were dissatisfied with their current working conditions, and many lacked the necessary training for how to do their work efficiently. Managers then began to formulate and test possible solutions, one of which was to find...

Words: 952 - Pages: 4

Management

...Participative Management One of the most important assets in a business is human capital. The potential success of a company relay on its employees from top to bottom of its hierarchical structure. A company needs to achieve maximum output out of its employees both physically and intellectually. Employees tends to give more output when they are motivated. A successful organization can generally trace its success to motivated employees. One of the methods for motivating the employees is employee involvement. Participative management is also known as participative decision making or employee involvement or industrial democracy. In participative management, stakeholders at all organizational levels are invited for the analysis of the problems, development of strategies, and implementation of solutions. The employees are encouraged to take part in decision making process of the firm by participating in the activities like goal setting, work schedule determination and suggestion making. Apart from involving employees in the decision making process, it treats their ideas and suggestions with due respect and consideration. Employee ownership of the company is the most extensive form of participative management. Participative management helps to improve work practices, organizational performance and productivity. It encourages its employees to play important roles in the organization and to convey their ideas and messages to the mangers or to the top level. It is regarded as a......

Words: 1517 - Pages: 7

Management

...pharmaceutical market. * Complete overhaul of executive board with 10 executives replaced * Acquisition and Mergers Discussing more on the second-order change, a transformational change happened when the organization switched from entrepreneurial to become a wider and more professional management kind of structure when they begun to purchase local subsidiaries in foreign market in order for their sales agent (new position) to introduce their product outside of Switzerland. Another transformational change that happen involves the visionary changes that make the organization change in terms of involving in other fields of business through product d1versification through: i. Production of chocolate with the ingredients of Swiss General Chocolate Factory ; ii. Created new product like malted milk, powdered beverage and powdered bottled milk ; iii. Production of coffee products ; iv. Merged with Maggi seasoning and soup manufacturers ; v. Entered cosmetic arena thus becoming the major shareholder of L’Oreal ; vi. Involved in producing pharmaceutical and ophthalmic products. During the course change, the company applied some “mid-management change theory” without destroying employee’s loyalty, impression, motivation, self belongingness and positive behaviours. Lastly, acquisitions and mergers was also a big part of Nestlé’s second order type of change. This provided them accelerated growth (but other critics had viewed it......

Words: 2970 - Pages: 12

Management

...Management Practice and Theory Student’s name: Instructor’s Name: Class Name and Code: University: Date of Submission: TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………… iii Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………. 4 Organisation Effectiveness ……………………………………………………………. 5 Team Effectiveness …………………………………………………………………… 6 Management Theories ……………………………………………………………….... 8 Command and Control ………………………………………………………………… 9 Scientific Management ……………………………………………………………….. 10 Bureaucratic Organisation ……………………………………………………………. 11 Subordination to Community ………………………………………………………… 11 Management as a discipline ………………………………………………………….. 12 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………… 12 References …………………………………………………………………………... 13 Executive summary A professional manager will acknowledge the contribution of team effectiveness to overall organizational success. Teams will often require leaders to ensure delegation and coordination of group activities for a team to attain the desirable results. This paper seeks to establish influence of management theories on a professional manager both at team and organisation level. The management theory adopted by a leader will determine their style of leadership thus their relationship with employees and other key stakeholders. Introduction A team is a small group of workers with complimentary expertise who share common goals whereby group interests precede over individual interest. Teamwork is essential in......

Words: 2903 - Pages: 12

Management

...Management can be described as ‘getting things done through people'. This means that there must be a manager to control and motivate these people or human resources. While there are many different styles of managers and management techniques the management theories are most important. Management theories describe certain behaviours that are renowned for achieving the goals of the business. The four main management theories are classical-scientific, behavioural, political and contingency. These all have various styles, outcomes and have many similarities and differences when put into practice in a business environment. The Classical-Scientific theories of management developed in the late 19th and early 20th Century. Most of the workforce was inexperienced and uneducated so they had little managing experience. Democracy was not fully developed so as a result most owners and managers ruled with an ‘iron hand' and rarely consulted employees. Though from these roots many different management techniques and styles sprouted which would form the basis of management today. These include Hierarchical structure of organisation, Division of Labour, and Autocratic and Authority styles of management. Hierarchical structure of organisation is the tradition form of organising a business. This can be best displayed in a shape of a pyramid, with the owner, CEO or Board of Directors at the top. This top level of management is concerned with planning organising and controlling. They are......

Words: 1213 - Pages: 5

Management

...work with leader who are truly confident’, people tend to trust others more when they appear confident. In fact, confidence does not mean arrogance, it just helps a leader to make decision, communicate with others, coach team members, and lead meetings. How a person can lead a group or a team without first believes in himself or herself? It is suggested that without confidence, there is no leadership (Francisco Dao 2008). How successful a leader can be judged base on how that person behave. The definition clearly says that leadership is an influencing process to reach a common goal. So a leader’s style and behaviors can affect the followers’ performances. There are 2 leadership styles found by University of Iowa in 1930s: autocratic and democratic. Autocratic style has leaders that make the decisions and ask the employees to do the work, while the democratic leaders will ask the employees to participate in decisions making, work together and sort things out by themselves. Base on the research of Ohio State University, the behaviors is tend to focus on getting the task done or developing relationships. There is not a common theory about leadership, researchers are still looking for a better understanding of leadership. Managers have to do more than just asking people to do things, there are basically four functions of a manager known as planning, organizing, leading and controlling. For non-leader people, they only see controlling and leading, but they do not know managers......

Words: 2122 - Pages: 9