Ac 553 You Decide Week 4 Bem Tax Services Memo to John and Jane

In: Business and Management

Submitted By nerdypupil
Words 745
Pages 3
AC 553 YOU DECIDE WEEK 4 BEM TAX SERVICES MEMO TO JOHN AND JANE
To purchase this visit here: http://www.nerdypupil.com/product/ac-553-you-decide-week-4-bem-tax-services-memo/ Contact us at: nerdypupil@gmail.com AC 553 YOU DECIDE WEEK 4 BEM TAX SERVICES MEMO TO JOHN AND JANE
AC 553 You Decide Week 4 BEM Tax Services
BEM Tax Services
Memo
To: John and Jane Smith
From: Benedict Mitchell
Date: [ 10/7/2011 ]
Re: Tax Issues
Upon reviewing the information you submitted to me concerning your taxes, they were several issues which I observed.
First I will like to discuss John’s issues:
* The $300,000 will have to be treated as ordinary employment income, subject to federal and state income taxes.
* The $25,000 will have to be treated as an expense.
* I have determined that you have to account for all qualified business expenses and only net income will be taxable.
AC 553 You Decide Week 4 BEM Tax will provide a detailed memo that has been written to John and Jane Smith regarding the several issues of taxation.
AC 553 YOU DECIDE WEEK 4 BEM TAX SERVICES MEMO TO JOHN AND JANE
To purchase this visit here: http://www.nerdypupil.com/product/ac-553-you-decide-week-4-bem-tax-services-memo/ Contact us at: nerdypupil@gmail.com AC 553 YOU DECIDE WEEK 4 BEM TAX SERVICES MEMO TO JOHN AND JANE
AC 553 You Decide Week 4 BEM Tax Services
BEM Tax Services
Memo
To: John and Jane Smith
From: Benedict Mitchell
Date: [ 10/7/2011 ]
Re: Tax Issues
Upon reviewing the information you submitted to me concerning your taxes, they were several issues which I observed.
First I will like to discuss John’s issues:
* The $300,000 will have to be treated as ordinary employment income, subject to federal and state income taxes.
* The $25,000 will have to be treated as an expense.
* I have determined that you have to account for all qualified business expenses and only net…...

Similar Documents

Fed Taxes You Decide- Week 4

...AC 553 W4 – You decide Will Penny Memo dated 9/30 John and Lisa, There many considerations to each of your tax questions. Please find them outlined below. One: $300,000 influx (fee) from lawsuit IRS Sec. 7701 states your LLC will be taxed as a partnership unless you elect to be taxed as a corporation. Since it is advantageous to you to be taxed as a partnership (pass through income versus tax on dividends), I will need to verify your LLC has been accepted by the IRS as a partnership. Code Sec. 448 permits that a LLC can be cash based for tax purposes. The alternative is electing to be accrual based. This is important as to the timing of your income from the law suit. The $300,000 will constitute income in this subject tax year if you are cash based since this is when you received it. However, under accrual method, you could have billed for services over the two years and the “right to receive” that income would be included in the tax year when the bill was created and sent to the client. As of right now, it looks like the $300,000 will be counted as income for this subject tax year. Next, let’s look at your expenses. Two: $25,000 as income? As we just discussed, the timing of expenses will vary depending on cash based versus accrual based accounting method. Since we are going to assume and verify that you are cash based, the $25,000 in expenses paid up front will not reduce your income in this subject year and the $25,000 received will be counted as......

Words: 1517 - Pages: 7

You Decide - Jane and John Smith Tax Advice

...AC553 – You Decide 1. John Tax Issues: a. How is the $300,000 treated for purposes of Federal tax income? The $300,000 is included in John’s Gross Income. Section 61 of the IRS Tax code generally defines gross income as all income from whatever source derived, including the compensation for services, fees, commissions, fringe benefits and similar items. Therefore the $300,000 is classified as compensation John received for legal services rendered. b. How is the $25,000 treated for purposes of Federal tax income? The $25,000 should also be included in gross income, as they are also included in the fees for the legal services) provided. c. What is your determination regarding reducing the taxable amount of income for both a and b In order for John to reduce the taxable amount of his income of $300,000, he must maximize his deductions as business expenses. Business expenses are the cost of carrying on a trade or business. Expenses are usually deductible if the business is operated to make a profit. The tax code Section 162- Trade or business expenses indicates for a business expenses to be deductible, it must be both ordinary and necessary. An ordinary expense is one that is common and accepted in the business, while a necessary expense is one that is helpful and appropriate for the business. The other requirements for an expense to be deductible as a business expense include, it being reasonable in amount and practice; an expense is......

Words: 1511 - Pages: 7

Acct553 You Decide Week 4

...Memo |To: |Mr. & Mrs. John Smith | |From: |----------, CPA | |CC: |---------------------- | |Date: |May , 2013 | |Re: |YOU DECIDE, WEEK 4 | John Smith Tax Concern 1(a): The issue is the $300,000 in income for John’s fees. How to treat this in Federal Income Tax? In reading Cornell University Law School (as much of this memo comes from) referencing the IRS code, Section 61(a), the code the concept of income is broad and general. Gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items: (1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items; (2) Gross income derived from business; (3) Gains derived from dealings in property; (4) Interest; (5) Rents; (6) Royalties; (7) Dividends; (8) Alimony and separate maintenance payments; (9) Annuities; (10) Income from life insurance and endowment contracts; (11) Pensions; (12) Income from discharge of indebtedness; (13) Distributive share of partnership gross income; (14) Income in respect of a decedent; and (15) Income from an interest in an estate or trust. (I.R.C § 61) My investigation of this leads me to conclude that Section 61(a) basically says......

Words: 3272 - Pages: 14

Week 4 - You Decide

...Memo To: John and Jane Smith From: Alyssa Webster Date: [ 2/2/2014 ] Re: Memo summarizing various tax issues 1. John Smith's Tax Issues Issue (a): How is the $300,000 treated for purposes of federal tax income? Applicable Law and Analysis Code Section 61(a) lists fifteen items that must be included in gross income. Number 1 on this list is compensation for services including fees, commission, fringe benefits and similar items. Number 2 is gross income derived from business (¶4301, reference 1). This is important because the $300,000 was a fee received as compensation for service as a lawyer. Also, as a lawyer, fees received are income derived from business. Compensation for services is taxed when received (under cash basis) and at fair market value (¶4315, reference 1). This means the $300,000 is taxed in the year it is received and at the full value since the fair value of cash is the value at the time of transaction. Conclusion Based on Code Section 61(a) it is understood that the fee that is paid is compensation for the services performed by Mr. Smith and also part of his gross income from business. It is assumed that Mr. Smith will be reporting his taxes as a cash basis tax payer. Since this is the case, the full value of the $300,000 is taxed as gross income from last year (when it was received). Issue (b): How is the $25,000 treated for purposes of federal tax income? Applicable Law and Analysis Code Section 61(a) lists fifteen......

Words: 3320 - Pages: 14

Acct 553 - You Decide

...Memo To: John and Jane Smith From: Date: [ 3/22/2014 ] Re: Memo summarizing various tax issues 1. John Smith's Tax Issues Issue (a): How is the $300,000 treated for purposes of federal tax income? Applicable Law and Analysis As the $300,000 you received this year from the jury award is considered compensation, it has to be included as part of your gross income per Code Sec 61(a)(1), which clearly states that gross income is “all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items: compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits and similar items.” (http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rr-07-19.pdf), Additionally, IRC section 451(a) states “the amount of any item of gross income shall be included for the taxable year in which received by the taxpayer, unless under the method of accounting use in computing taxable income, such amount is to be properly accounted for as of a different period.” (http://www.irs.gov/irb/2011-05_IRB/ar08.html#d0e1606) Conclusion As you prepare your taxes per IRC section 451(a), you must include the $300,000 in compensation as part of your gross taxable income per Code Sec 61(a)(1). As there was no way to know the compensation amount prior to the jury judgment, you could not have used the accrual method of accounting for the previous years in which you worked on this case. Issue (b): How is the $25,000 treated for purposes of federal tax income? Applicable Law and......

Words: 1932 - Pages: 8

Ac553 Week 4 You Decide

...AC553 You Decide Week 4 John and Jane Smith Tax issues and recommendation 1. John Smith Tax Issues: 1(a) How is the $300,000 treated for purposes of Federal Income Tax? Since the $300,000 was derived from a business activity the amount should be included in the Gross Income reported for the John Smith LLC (IRS Regulation 1.61-3(a)). The assumption is being made that none of the income has been reported previously and that the LLC using a cash basis accounting method (IRS Publication 334). Because the income is reported in the LLC the income will also be reduced by all appropriate Cost of Goods Sold relevant to the business activity. The deductions from income will follow the guidelines relating to IRS Code Sections 62, 162 and 212 which focus on clarifying that the expenses are reasonable and that they are necessary for the performance of the business activity. Once the applicable deductions and credits (including any Net Operating Loss carry forward amounts) have been realized from a tax perspective at the business level the Net Income from the business will flow through to the personal income level where it will be taxed at the marginal tax rate of the individual. Summary: The $300,000 will be reported as gross income for the business LLC (IRS Regulation 1.61-3(a)), which will then be reduced by the appropriate Cost of Goods Sold and any applicable Tax Credits (IRS Code Sections 62, 162 and 212). At that point the Net Income from the business will......

Words: 1524 - Pages: 7

You Decide Week 4

...Memo To: John & Jane Smith From: Date: 3/28/2015 Re: Summary of various tax issues (1) John Smith's Tax Issues: (a) How is the $300,000 treated for purposes of federal tax income? Applicable Law & Analysis: Conclusion: (b) How is the $25,000 treated for purposes of federal tax income? Applicable Law & Analysis: Conclusion: (c) What is your determination regarding reducing the taxable amount of income for both (a) and (b) above? Applicable Law & Analysis: Conclusion: (d) Do I get better tax benefits for paying the lease on office space or for buying the building? What are the differences? Applicable Law & Analysis: Conclusion: (2) Jane Smith Tax Issues: (a) What are the different tax consequences between paying down the mortgage debt and assuming a new mortgage debt for federal income tax purposes? Applicable Law & Analysis: Conclusion: (b) Can John and Jane Smith utilize a 1031 tax exchange to buy a more expensive house using additional money from John's case? Applicable Law & Analysis: Conclusion: (c) Does Jane have a business or hobby? Why is this distinction important? Applicable Law & Analysis: Conclusion: (d) Would Jane (and John) realize better tax benefits if she had a separate business for her jewelry making activities? Applicable Law & Analysis: Conclusion: (e) What tax benefits would John realize if he invested $15,000 in Jane's jewelry......

Words: 275 - Pages: 2

Acct 553 Week 6 Assignment: You Decide

...ACCT 553 Week 6 Assignment: You Decide Purchase here http://chosecourses.com/ACCT%20553/acct-553-week-6-assignment-you-decide Product Description Penelope, Mark, and John Entity Selection After 20+ years of working for other firms, Penelope (Enrolled Agent, age 41), Mark (CPA, age 43) and John (CVA, age 65) want to leave the firms they are currently employed by and become their own bosses. Penelope specializes in Taxes, Mark is the Auditor and John is a Business Valuation expert. There are so many options available to how they can structure the new business(s). The appropriate business entity for any individual(s) will depend on their particular facts and circumstances. You are a valued colleague and friend of this three-some and they have come to you seeking advice as to how to structure their new business. They have the knowledge to figure it out themselves, but are looking for the advice of an unbiased 3rd party. Please consider the following tax and non-tax considerations as you recommend an entity choice to Penelope, Mark and John. Tax Memo #2-Executive Compensation Issue One and Applicable Case Law, Code & Regulations Issue Two and Applicable Case Law, Code & Regulations Issue Three and Applicable Case Law, Code & Regulations ACCT 553 Week 6 Assignment: You Decide Purchase here http://chosecourses.com/ACCT%20553/acct-553-week-6-assignment-you-decide Product Description Penelope, Mark, and John Entity Selection After 20+ years......

Words: 832 - Pages: 4

Acct 553 Week 6 Assignment You Decide

...ACCT 553 WEEK 6 ASSIGNMENT YOU DECIDE To purchase this visit following link: http://www.activitymode.com/product/acct-553-week-6-assignment-you-decide/ Contact us at: SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM ACCT 553 WEEK 6 ASSIGNMENT YOU DECIDE ACCT 553 Week 6 Assignment You Decide Penelope, Mark, and John Entity Selection After 20+ years of working for other firms, Penelope (Enrolled Agent, age 41), Mark (CPA, age 43) and John (CVA, age 65) want to leave the firms they are currently employed by and become their own bosses. Penelope specializes in Taxes, Mark is the Auditor and John is a Business Valuation expert. There are so many options available to how they can structure the new business(s). The appropriate business entity for any individual(s) will depend on their particular facts and circumstances. You are a valued colleague and friend of this three-some and they have come to you seeking advice as to how to structure their new business. They have the knowledge to figure it out themselves, but are looking for the advice of an unbiased 3rd party. Please consider the following tax and non-tax considerations as you recommend an entity choice to Penelope, Mark and John. Tax Memo #2-Executive Compensation Issue One and Applicable Case Law, Code & Regulations Issue Two and Applicable Case Law, Code & Regulations Issue Three and Applicable Case Law, Code & Regulations Activity mode aims to provide quality study notes and tutorials to the students of ACCT 553 Week 6......

Words: 1286 - Pages: 6

Ac 553 - Week 4

...Week 4: Homework Problems Questions: 14-4 The purpose of the nonrecognition of gains/losses upon transfers of property is to encourage corporate formation. Gains and losses are not recognized upon transfer of property to corporations because essentially the transferee has retained their investment in the property through a different form - stock. When the property is transferred for the stock, the transferee does not recognize a gain or loss and therefore there is no tax burden on the transfer. 14-20 Corporations have the flexibility of choosing their tax year. They can choose to run on the calendar year or a different fiscal year. In addition, their fiscal year does not have to match up to the same accounting periods as the owners of the corporation. In the beginning of a corporation’s life, there is usually a net loss and having a different accounting tax year than that of the owners can lead for a tax benefit for the owners when applying this net loss. In a proprietorship and partnerships generally have to use the same tax year as the owners and S-corporations are generally required to use the calendar year as their tax year. Corporations definitely have the advantage here. 14-22 Corporate capital gains and losses computation is very similar to capital gain/loss for individuals. Capital gains and losses can be short-term and long-term, just like individuals’ capital gains and losses. When a capital gain occurs for corporations, they are required to be included in......

Words: 689 - Pages: 3

Week 4 You Decide Project

...Taxes and Estate Planning John Smith Tax Issues 1. (a) Amount of $300,000 will be treated as self-employment ordinary income. Self-employment tax is a tax consisting of Social Security and Medicare taxes primarily for individuals who work for themselves. It is similar to the Social Security and Medicare taxes withheld from the pay of most wage earners. If you use a tax year other than the calendar year, you must use the tax rate and maximum earnings limit in effect at the beginning of your tax year. Even if the tax rate or maximum earnings limit changes during your tax year, continue to use the same rate and limit throughout your tax year. http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=98846,00.html 1. (b) Amount of $25,000 was paid to your office as recovery of expenses. If that was previously expensed, it will be considered an income to and will affect your tax rate. If the amount was held in escrow and was not expensed, you may deduct against expenses incurred during the case as business expense. To give an understanding about “deferred expenses” we will define it as assets used to enable cash paid out to counterpart of goods or services to be received in a latter accounting period when fulfilling the promise to pay is acknowledged. Even if a location tax incentive were treated as an amount paid to the taxpayer, it is generally not conditioned on the taxpayer’s actual use of the amount to acquire capital assets, and thus does not become a......

Words: 1188 - Pages: 5

You Decide Week 4

...Memo To: John & Jane Smith From: LaToya Stephenson Date: March 25, 2012 Re: Memo summarizing various tax issues 1. John Smith's tax issues: Issue a) How is the $300,000 treated for purposes of federal tax income? Applicable Law & Analysis: Code Sec 61(a) states that gross income includes “all income from whatever source derived” unless specifically exempted by law. In the case of Eisner v. Macomber, 1 UTSC ¶32, 252 U.S. 189, 50 S Ct. 189 (1920), the Supreme Court dealt great length with the problem of defining income. The court stated: “Income may be defined as the gain derived from capital, from labor, or both combined” provided it be understood to include profit gained through sale or conversion of capital assets. Conclusion: John would have to include the $300,000 in his income tax as gross income. He will have to claim it on his personal income tax 1040 and attach the schedule C, sole proprietorship profit or loss form. Issue b) How is the $25,000 treated for purposes of federal tax income? Applicable Law & Analysis: IRC Sec. 111 states “Gross income does not include income attributable to the recovery during the taxable year of any amount deducted in any prior taxable year to the extent such amount did not reduce the amount of tax imposed by this chapter”. Conclusion: John will able to use the $25,000 to offset the deferred......

Words: 1226 - Pages: 5

You Decide John and Jane Case

...with John, then it will be treated as a self-employment income that will be taxed after deducting any business expenses. “Self-employed individuals generally must pay self-employment tax (SE tax) as well as income tax. SE tax is a Social Security and Medicare tax primarily for individuals who work for themselves. It is similar to the Social Security and Medicare taxes withheld from the pay of most wage earners. In general, anytime the wording "self-employment tax" is used, it only refers to Social Security and Medicare taxes and not any other tax” http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/selfemployed/index.html B. How is the $25,000 treated for purposes of federal tax income? The 25,000 is treated as an income and at the same time as a business expense. The $25,000 should be included in John’s income since he received it, while he still can claim this amount as a business expense, so he will be taxed on this amount. C. What is your determination regarding reducing the taxable amount of income for both (a) and (b) above? The $25,000 has been used already as business expenses, so it is not taxable income. The $300,000 is considered a lump sum payment for two years of work on this case; therefore John needs to see what his best option to report this income is. If John reports his income in one year, that will put him in a higher tax bracket. The more income you make, the higher taxes you pay, so the better option is to review last year’s tax return and compare the tax rate...

Words: 1421 - Pages: 6

Ac553 Week 4-You Decide

...You Decide-Week 4 ACCT553 John Smith tax issues: a. How is the $300,000 treated for purposes of federal tax income? Mr. Smith, in regards to your $300,000 earnings for the successful litigation of your clients case, this will be treated as current year earnings. The payment fits all three doctrines of income starting with the economic doctrine which states “all income from whatever source derived” IRC Code Sec. 61 (a). The constructive receipt doctrine, outlining constructive receipt of payments, allows us to treat the payment for this current year only even though it was income from a case that lasted two years. “Income is not constructively received if the taxpayer’s control of its receipt is subject to substantial limitations or restrictions.” Reg. §1.451-2. Since these earnings were under the restriction of a successful verdict for your client, the payment could not be considered as earned any sooner than now. Since you operate your legal practice through an LLC, the assignment of income falls to the Limited Liability Corporation of which you are the primary member. Although the income is assigned to the LLC, there is only one layer of income tax, yours, since the LLC is treated as a conduit entity. All income will pass through to you as ordinary income, after business exclusions and deductions of course. The LLC is a disregarded entity and for federal tax purposes the activities of the business will be treated as if you were a sole proprietor (IRC Code......

Words: 1623 - Pages: 7

You Decide Week 4

...John Smith Tax issue 1(a) Issue: The issue is the $300,000 in income for John’s fees. How to treat this in Income Tax? Rule of Law: Section 61(a) of the Code the concept of income is broad and general. Gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items: (1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items; (2) Gross income derived from business; (3) Gains derived from dealings in property; (4) Interest; (5) Rents; (6) Royalties; (7) Dividends; (8) Alimony and separate maintenance payments; (9) Annuities; (10) Income from life insurance and endowment contracts; (11) Pensions; (12) Income from discharge of indebtedness; (13) Distributive share of partnership gross income; (14) Income in respect of a decedent; and (15) Income from an interest in an estate or trust. I.R.C § 61 Analysis: Section 61(a) it basically says that the gross income is not limited to these items, but that these are just the most typical sources of income. It is irrelevant whether or not the above items are received in money, goods, or services. Conclusion: The $300,000 that John received for services rendered from the court case is considered earned income for the year. The $300,000 is earned income for John Smith and will be reported as gross income either on Schedule C of the individual return or as gross income on the LLC return. ...

Words: 4337 - Pages: 18